Skip to main content
Log in

Biphasic Versus Monophasic Shock Waveform for Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation

  • Published:
Cardiac Electrophysiology Review

Abstract

Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) using traditional monophasic shock waveform is unsuccessful in up to 20% of cases, and often requires several shocks of up to 360 J. Based on the success with biphasic shock waveform in converting ventricular fibrillation, it was postulated that biphasic shocks would allow cardioversion with lower energy. In a international multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial of 203 patients, damped sine wave monophasic shocks were compared with impedance-compensated truncated exponential biphasic waveform shocks. Patients received up to five shocks: 100 J, 150 J, 200 J, a fourth shock at maximum output for the initial waveform (200 J biphasic, 360 J monophasic) and a final cross-over shock at maximum output of the alternate waveform. For each energy level, the biphasic waveform compared favorably to the monophasic waveform in successful cardioversion (100 J: 60% versus 22%, P < 0.0001; 150 J: 77% versus 44%, p < 0.0001; 200 J: 90% versus 53%, p < 0.0001). Success with 200 J biphasic was equivalent to 360 J monophasic shock (91% versus 85%, p = 0.29). Patients randomized to biphasic waveform required fewer shocks and lower total energy delivered; in addition, this waveform was associated with less dermal injury and no blistering. Biphasic shocks converted AF present for less than 48 hours with 80% efficacy, but conversion of AF present for more than 48 hours and more than 1 year the success rate was only 63 and 20%, respectively. The results of this study is similar to other investigations comparing biphasic and monophasic shock waveforms for conversion of atrial fibrillation. We recommend starting with biphasic energy of 100 J for atrial fibrillation of less than 48 hours duration, but using higher energies (150 J, 200 J or greater) when AF has been present for longer periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Joglar JA, Hamdan MH, Ramaswamy K, Zagrodzky JD, Sheehan CJ, Nelson LL, Andrews TC, Page RL. Initial energy for elective external cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:348-350.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oral H, Souza JJ, Michaud GF, Knight BP, Goyal R, Strickberger SA, Morady F. Facilitating transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with ibutilide pretreatment. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1849-1854.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bardy GH, Ivey TD, Allen MD, Johnson G, Mehra R, Greene HL. A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humans. J AmColl Cardiol 1989;14(3):728-733.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dalzell, GW, Anderson J, Adgey AA. Factors determining success and energy requirements for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Q J Med 1990;76:903-913.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Levy S, Lauribe P, Dolla E, Kou W, Kadish A, Calkins H, Pagannelli F, Moyal C, Bremondy M, Schork A. A randomized comparison of external and internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1992;86:1415-1420.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Page RL, Kerber RE Russell JK, Trouton T, Waktare J, Gallik D, Olgin JE, Ricard P, Dalzell GW, Reddy R, Lazzara R, Lee K, Carlson M, Halperin B, Bardy GH, for the BiCard Investigators. Biphasic Versus Monophasic Shock Waveform for Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation: The results of an international randomized, double-blind multicenter trial. J AmColl Cardiol 2002;39:1956-1963.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ricard P, Levy S, Boccara G, Lakhal E, Bardy G. External Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of Biphasic vs. Monophasic Waveform Shocks. Europace 2001;3:96-99.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mittal S, Ayati S, Stein KM, Schwartzman D, Cavlovich D, Tchou PJ, Markowitz SM, Slotwiner DJ, Scheiner MA, Lerman BB. Transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: Comparison of rectilinear biphasic versus damped sine wave monophasic shocks. Circulation 2000;101:1282-1287.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rho, R.W., Page, R.L. Biphasic Versus Monophasic Shock Waveform for Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation. Card Electrophysiol Rev 7, 290–291 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CEPR.0000012398.01150.eb

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CEPR.0000012398.01150.eb

Navigation