Skip to main content
Log in

Images from a Neoliberal City: The State, Surveillance and Social Control

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Smith (1996: 230–232) characterized the latetwentieth century crusade for a ‘‘new urbanfrontier’’ as akin to the Wild West ofnineteenth century America. In the last tenyears, not only in the North American contextbut in Europe too, extending the boundaries ofthe urban frontier – economically,politically, and culturally – has galvanizedpowerful urban coalitions in the task ofre-taking – both ideologically and materially– city spaces from the visible and symbolicelements of urban degeneration. The project ofurban reclamation has not been neutral but hasbeen formulated within a post welfare,neoliberal politics that has promoted aideology of self responsibilisation within aclimate of moral indifference to increasinglyvisible inequality. These ideological shiftshave been fuelled by, and consolidated in, anevolving form of state ensemble that, as arapidly moving target (Hay 1996: 3), has beenlargely neglected in criminological analysis.It is the contention of this paper that theagents and agencies of the neoliberal state areconstructing the boundaries and possibilitiesof the new urban frontier while simultaneouslyengaging in a project of social control thatwill have far-reaching consequences for how weunderstand the meanings of public space, socialjustice and the parameters of state power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barry, A., Osbourne, T. and Rose, N. (eds.) (1996). Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogden, M. (1982). The Police: Autonomy and Consent. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1979). “The punitive city”: Notes on the dispersal of social control. Contemporary Crisis 3(4), 339–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R. (2003). Surveillance, Power and Social Order: A Case Study of CCTV in Liverpool. Doctorate (PhD) submitted to Liverpool John Moores University, The British Library, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R. and Sim, J. (1998). From the dockyards to the Disney store: Risk, surveillance and security in Liverpool City Centre. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology 12(1) (March), 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R. and Sim, J. (2000). “You’ll never walk alone”: CCTV surveillance, order and neo-liberal rule in Liverpool city centre. British Journal of Sociology 51(4), 623–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R., Sim, J. and Whyte, D. (2002). Power, politics and partnerships: The state of crime prevention on Merseyside. In G. Hughes and A. Edwards (eds.), Crime Control and Community: The New Politics of Public Safety. Willan Publishing, pp. 86–108.

  • Currie, E. (1997). The scalpel, not the chainsaw. City, No. 8 (December), 132-137.

  • Daily Post (2000). 1.5 m safety zone for city, 22 August.

  • Daily Post (2001). North West the most polluted area in the UK, 17 April.

  • Daily Post (2002a). Liverpool is behind in wealth “league”, 11 May.

  • Daily Post (2002b). Bid to ban penny for the guy “begging”, 6 November.

  • Daily Post (2003). Crackdown on street beggars, 13 March.

  • Davies, S. (1996). The case against: CCTV should not be introduced. International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention 4(1), 315–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1990). City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, L. (1996). Labour’s mean streets. The Guardian, 4 June.

  • Fairclough, N. (2000). New Labour, New Language? London: Karia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M. and Simon, J. (1994). Actuarial Justice: The emerging criminal law. In D. Nelken (ed.), The Futures of Criminology. London: Sage, pp. 173–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A. (1988). The Free Economy and the Strong State. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss, J. (1993). The “magic of the mall”: An analysis of form, function, and meaning in the contemporary retail built environment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 83(1), 18–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss, J. (1996). Disquiet on the waterfront: Reflections on nostalgia and utopia in the urban archetypes of festival market places. Urban Geography 17(3), 221–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (2000). The fifth utility. Index on Censorship, No. 2.

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian (1995). Straw defiant on begging, 9 September.

  • Hall, T. and Hubbard, P. (1996). The entrepreneurial city: New urban politics, new urban geographies. Progress in Human Geography 20(2), 153–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansard (1999). Written answers for 2 November 1999. House of Commons: 10.

  • Harvey, D. (1985). The Urbanisation of Capital. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Inquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C (1996). Re-stating Social and Political Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1994). CCTV: Looking Out For You. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Independent (2003d). Police ban hooded tops from high street, 23 May.

