Skip to main content

The City and the Abandonment of Public Space. Between Neoliberal and Citizen Urbanism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urbicide

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

  • 437 Accesses

Abstract

This text reflects on the city and the influence of urban neoliberalism in the destruction of historical and cultural elements causing social damage. The focus is related to public space because it is the active scene of citizen expression, where the social-cultural, environmental and political effects of this model of development converge. In this context, the crisis of the city imagined as a social and symbolic space where links can be created between different people, forms of urban articulation and creative solutions to conflicts over citizen rights, is emphasized. In the debate on this crisis, which is visible in public space, the concept of “urbicide” is useful, because  alludes to the deprivation, ruin, or abandonment of ideas and of social and spatial foundations that make the city a reference for urban identity and cultural heritage accessible to the different social groups that they use and live. It is interesting to reflect:  in what sense do we speak of urbicide? How do we understand and distinguish that condition? In an actual city, what is left of what is common for the reconstruction of the public?

…a basic distinction: one thing is the built environment and another is how people live in it.

the way people want to live should be expressed in the way cities are built...

Sennett, R. (2019)

Study carried out within the framework of the research project “From domestic space to public space in times of pandemic. Social inequalities, urban violence and conflicts over rights centralities, peripheries and local and global borders (2022–2024)” under my coordination, PAPIIT IN306822-DGAPA-UNAM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ornelas (2000).

  2. 2.

    Rodríguez and Rodríguez (2009: 7).

  3. 3.

    Along the lines of Brenner and Theodore (2002).

  4. 4.

    Ramírez (2021).

  5. 5.

    See the website for the reconstruction of the Commission for the Reconstruction of the Government of Mexico City.

  6. 6.

    See Pradilla (2018) and Carlos De Mattos (2007).

  7. 7.

    The towns surrounding the corporate complex are San Mateo Tlaltenango, San Bartolo Ameyalco and Santa Fe de los Altos.

  8. 8.

    Through Av. Reform-Lomas, Constituyentes and the Mexico-Toluca highway.

  9. 9.

    This complex, which includes a restaurant, a shopping center and entertainment areas, was managed by the construction company of the Capital Vertical Grupo Inmobiliario building, while “LBR y Arquitectos” was responsible for the planning. In 2018, it was chosen as the best skyscraper in the world by the International Highrise Award. It was included in the list of the “50 most influential skyscrapers in the world in the last 50 years” by the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat. See Infobae (2022) which are the three tallest buildings in Mexico City.

  10. 10.

    These works amount to an investment of 10 billion pesos and are being built on the stretch from Hidalgo Avenue to the Fuente de Petróleos, and their construction will result in an investment of 600 million pesos as a result of mitigation measures, which will be provided to a private trust whose main destination will be mobility projects and improvement of public space in Reforma and surrounding areas. See Zamarrón (2022). The new real estate boom in Reforma will provide 600 million pesos to Mexico City. Forbes Mexico.

  11. 11.

    Located in the Benito Juárez area on the border with the Coyoacán area. The authorization included the construction of 1 million 28 thousand 71.96 m2; however, the volume almost doubled, despite insisting complaints from affected neighbors (Proceso Magazine: 2019).

  12. 12.

    Listed as a historic monument by the National Institute of Anthropology and History.

  13. 13.

    There are 14 types of apartments with dimensions ranging from 68 to 314 m2, with an approximate price of 70,000 pesos per m2, meaning that the smallest apartment is worth approximately 4.7 million pesos, while the largest one costs between 22 and 28 million pesos. In addition, it has a profitable office area of 64 thousand 649 m2, distributed in 25 commercial spaces; its main tenants are: Loreal, Sanofi, WeWork and Total Play. Within the complex, there are different amenities such as cinema, swimming pool, toy library, children’s games, event room and guest rooms, games room, sauna, spa, steam room and a gym.

  14. 14.

    ¿Quién es dueño de Mitikah?, la polémica obra de la CDMX. La Silla Rota, 24/09/2022.

  15. 15.

    Mitikah, El cartel inmobiliario y los sismos, Alejandro de la Garza, Sin Embargo, 24 de septiembre, 2022.

  16. 16.

    The company Fibra Uno bought the construction from Ideurban and Prudential in 2015 for 185 million dollars. See Emilio Gómez, Mitikah: Neoliberal Emblem, The Mayan Day, opinion, September 24, 2022.

  17. 17.

    The developer of the FIBRA UNO project is analyzing the second phase of construction of the project, so far they have land use authorization for the entire comprehensive project, but private licenses for this stage have not yet been granted. See Noguez (2022). After 14 years of construction, Mitikah Shopping Center will open at the end of the year. Forbes Mexico.

  18. 18.

    A fine of 40 million pesos was imposed, but the lack of clarity in payment persists until the time of writing this article. Residents fear that an attempt will be made to continue with the work of the overpass that would privatize the street and the fine could be resolved by creating mitigation works in the area.

  19. 19.

    The real estate boom in the period 2013–2018 is expressed in the support and authorization of 292 real estate projects, most of which are considered to have high impact, which represent housing developments, offices, centers and shopping malls, to a lesser extent hotels and hospitals (Cruz 2018). Most of it is concentrated in the municipalities of Álvaro Obregón, Miguel Hidalgo, Benito Juárez, Cuauhtémoc and Cuajimalpa.

