Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developmental Isolation and Subsequent Adult Behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. VI. Quantitative Variation in Cuticular Hydrocarbons

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our previous studies have demonstrated that long-term chemical contact with heterospecifics during development minimized unproductive heterospecific matings among the six Drosophila paulistorum semispecies. When socially isolated from conspecifics, discrimination significantly decreased so that more ultimately unproductive heterospecific matings occurred. Such results suggest that learning and social experiences play roles in mate recognition, using chemical information. In investigations into the development of discriminatory behavior in D. paulistorum, social experiences influence the production of cuticular hydrocarbons in both sexes among the six different semispecies of D. paulistorum. Produced by both sexes, 2-methyl triacontane has been detected from egg stages on, gradually increasing with age. However, 11-docosenyl acetate, a male pheromone, was not produced until early adult stages. There were consistent significant differences in quantities and ratios of each of these hydrocarbons among the six semispecies, contributing to their reproductive isolation. Furthermore, we found significant quantitative differences in hydrocarbons between socially isolated flies and communally raised ones: Socially isolated flies produced significantly greater quantities of hydrocarbons than communally raised flies, consistent with previous behavioral data, as isolated flies court more vigorously and often.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthony, C., and Jallon, J-M. (1982). The chemical basis for sex recognition in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 28:873-880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist, G. J., Howard, R. W., McDaniel, C. A., Remaley, S., Dwyer, L. A., and Nelson, D. R. (1980). Application of methoxymercuration-demercuration followed by massspectrometry as a convenient microanalytical technique for double bond location in insect derived alkenes. J. Chem. Ecol. 6:257-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blows, M. W., and Allan, R. A. (1998). Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. Am. Nat. 152:826-837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burla, H., Da Cunha, A. B., Cordeiro, A. R., Dobzhansky, Th., Malogolowkin, C., and Pavan, C. (1949). The willistoni group of sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution 3:300-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, T., Gheta, A., Kim, Y-K., Cella, R., and Ehrman, L. (2002). Male pheromone of Drosophila paulistorum. Dros. Info. Serv. 84:50-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, T., Herndon, L. A., Heifetz, Y., Partridge, L., and Wolfner, M. F. (2001). The Acp26Aa seminal fluid protein is a modulator of early egg hatchability in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 268:1647-1654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, M., and Jallon, J-M. (1990). Pheromones, mate recognition and courtship stimulation in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Anim. Behav. 39:1058-1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. A., Crittenden, A. P., and Mah, K. (1994). Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265:1461-1464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curcillo, P. G., and Tompkins, L. (1987). The ontogeny of sex appeal in Drosophila melanogaster males. Behav. Genet. 17:81-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., and Powell, J. (1975). The willistoni group of sibling species of Drosophila. In R. C. King (.), Handbook of genetics, Vol. 3, New York: Plenum, pp. 589-622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., and Spassky, B. (l959). Drosophila paulistorum, a cluster of species in status nascendi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 45:419-428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., Ehrman, L., Pavlovsky, O., and Spassky, B. (1964). The superspecies Drosophila paulistorum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 51:3-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. (1961). The genetics of sexual isolation in Drosophila paulistorum. Genetics 46:1025-1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. (1965). Direct observation of sexual isolation between allopatric and sympatric strains of the different Drosophila paulistorum races. Evolution 19:459-464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L., and Kim, Y-K. (1998). Courtship. In G. Greenberg & M. M. Haraway (s.), Comparative psychology. New York: Garland, pp. 637-648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L., and Powell, J. (1982). The Drosophila willistoni species group. In M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson, and J. N. Thompson, Jr. (s.), The genetics and biology of Drosophila, 3b, New York: Academic Press, pp. 193-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L., and Wasserman, M. (1987). The significance of asymmetrical sexual isolation. In M. Hecht, B. Wallace, and R. J. MacIntyre (s.), Evolutionary biology, 21, New York: Plenum, pp. 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L., Somerson, N., and Gottlieb, F. J. (1986). Reproductive isolation in a neotropical insect: Behavior and microbiology. In M. Huettel (.), Evolutionary genetics of invertebrate behavior: progress and prospects, New York: Plenum, pp. 97-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elens, A. A., and Wattiaux, J. M. (1964). Direct observation of sexual isolation. Dros. Info. Serv. 39:118-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J. A., and Basolo, A. L. (1998). Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:415-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etges, W. J., and Jackson, L. L. (2001). Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation in Drosophila mojavensis cluster species. J. Chem. Ecol. 27:2125-2149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuveur, J-F. (1991). Genetic control of pheromones in Drosophila simulans. I. Ngbo, a locus on the second chromosomes. Genetics 128:293-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferveur, J-F. (1997). The pheromonal role of cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila melanogaster. BioEssays 19:353-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferveur, J-F., and Sureau, G. (1996). Simultaneous influence on male courtship of stimulatory and inhibitory pheromones, produced by live sex-mosaic Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 263:967-973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferveur, J-F., Cobb, M., Boukella, H., and Jallon, J-M. (1996). Worldwide variation in Drosophila melanogaster sex pheromone: behavioral effects, genetic bases and evolutionary consequences. Genetica 97:73-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gailey, D. A., Lacaillade, R. C., and Hall, J. C. (1986). Chemosensory elements of courtship in normal and mutant, olfaction-deficient Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 16:375-404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, R. J., and Ferveur, J-F. (2000). Courtship in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34:205-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. C. (1994). The mating of a fly. Science 264:1702-1714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgie, M., Chenoweth, S., and Blows, M. W. (2000). Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290:519-521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J., and Reichhart, J. (1997). Drosophila immunity. Trends Cell Biol. 7:309-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jallon, J-M. (1984). A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behav. Genet. 14:441-478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jallon, J-M., and David, J. R. (1987). Variations in cuticular hydrocarbons among the eight species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Evolution 41:294-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jallon, J-M., and Hotta, Y. (1979). Genetic and behavioral studies of female sex appeal in Drosophila. Behav. Genet. 9:257-275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y-K. (2004).Drosophila kin recognition. (submitted).