  • The Independent on Sunday (2002). Robot cameras “will predict crime before they happen”, 21 April.

  • Jessop, B. (1990). State Theory. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskela, H. (2002). Video surveillance, gender and the safety of public urban space: “Peeping Tom” goes hi-tech’? Urban Geography 23(3), 257–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liverpool Echo (1999a). Mersey force faces CS spray row, 5 March.

  • Liverpool Echo (1999b). We’re still the poor relations, 25 October.

  • Liverpool Echo (2000). Shock findings in truancy blitz, 19 June.

  • Liverpool Echo (2001a). Cameras set to cut crime, 13 March.

  • Liverpool Echo (2001b). Is Liverpool a racist city? 3 July.

  • Liverpool Echo (2001c). Pollution hits regions poor, 17 April.

  • Liverpool Echo (2002). Skateboard ban in City, 24 July.

  • Liverpool Echo (2003a). Reclaim our streets, 21 January.

  • Liverpool Echo (2003b). Boom town, 6 June.

  • Liverpool Echo (2003c). Wardens to fight crime, 6 June.

  • Logan, J.R. and Molotch, H.L. (1987). Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2001). Postmodern geographical praxis? Postmodern impulse and the war against homeless people in the “postjustice” city. In C. Minca (ed.), Postmodern Geography: Theory and Praxis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 57–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • NACRO (2002). To CCTV or Not to CCTV? A Review of Current Research into CCTV Systems in Reducing Crime. Nacro Community Safety Practice Briefing.

  • Pacione, M. (1997). Urban restructuring and the reproduction of inequality in Britain’s cities: An overview. In M. Pacione (ed.), Britain’s Cities: Geographies of Division in Urban Britain. London: Routledge, pp. 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parenti, C. (1999). Lockdown America: Police and Prisons in the Age of Crisis. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. and Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 34(3) (June), 380–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage,M., Ward, A. and Warde, K. (2003). Urban Sociology, Capitalism and Modernity, 2nd Edition. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearing, C.D. (2001). Punishment and the changing face of governance. Punishment and Society 3(2), 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearing, C.D. and Stenning, P.C. (1985>1996). From the panopticon to Disney World: The development of discipline. In J. Muncie, E. McLaughlin and M. Langan (eds.), Criminological Perspectives: A Reader. Milton Keynes: Open University, pp. 413–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1996). The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorkin, M. (1992). Introduction: Variations on a Theme Park. In M. Sorkin (ed.), Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City. New York: Hill Wang, pp. xi–xv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1996). Reconstructing citizenship, the re-scaling of the state and the new authoritarianism: Closing the Belgian mines. Urban Studies 33(8), 1499–1521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (1997). Crime, anxiety and locality: Responding to the “condition of England” at the end of the century. Theoretical Criminology 1(1), 58–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (1999). Crime in Context: A critical Criminology of Market Societies. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, N. (1998). Evaluating the effectiveness of CCTV schemes, In C. Norris, J. Moran and G. Armstrong (eds.), Surveillance, Closed Circuit Television and Social Control. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, S. and Whyte, D. (2003), Introduction: Corporations beyond the law? Regulation, risk and corporate crime in a globalized era. Risk Management: An International Journal 5(2), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Swaaningen, R. (1997). Critical Criminology: Visions from Europe. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. (1997). Globalisation and the myth of the powerless state. In New left Review, No. 225 (September/October), 3-27.

  • Welsh, B.C. and Farrington, D.P. (2002). Crime Prevention Effects of CCTV: A Systematic Evaluation. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • www.environment-agency.gov.uk.

  • www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/areas/subject/env_nat_res2.htm.

  • Zukin, S. (1996). Cultural strategies of economic development and the hegemony of vision. In A. Merryfield and E. Swyngedouw (eds.), The Urbanisation of Injustice. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 223–243.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coleman, R. Images from a Neoliberal City: The State, Surveillance and Social Control. Crit Crim 12, 21–42 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIT.0000024443.08828.d8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIT.0000024443.08828.d8

Keywords

Navigation