  20. 20.

    See Expansion (2022) “The Naked 500”.

  21. 21.

    Panreiter (2011), cites the existence of 329 companies in 2006.

  22. 22.

    The highest proportion of violations of the law occurred in two central municipalities in the capital: Benito Juárez and Cuauhtémoc (PAOT 2017–2018).

  23. 23.

    Di Masso et al. (2017).

References

  • Berman M (1987) Among the ruins. New internationalist. Recuperado de: https://newint.org/features/1987/12/05/among

  • Bourdieu P (1999) “Los efectos del lugar”, en P. Bourdieu (Dir.), La miseria del mundo, Buenos Aires, Fondo de Cultura Económica [1a. ed. en francés, París, Éditions du Seuil, 1993]

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira T (2007) Ciudad de muros. Gedisa, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrión F (2014) Urbicidio o la producción del olvido. En Habitar el Patrimonio, nuevos aportes al debate desde América Latina, editado por Lucía Durán, Eduardo Kingman y Mónica Lacarrieu. Instituto Metropolitano de Patrimonio/Flacso/Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ecuador, pp 116–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Masso A, Berroeta H, Vidal T (2017) El espacio público en conflicto: Coordenadas conceptuales y tensiones ideológicas. Revista de Pensamiento e Investigación Social, Athenea Digital, vol 17, no 3, pp 53–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalante F (2015) Historia mínima el Neoliberalismo. El Colegio de México, Ciudad de México

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2007) Breve historia del neoliberalismo. Akal, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2015) Breve historia del neoliberalismo. Ediciones Akal, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo R, Janoschka M (2014) La ciudad neoliberal. Gentrificación y exclusión en Santiago de Chile, Buenos Aires, Ciudad de México y Madrid, Santiago de Chile, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (Serie Geolibros, núm. 19)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno M (2011) “Terciarización económica y la creación de clusters: el megaproyecto de Santa Fe en la Ciudad de México”, en Alejandro Mercado y María Moreno (coords.), La Ciudad de México y sus clusters, México, Juan Pablos/UAM Cuajimalpa, pp 143–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnreiter C (2011) Formación de la ciudad global, economía inmobiliaria y transnacionalización de espacios urbanos: El caso de Ciudad de México. EURE (santiago) 37(111):5–24. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612011000200001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Negrete M (2017) “Los megaproyectos en la Ciudad de México”, en Ana María Portal, Ciudad global, procesos locales: conflictos urbanos y estrategias socioculturales en la construcción del sentido de pertenencia y del territorio en la Ciudad de México, Ciudad de México, UAM-Iztapalapa/Juan Pablos

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez P (2021) La ciudad neoliberal en Santa Fe. El sentido privado del espacio público, en Espacios públicos y ciudadanías en conflicto en la Ciudad de México, coordinado por Patricia Ramírez. Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales UNAM/Juan Pablos, México, pp 391–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen S (2001) The global city: New York. London. Tokio. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen S (2015) Expulsiones. Brutalidad y complejidad en la economía global, Buenos Aires, Katz

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett R (2019) Construir y habitar. Ética para la ciudad. Ed. Anagrama, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Subirats J, Martí-Costa M (2014) Ciudades, vulnerabilidades y crisis en España. Sevilla, Fundación Centro Estudios Andaluces

    Google Scholar 

Hemerographic Sources

Documents

  • Brenner N, Theodore N (2002) Cities and the Geographies of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism”. Antipode 34(3):349–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00246

  • Cobos EP (2018) Cambios neoliberales contradicciones y futuro incierto de las metrópolis latinoamericanas. Cadernos Metrópole 20(43):649–672. https://10.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2018-4302

  • Cruz Flores A (2018) Invadieron la ciudad 19.4 millones de m2 de concreto y acero en esta administración, La Jornada, 3 de diciembre: https://www.jornada.com.mx/2018/12/03/capital/026n1cap

  • De Mattos CA (2007) Globalización, negocios inmobiliarios y transformación urbana. Nueva sociedad, 212:82

    Google Scholar 

  • EVALÚA (2021) Resultados de la medición de la pobreza 2016–2020. México: Consejo de Evaluación del Desarrollo Social de la Ciudad de México (Evalúa). Disponible en: https://www.evalua.cdmx.gob.mx/principales-atribuciones/medicion-de-la-pobreza-y-desigualdad

  • LaSalle JL (2022) Panorama de Mercado de oficinas clase A. Ciudad de México 2Q 2022. JLL online

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorcock M (1963) “Dead God's Homecoming”, in Science Fantasy #59, Nova Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornelas J (2000) La ciudad bajo el neoliberalismo. Papeles de población 6(23):45–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradilla E (2018) Cambios neoliberales, contradicciones y futuro incierto de las metrópolis latinoamericanas. Cadernos Metrópole 20:649–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez A, Rodríguez P (2009) Santiago, una ciudad neoliberal. Quito: Organización latinoamericana y del caribe de centros históricos (OLACCHI), pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Ramírez Kuri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ramírez Kuri, P. (2023). The City and the Abandonment of Public Space. Between Neoliberal and Citizen Urbanism. In: Carrión Mena, F., Cepeda Pico, P. (eds) Urbicide. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25304-1_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics