Skip to main content
Log in

Creating “Well-Functioning” Residential Care and Defining Its Place in a System of Care

  • Published:
Child and Youth Care Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a model for understanding the elements and dynamics of a “well-functioning” residential group care resource based upon the study of 10 group care residences over a 14-month period. In addition, seven characteristics related to the differential use of foster care and residential care are presented. Finally, five key processes suggested as necessary for the creation of a system of care for young people are offered for consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aichhorn, A. (1935). Wayward youth. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, P. (Ed.) (1994). The best interests of the child: Reconciling culture and human rights. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anglin, J. P. (2002). Pain, normality and the struggle for congruence: Reinterpreting residential care for children and youth. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenitz, W. C. & Swanson, J. M. (1986).From practice to grounded theory: Qualitative research in nursing. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (Ed.). (1993). Examples of grounded theory: A reader. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (Ed.). (1994). More grounded theory methodology: A reader. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Straus, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. J. (1973). Beyond the best interests of the child. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. J. (1979). Before the best interests of the child. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, N. (1982). The troubled and troubling child. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Children and Family Development (2002). Working with community to support children, youth and families: A system of care (Companion document). May, 2002: MCFD, Government of British Columbia.

  • Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A.L. & Corbin, J. (1990).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youll, P. J. & McCourt-Perring, C. (1993). Raising voices: Ensuring quality in residential care. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James P. Anglin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anglin, J.P. Creating “Well-Functioning” Residential Care and Defining Its Place in a System of Care. Child & Youth Care Forum 33, 175–192 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CCAR.0000029689.70611.0f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CCAR.0000029689.70611.0f

Navigation