Skip to main content
Log in

A Bioeconomic Analysis of a Shellfishery: The Effects of Recruitment and Habitat in a Metapopulation Model

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a bioeconomic model wherefishing effort exerted has multiple impacts onthe recruitment process of a sedentaryshellfish population. Recognizing thatsedentary populations generally possessmetapopulation characteristics at therecruitment stage, we show that fishing effortexerted not only influences the recruitmentprocess indirectly by limiting the number ofadults that spawn, but also directly byaffecting the habitat in which shellfish larvaerecruit. Depending on the recruitmentcharacteristics, fishing can have negative andpositive direct and indirect effects on therecruitment process. Next, a positive directeffect that fishing can have on the growth rateof the shellfish population if space to recruitto is limited is studied. Generalcharacteristics of sustainable fishing areanalyzed for the case that recruitment occursimmediately once spawning has occurred as wellas for the case that recruitment takes placeover a longer period of time. Conditions areidentified under which shellfishing should beencouraged in order to facilitate therecruitment process of juveniles. The paperends by analyzing how fishing alters theoptimal sustainable solution when itcontributes to habitat destruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, S.E. and J. Roughgarden (1996), ‘Larval Transport and Population Dynamics of Intertidal Barnacles: A Coupled Benthic/Oceanic Model’, Ecological Monographs 66, 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. and J. Roughgarden (1997), ‘A Metapopulation Model with Private Property and a Common Pool’, Ecological Economics 22, 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulte, E.H. and G.C. van Kooten (1999), ‘Metapopulation Dynamics and Stochastic Bioeconomic modeling’, Ecological Economics 30, 293–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C.W. (1990), Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources, 2nd edition. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, J.M. and C.W. Clark (1987), Natural Resource Economics: Notes and Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolmer, P., P. Sand Kristensen and E. Hoffman (1999), ‘Dredging of Blue Mussels in a Danish Sound: Stock Sizes and Fishery-effects on Mussel Population Dynamic’, Fisheries Research 40, 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, H. (1998), ‘Bioeconomic Analysis and Management: The Case of Fisheries’, Environmental and Resource Economics 11, 399–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulland, J.A. (1983), Fish Stock Assessment: A Manual of Basic Methods, FAO-Wiley Series on Food and Agriculture, Vol. I. Chicester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honkoop, P.J.C. and J. van der Meer (1998), ‘Experimentally Induced Effects of Water Temperature and Immersion Time on Reproductive Output of Bivalves in the Wadden Sea’, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 220, 227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Man, A., R. Law and N. Polunin (1995), ‘Role of Marine Reserves in Recruitment to Reef Fisheries: a Metapopulation Model’, Biological Conservation 71, 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neher, P.A. (1990), Natural Resource Economics: Conservation and Exploitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petraitis, P.S. (1995), ‘The Role of Growth in Maintaining Spatial Dominance by Mussels (Mytilus Edulis)’, Ecology 76, 1337–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzey, C.V., C.M. Roberts and B.T. Urdal (2000), ‘A Simple Bioeconomic Model of a Marine Reserve’, Ecological Economics 33, 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piersma, T., A. Koolhaas, A. Dekinga, J.J. Beukema, R. Dekker and K. Essink (2001), ‘Long-term Indirect Effects of Mechanical Cockle-dredging on Intertidal Bivalve stocks in the Wadden Sea’, Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 976–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Possingham, H.P. and J. Roughgarden (1990), ‘Spatial Population Dynamics of a Marine Organism with a Complex Life Cycle’, Ecology 71, 973–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricker, W.E. (1954), ‘Stock and Recruitment’, Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada 11, 559–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchirico, J.N. and J.E. Wilen (1999), ‘Bioeconomics of Spatial Exploitation in a Patchy Environment’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37, 129–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. and D. Starrett (1975), ‘Most Rapid Approach Paths in Accumulation Problems’, International Economic Review 16, 388–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprung, M. (1983), ‘Reproduction and Fecundity of the Mussel Mytilus Edulis at Helgoland’, Helgolander. Wiss. Meeresunters 36, 243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vooys, C.G.N. (1999), ‘Numbers of Larvae and Primary Plantigrades of the MusselMytilus Edulis in the Western Dutch Wadden Sea’, Journal of Sea Research 41, 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Imeson, R., van den Bergh, J. A Bioeconomic Analysis of a Shellfishery: The Effects of Recruitment and Habitat in a Metapopulation Model. Environmental and Resource Economics 27, 65–86 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000016797.30911.3f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000016797.30911.3f

Navigation