  • Kim, Y-K., and Ehrman, L. (1998). Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. IV. Courtship. Behav. Genet. 28:57-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y-K., and Ehrman, L. (1999). Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. V. Surveys of the six Drosophila willistoni sibling species. Behav. Genet. 29:65-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y-K., Ehrman, L., and Koepfer, H. R. (1992). Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. I. Survey of the six semispecies. Behav. Genet. 22:545-556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y-K., Ehrman, L., and Koepfer, H. R. (1996a). Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. II. Prior experience. Behav. Genet. 26:15-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y-K., Koepfer, H. R., and Ehrman, L. (1996b). Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. III. Alternative rearing. Behav. Genet. 26:27-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koref-Santibañez, S. (1972). Courtship behavior in the semispecies of the superspecies Drosophila paulistorum. Evolution 26:108-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khush, R. S., and Lemaitre, B. (2000). Genes that fight infection. Genet. Droso. Immun. 16:442-449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T. A., and Toolson, E. C. (1990). Temperature effects on epicuticular hydrocarbons and sexual isolation in Drosophila mojavensis. In R. J. MacIntyre, W. T. Starmer, and J. S. F. Barker (s.), Ecology and evolutionary genetics of Drosophila, New York: Plenum, pp. 315-331.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobert, S. P., and Tompkins, L. (1983). Courtship of young males is ubiquitous in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 13:517-523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noor, M. A. F., and Coyne, J. A. (1996). Genetics of a difference in cuticular hydrocarbons between Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genet. Res. 68:117-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechiné, J-M., Antony, C., and Jallon, J-M. (1988). Precise characterization of cuticular compounds in young Drosophila by mass spectometry. J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1071-1085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, D., and Potts, W. K. (1998). Chemical signals and parasitemediated sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:391-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, C., and Ehrman, L. (1969). Sexual selection in Drosophila. In Th. Dobzhansky, M. K. Hecht, and W. C. Steere (s.), Evolutionary biology, 3, New York: Appleton-Centry-Crofts, pp. 177-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif, M., Linsenmair, E., and Heisenberg, M. (2002). Evolutionary significance of courtship conditioning in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 63:143-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, M. G., and Gleason, J. M. (1995). Rapid evolution of courtship song pattern in Drosophila willistoi sibling species. J. Evol. Biol. 8:463-479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F. W., and Reeve, E. (1952). Studies in quantitative inheritance. I. The effects of selection on wing and thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet. 50:414-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaner, A. M., Dixon, P. D., Graham, K. J., and Jackson, L. L. (1989). Components of the courtship-stimulating pheromone blend of young male Drosophila melanogaster: (Z)-13-tritriacontene and (Z)-11-tritriacontene. J. Insect Physiol. 35:341-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., Richmond, R. C., and Carlson, D. A. (1988). Pheromones exchanged during mating: a mechanism for mate assessment in Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 36:1164-1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, B. C. (2000). Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:397-402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981). Biometry, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, A. (1965). Geographic variation of quantitative characters in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 19:300-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L. (1989). Homosexual courtship in Drosophila. In T. J. Carew and D. B. Kelley (s.), Perspectives in neural systems and behavior, New York: Alan R. Liss, pp. 229-248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L., and Hall, J. C. (1981). The different effects on courtship of volatile compounds from mated and virgin Drosophila females. J. Insect Physiol. 27:17-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L., Hall, J. C., and Hall, L. M. (1980). Courtship stimulating volatile compounds from normal and mutant Drosophila. J. Insect Physiol. 26:689-697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L., Siegel, R. W., Gailey, D. A., and Hall, J. C. (1983). Conditioned courtship in Drosophila and its mediation by association of chemical cues. Behav. Genet. 13:565-578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tram, U., and Wolfner, M. F. (1998). Seminal fluid regulation of female sexual attractiveness in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:4051-4054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck, E. (1922). The history of human marriage. New York: Allerton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, A. P. (1995). Sexual attraction and childhood association: a Chinese brief for Edward Westermarck. Standford: Standford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawistowski, S. (1988). A replication demonstrating reduced courtship of Drosophila melanogaster by associative learning. J. Comp. Psychol. 102:174-176.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA

    Yong-Kyu Kim

  2. Department of Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA

    Dennis R. Phillips

  3. Division of Natural Sciences, State University of New York, Purchase, New York, 10577, USA

    Taina Chao & Lee Ehrman

Authors
  1. Yong-Kyu Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dennis R. Phillips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Taina Chao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lee Ehrman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, YK., Phillips, D.R., Chao, T. et al. Developmental Isolation and Subsequent Adult Behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. VI. Quantitative Variation in Cuticular Hydrocarbons. Behav Genet 34, 385–394 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BEGE.0000023644.87050.1a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BEGE.0000023644.87050.1a

Search

Navigation