Skip to main content
Log in

Subcellular localization of chromium and nickel in root cells of Allium cepa by EELS and ESI

  • Published:
Cell Biology and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ultrastructural investigation of the root cells ofAllium cepa L. exposed to two different concentrations of chromium + nickel (Cr+Ni) (10 μmol/L and 100 μmol/L) revealed that toxic symptoms were induced by increasing heavy metal concentration and treatment time. Several significant ultrastructural changes were caused by 100 μmol/L Cr+Ni – deposition of electron dense material in cell walls; larger vacuolar precipitates surrounded by membranes inside vacuoles; increment of disintegrated organelles and high vacuolization in cytoplasm. The localization of the precipitates in which the metal ions were detected by electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) and electron spectroscopic imaging (ESI) was investigated. Chromium and nickel were localized in the electron dense precipitates of the root cells exposed to only 100 μmol/L Cr+Ni. None were found in the root cells exposed to 10 μmol/L Cr+Ni. Higher amounts of Cr+Ni were mainly accumulated in the cell walls and vacuoles of the fourth or fifth cortical layer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aoyama M, Tsuda M, Seki K, Doi S. Kurimoto Y, Tamura Y. Adsorption of Cr(VI) from dichromate solutions onto black locust leaves. Holzforschung. 2000;54:340–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barceló J, Poschenrieder C. Chromium in plants. In: Canali, S, Tittarelli, F, Sequi, P. (eds), Chromium environmental issues. Franco Angeli Publ: Milano; 1997:101–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourque G, Vittorio P, Weinberg P. Uptake of 51Cr as an indicator of metabolic change in wheat root tips. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1967;45:235–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bücking H, Beckmann S, Heyser W, Kottke I. Elemental contents in vacuolar granules of ectomycorrhizal fungi measured by EELS and EDXS. A comparison of different methods and preparation techniques. Micron. 1998;29:53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caridad-Cancela R, Abreu CA, Paz-González A. Total trace element contents in natural soil by two methods. Symposium no. 8, paper No. 1031, 17th World Congress of Soil Science, 14–21 August 2002, Thailand.

  • Cobbett CS. Phytochelatins and their roles in heavy metal detoxification. Plant Physiol. 2000;123:825–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon NE, Gazzola C, Blakeley RL, Zerner B. Jack bean urease (E.C.3.5.1.5.) a metalloenzyme. A simple biological role for nickel? J Am Chem Soc. 1975;97:4131–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo YL, Schulz R, Marschner H. Uptake, distribution and binding of cadmium and nickel in different plant species. J Plant Nutr. 1995;18:2691–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmke PA. Soil chemistry: the chemical composition of soils. In: ME Sumner (ed), Handbook of soil science. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL; 2000:B16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman EWD, Allaway WH. Growth of plants in solution culture containing low levels of chromium. Plant Physiol. 1973;52:72–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irmer U, Wachholz I, Schäfer H, Lorch DW. Influence of lead on Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Danegard (Volvocales, Chlorophyta): accumulation, toxicity and ultrastructural changes. Environ Exp Bot. 1986;26:97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H. Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL; 2001:413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krämer U, Pickering IJ, Prince RC, Raskin I, Salt DE. Subcelluar localization and speciation of nickel in hyper-accumulator and non-accumulator Thlaspi species. Plant Physiol. 2000;122:1343–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukkola E, Rautio P, Huttunen S. Stress indications in copper-and nickel-exposed Scots pine seedlings. Environ Exp Bot. 2000;43:197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levan A. Cytological reactions induced by inorganic salt solutions. Nature. 1945;156:751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu DH, Jiang WS, Li MS. Effects of trivalent and hexavalent chromium on root growth and cell division of Allium cepa. Hereditas. 1992;117:23–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu DH, Jiang WS, Guo L, Hao YQ, Lu C, Zhao FM. Effects of nickel sulfate on root growth and nucleoli in root tip cells of Allium cepa. Isr J Plant Sci. 1994;42:143–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertz W. Biological role of chromium. Fed Proc. 1967;26:186–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myttenaere C, Mousny JM. The distribution of chromium-51 in lowland rice in relation to the chemical form and the amount of stable chromium in the nutrient solution. Plant Soil. 1974;41:65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassiri Y, Mansot JL, Wéry J, Ginsburger-Vogel T, Amiard JC. Ultrastructural and electron energy loss spectroscopy studies of sequestration mechanisms of Cd and Cu in the marine diatom Skeletonema costatum. Arch Environ Toxicol. 1997;33:147–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauser WE, Ackerley CA. Localization of cadmium in granules within differentiating and mature root cells. Can J Bot. 1986;65:643–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauser WE. Phytochelatins and related peptides. Structure, biosynthesis, and function. Plant Physiol. 1995;109:1141–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan CA, Walker-Simmons M. Plant vacuoles. Meth Enzymol. 1983;96:580–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanità di Toppi L, Gabbrielli R. Response to cadmium in higher plants. Environ Expt Bot. 1999;41:105–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlösser L. Einsatz von Aldehydkarbonsäure in der Chromgerbung. In: Cot J (ed), Compendium of advanced topics on leather technology, vol 2. Associación Quimica Española de la Industria del Cuero, Barcelona, 991:1017–26.

  • Sresty TVS, Madhava Rao KV. Ultrastructural alterations in response to zinc and nickel stress in the root cells of pigeonpea. Environ Expt Bot. 1999;41:3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava S, Prakash S, Srivastava MM. Studies on mobilization of chromium with reference to its plant availability -- role of organic acids. BioMetals. 1999;12:201–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr AR. A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res. 1969;26:31-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan UW, Prochazka Z, Physiological disorders of the nicotianamine-auxotroph tomato mutant chloronerva at different levels of iron nutrition. I. Growth characteristics and physiological abnormalities as related to iron and nicotianamine supply. Acta Bot Neerl. 1989;38:147–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez MD, Poschenrieder Ch, Barceló J. Chromium VI induced structural and ultrastructural changes in bush bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Ann Bot. 1987;59:427–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolhouse HW. Toxicity and tolerance in the responses of plants to metals. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds), Physiological plant ecology. III. Responses to the chemical biological environment, Springer-Verlag: Berlin; 1983:246–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Baligar VC, Martens DC, Clark RB. Plant tolerance to nickel toxicity I. Influx, transport, and accumulation of nickel in four species. J Plant Nutr. 1996;19:73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang XE, Baligar VC, Foster JC, Martens DC. Accumulation and transport of nickel in relation to organic acid in ryegrass and maize growth with different nickel levels. Plant Soil. 1997;196:271–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng ZQ, Feng WH, Bian SP, Zheng JM, Zhang LZ, Xing SL. Study on fate of pollutant chromium in the agro-ecosystem. J Environ Sci. 1987;8:14–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, D., Kottke, I. Subcellular localization of chromium and nickel in root cells of Allium cepa by EELS and ESI. Cell Biol Toxicol 19, 299–311 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CBTO.0000004984.87619.15

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CBTO.0000004984.87619.15

Navigation