Skip to main content
Log in

The Power of Supervision in Child Welfare Services

  • Published:
Child and Youth Care Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines factors influencing the empowerment of child welfare workers. It correlates relationships among workers' perceptions of supervisors' help-giving behaviors, perceptions of agency support, and their perceived empowerment. The research investigated the associations between length of employment and type of educational degree and worker empowerment. The cross-sectional survey design used a sample of 85 child welfare workers. Multiple regression examined the combined influence of the predictor variables on worker empowerment as well as the degree of influence each predictor variable individually had upon the criterion variable, while others were controlled for. Results, confirmed by path analysis and underscored by qualitative responses, indicated that workers perceived their supervisors' helpgiving behaviors as the only factor that influenced their perceived empowerment. The author discusses implications for practice in human services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980, (P. L. 96272), H. R. 3439, 94 STAT, 500 (June 17, 1980).

  • Bandura, A. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33, 344–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognition theory. {tiAmerican Psychologist}, 44, 1175–1185.

  • Blau, P. M. (1960). Orientation toward clients in a public welfare agency. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5, 341–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. J., & Austin, M. J. (1994). Organizational learning and change in a public welfare agency. Administration in Social Work, 18, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunst, C. J. (1995). {tiHelpgiving practices of early intervention professionals: Are we doing what we think we are doing?} Paper presented at the Annual Victoria Australian Early Intervention Association Conference, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Deal, A. G. (1988). Enabling and empowering families. In C.J. Dunst, C. M.Trivette, & A. G. Deal (Eds.), Strengthening andsupporting families: Methods, strategies, and practices, Vol. 1 (pp. 2–11). Cambridge: Brookline Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Hamby, D. W. (1996). Measuring the helpgiving practices of human services program practitioners. {tiHuman Relations}, 49, 815–835.

  • Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & DavisLaMastro. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellett, C. D., Ellett, A. J., Kelley, B. L., & Noble, D. N. (1996). {tiA statewide study of child welfare personnel needs: Who stays? Who leaves? Who cares?} Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Washington, D. C.

  • Fox, R. (1989). Relationship: The cornerstone of clinical supervision. Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 70, 146–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frans, D. (1993). A scale for measuring social worker empowerment. Research on Social Work Practice, 3, 312–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galant, K. R., Trivette, C. M., & Dunst, D. J. (1999). The meaning and implications of empowerment. In G. G. Bear, K. M. Minke, & A. Thomas (Eds.), Children's needs II:Development, problems, and alternatives, (pp. 681–688). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child & Youth Care Forum 326. Glisson, C. & Durick, M. (1988). Predictors of job satisfaction and organization commitment in human service organizations. Administrative Quarterly, 33, 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, E. F. & Orten, J. F.(1973). Student attitudes toward the poor. Social Work, 18 (1), 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, L. M. (1994). Beyond coping: An empowerment perspective on stressful life events. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 21, 201–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings(4th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: PrenticeHall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, D., & Poertner, J. (1989). Research and social work supervision: A conceptual review. Social Work, 34, 115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, D., & Hensley, H. (1991). Changing the focus of social work supervision: Effects on client satisfaction and generalized contentment. Social Work, 36, 506–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegar, R. L., & Hunzeker, J. M. (1988). Moving toward empowermentbased practice in public child welfare. Social Work, 35, 499–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, D. M. (1999). Empowerment in Supervision. Feminism & Psychology, 9 (4), 406–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, A. (1974). Supervisorsupervisee: A survey. Social Work, 19, 228–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, A. (1976). Supervision in social work. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, A. (1985). Supervision in social work.(2nd Ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, D. R., Holzhalb, C. M., & Holland, T. P. (1998). Measuring staff empowerment: Development of a worker empowerment scale. Research on Social Work Practice, 8, 212–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, M., & Skaw, K. G. (1995). Trust, empowerment, and reflection: Essentials of supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 10, 262–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 121–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A. & Babbie, E. (1997). Research methods for social work. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1993). Interactional supervision. Washington: NASW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1996). Supervision and consultation. In Encyclopedia of Social Work (Vol. 3, pp. 2373–2379). Washington, DC: NASW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, B., (1976). Black empowerment: Social work in oppressed communities. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics(3rd Ed.). Northridge, CA: Harper Collins College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. B. (1997). On parallel process in social work supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal, 25, 425–435.Cearley 327

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cearley, S. The Power of Supervision in Child Welfare Services. Child & Youth Care Forum 33, 313–327 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CCAR.0000043038.97882.2f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CCAR.0000043038.97882.2f

Navigation