Skip to main content
Log in

Challenges in Monitoring the Natural Attenuation of Spatially Variable Plumes

  • Published:
Biodegradation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monitored natural attenuation may be applied as a risk-based remediation strategy if it can be established that contaminants are or will be reduced to some acceptable level at or before a compliance point. Contaminant attenuation is often attributed to intrinsic biodegradation, which in some circumstances may occur only at the plume fringes where electron acceptors from the surrounding uncontaminated zones mix by dispersion and diffusion with the plume. However, due to the common spatial and temporal variability exhibited by many plumes, the centreline monitoring approaches advocated in many natural attenuation protocols may be unable to detect natural attenuation occurring primarily by fringe processes. Snapshot data from a multilevel sampling well transect across an MTBE plume at Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA, USA, illustrate the difficulty of centreline monitoring and the challenge of providing sufficient detail to detect attenuation processes that may be occurring primarily at plume fringes. In a study of a phenols plume in Wolverhampton, UK, high-resolution multilevel wells demonstrated that the key biodegradation processes were restricted spatially to the upper fringe of the plume and were rate-limited by transverse dispersion and diffusion of electron acceptors into the plume. Thus the overall extent of biodegradation was considerably less than suggested by a plume-scale analysis of total electron acceptor and contaminant budgets. These examples indicate that more robust and cost-effective MNA assessments can be obtained using monitoring strategies that focus on the location of key biodegradation processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barcelona MJ, Holm TR, Schock MR & George GK (1989) Spatial and temporal gradients in aquifer oxidation-reduction conditions. Water Resour. Res. 25: 991-1003

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockelmann A, Ptak T & Teutsch G (2000). Field-Scale Quanti-fication of Contaminant Mass Fluxes and Natural Attenuation Rates Using an Integral Investigation Approach. International Conference on Groundwater Research, Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Bockelmann A, Ptak T & Teutsch G (2001) An analytical quanti-fication of mass fluxes and natural attenuation rate constants at a former gasworks site. J. Contam. Hydrol. 53: 429-453

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden RC, Daniel RA, LeBrun I & Davis CW (1997) Intrinsic biodegradation of MTBE and BTEX in a gasoline-contaminated aquifer. Water Resour. Res. 33(5): 1105-1115

    Google Scholar 

  • Buscheck TE & Alcantar CM (1995). Regression techniques and analytical solution to demonstrate intrinsic bioremediation. In: Hinchee RE, Wilson JT and Downey D (Eds) Intrinsic Biore-mediation (pp 109-116). Battelle Press, Columbus, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Champs DR, Gulens J & Jackson RE (1979) Oxidation-reduction sequences in groundwater flow systems. Can. J. Earth Sci. 16: 319-337

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapelle FH, Bradley PM, Lovley DR, O'Neill K & Landmeyer JE (2002) Rapid evolution of redox processes in a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer. Ground Water 40: 353-360

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzarelli IB, Bekins BA, Baedecker MJ, Aiken GR, Eganhouse RP & Tuccillo ME (2001) Progression of natural attenution pro-cesses at a crude-oil spill site: I. Geochemical evolution of the plume. J. Contam. Hydrol. 53: 369-385

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzarelli IB, Herman JS, Baedecker MJ & Fischer JM (1999) Geochemical heterogeneity of a gasoline-contaminated aquifer. J. Contam. Hydrol. 40: 261-284

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis GB, Barber C, Power TR, Thierrin J, Patterson BM, Rayner JL & Wu Q (1999) The variability and intrinsic remediation of a BTEX plume in anaerobic sulphate-rich groundwater. J. Contam. Hydrol. 36(3-4): 265-290

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarson MD & Cherry JA (2002) A new multilevel ground wa-ter monitoring system using multichannel tubing. Ground Water Monit. R. 22(4): 52-65

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarson MD & Mackay DM(2001) Predicting contamination using transect monitoring. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35(3): 66A-73A

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiori A & Dagan G (1999) Concentration fluctuations in transport in groundwater: comparison between theory and field experiments. Water Resour. Res. 35: 105-112

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliger C & Schumacher W (1994) Reductive dehalogenation as a respiratory process. Anton. Leeuw. 66: 239-246

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski J, Beck P & Acworth RI (1997). Vertical heterogeneity in the Botany Sands aquifer, Sydney, Australia: implications for chemical variations and contaminant delineation. In: Groundwa-ter in the Urban Environment: Problems, Processes and Manage-ment (pp 445-450). Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampbell DH, Wiedemeier TH & Hansen JE (1996) Intrinsic biore-mediation of fuel contamination in groundwater at a field site. J. Hazard. Mater. 49: 197-204

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao CM & Prosser J (2001) Evaluation of natural attenuation rate at a gasoline spill site. J. Hazard. Mater. B82: 275-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao CM & Wang CC (2000) Control of BTEX migration by in-trinsic bioremediation at a gasoline spill site. Water Res. 13: 3413-3423

    Google Scholar 

  • Landmeyer JE, Chapelle FH, Herlong HH & Bradley PM (2001) Methyl tert-butyl ether biodegradation by indigenous aquifer microorganisms under natural and artificial oxic conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35(6): 1118-1126

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Cheon JY, Lee KK, Lee SK & Lee MH (2001) Factors affecting the distribution of hydrocarbon contaminants and hydrogeochemical parameters in a shallow sand aquifer. J. Contam. Hydrol. 50: 139-158

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee & Ro (1998) Draft installation restoration program (IRP) Re-medial Investigation Report for IRP Site 60, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. City of Industry, CA, Lee and Ro, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner DN, Thornton SF, Spence MJ, Banwart SA, Bottrell SH, Higgo JJ, Mallinson HEH, Pickup RW & Williams GM (2000) Ineffective natural attenuation of degradable organic compounds in a phenol-contaminated aquifer. Ground Water 38: 922-928

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyngkilde J & Christensen TH (1992) Fate of organic contaminants in the redox zones of a landfill leachate pollution plume (Vejen, Denmark). J. Contam. Hydrol. 10: 291-307

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay DM, Wilson RD, Scow KS, Einarson MD, Fowler B & Wood IA (2001) In situremediation of MTBE at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. Contaminated Soils, Sediments, and Water, Spring: 43-46

  • Martin-Hayden JM & Robbins GA (1997) Plume distortion and ap-parent attenuation due to concentration averaging in monitoring wells. Ground Water 35: 339-346

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister PM & Chiang CY (1994) A practical approach to evaluating natural attenuation of contaminants in groundwater. Ground Water Monitor. R. XIV(2): 161-173

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire JT, Smith EW, Long DT, Hyndman DW, Haack SK, Klug MJ & Velbel MA (2000) Temporal variations in parameters reflecting terminal-electron accepting processes in an aquifer contaminated with waste fuel and chlorinated solvents. Chem. Geol. 169: 471-485

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon PB & Bruce BW (1997) Distribution of terminal electron-accepting processes in an aquifer having multiple con-taminant sources. Appl. Geochem. 12: 507-516

    Google Scholar 

  • Rügge K, Bjerg PL & Christensen TH (1995) Distribution of or-ganic compounds from municipal solid waste in the groundwater downgradient of a landfill (Grindsted, Denmark). Environ. Sci. Technol. 29: 1395-1400

    Google Scholar 

  • Salanitro JP, Johnson PC, Spinnler GE, Maner PM, Wisniewski HL & Bruce C (2000) Field-scale demonstration of enhanced MTBE bioremediation through aquifer bioaugmentation and oxygenation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34(19): 4152-4162

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber ME & Bahr JM (1999) Spatial electron acceptor variab-ility: implications for assessing bioremediation potential. Biore-mediation J. 3: 363-378

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL (1997). Determining the terminal electron-accepting reaction in the saturated subsurface. In: Hurst CJ, Knudsen GR, McInerney MJ, Stetzenbach LD and Walter MV (Eds) Manual of Environmental Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology

  • Suarez MP & Rifai HS (2002) Evaluation of BTEX remediation by natural attenuation at a coastal facility. Ground Water Monitor. R. Winter: 62-77

  • Suflita JM & Mormile MR (1993) Anaerobic biodegradation of known and potential gasoline oxygenates in the terrestrial sub-surface. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27(5): 976-978

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton SF, Lerner DN & Banwart SA (2001a) Assessing the natural attenuation of organic contaminants in aquifers using plume-scale electron and carbon balances: model development with analysis of uncertainty and parameter sensitivity. J. Contam. Hydrol. 53: 199-232

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton SF, Quigley S, Spence M, Banwart SA, Bottrell S & Lerner DN (2001) Processes controlling the distribution and natural attenuation of phenolic compounds in a deep sandstone aquifer. J. Contam. Hydrol. 53: 233-267

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemeier TH, Wilson JT, Kampbell DH, Miller RN & Hansen JE (1995) Technical protocol for implementing intrinsic remedi-ation with long-term monitorin for natural attenuation of fuel contamination dissolved in groundwater. San Antonio, Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence - Technology Transfer Division

  • Wiedemeier TH, Rifai HS, Newell CJ & Wilson JT (1999). Natural Attenuation of Fuels and Chlorinated Solvents in the Subsurface. John Wiley

  • Wiedemeier TH, Swanson MA, Wilson JT, Kampbell DH, Miller RN & Hansen JE (1996) Approximation of biodegradation rate constants for monoaromatic hydrocarbons (BTEX) in ground water. Ground Water Monitor. R. 16(3): 186-194

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GM, Pickup RW, Thornton SF, Lerner DN, Mallinson HEH, Moore Y & White C (2001) Biogeochemical character-isation of a coal-tar distillate plume. J. Contam. Hydrol. 53: 175-198

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RD, Mackay DM & Scow KM (2002) In situ MTBE bio-degradation supported by diffusive oxygen release. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36(2): 190-199

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh CK & Novak JJ (1994) Anaerobic biodegradation of gasoline oxygenates in soils. Water Environ. Res. 66(5): 744-752.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, R.D., Thornton, S.F. & Mackay, D.M. Challenges in Monitoring the Natural Attenuation of Spatially Variable Plumes. Biodegradation 15, 359–369 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOD.0000044591.45542.a9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOD.0000044591.45542.a9

Navigation