Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The dependence receptor hypothesis

  • Published:
Apoptosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new family of functionally-related receptors has recently been proposed, dubbed dependence receptors. These proteins, only some of which share sequence similarities, display the common property that they transduce two different intracellular signals: in the presence of ligand, these receptors transduce a positive signal leading to survival, differentiation or migration; conversely, in the absence of ligand, the receptors initiate or amplify a signal for programmed cell death. Thus cells that express these proteins at sufficient concentrations manifest a state of dependence on their respective ligands. The signaling that mediates cell death induction upon ligand withdrawal is in large part uncharacterized, but typically includes a required interaction with, and cleavage by, specific caspases. Here, we review the current knowledge concerning dependence receptors, including the shared mechanisms for cell death induction and their potential relevance in nervous system development and regulation of tumorigenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bredesen DE, Mehlen P, Rabizadeh S. Apoptosis and dependence receptors. A molecular basis for cellular addiction. Phys Rev 2004 (in press).

  2. Sauer H, Nishimura MC, HSP. Deletion of the p75NTR gene attenuates septal cholinergic cell loss in mice heterozygous for a deletion of the NGF gene. SocNeurosciAbs 1996; 513–514.

  3. Rabizadeh S, et al. Induction of apoptosis by the low-affinity NGF receptor. Science 1993; 261: 345–348.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mehlen P, et al. The DCC gene product induces apoptosis by a mechanism requiring receptor proteolysis. Nature 1998; 395: 801–804.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Llambi F, Causeret F, Bloch-Gallego E, Mehlen P. Netrin-1 acts as a survival factor via its receptors UNC5H and DCC. Embo J 2001; 20: 2715–2722.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ellerby LM, et al. Kennedy's disease: caspase cleavage of the androgen receptor is a crucial event in cytotoxicity. J Neurochem 1999; 72: 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bordeaux MC, et al. The RET proto-oncogene induces apoptosis: A novel mechanism for Hirschsprung disease. Embo J 2000; 19: 4056–4063.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stupack DG, Puente XS, Boutsaboualoy S, Storgard CM, Cheresh DA. Apoptosis of adherent cells by recruitment of caspase-8 to unligated integrins. J Cell Biol 2001; 155: 459–470.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ruoslahti E, Reed JC. Anchorage dependence, integrins, and apoptosis. Cell 1994; 77: 477–478.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thibert C, et al. Inhibition of neuroepithelial patched-induced apoptosis by sonic hedgehog. Science 2003; 301: 843–846.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Levi-Montalcini R. The nerve growth factor: Its mode of action on sensory and sympathetic nerve cells. Harvey Lect 1966; 60: 217–259.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chao MV, et al. Gene transfer and molecular cloning of the human NGF receptor. Science 1986; 232: 518–521.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Radeke MJ, Misko TP, Hsu C, Herzenberg LA, Shooter EM. Gene transfer and molecular cloning of the rat nerve growth factor receptor. Nature 1987; 325: 593–597.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hempstead BL, Martin-Zanca D, Kaplan DR, Parada LF, Chao MV. High-affinity NGF binding requires coexpression of the trk proto-oncogene and the low-affinity NGF receptor. Nature 1991; 350: 678–683.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibanez CF. Structure-function relationships in the neurotrophin family. J Neurobiol 1994; 25: 1349–1361.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee FS, Kim AH, Khursigara G, Chao MV. The uniqueness of being a neurotrophin receptor. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11: 281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Verdi JM, et al. p75LNGFR regulates Trk signal transduction and NGF-induced neuronal differentiation in MAH cells. Neuron 1994; 12: 733–745.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cha MV. The p75 neurotrophin receptor. J Neurobiol 1994; 25: 1373–1385.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barrett GL, Bartlett PF. The p75 nerve growth factor receptor mediates survival or death depending on the stage of sensory neuron development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 6501–6505.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rabizadeh S, Bredesen DE. Ten years on: Mediation of cell death by the common neurotrophin receptor p75(NTR). Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2003; 14: 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yeo TT, et al. Absence of p75NTR causes increased basal forebrain cholinergic neuron size, choline acetyltransferase activity, and target innervation. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 7594–7605.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Naumann T, et al. Complete deletion of the neurotrophin receptor p75NTR leads to long-lasting increases in the number of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 2409–2418.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Casaccia-Bonnefil P, Carter BD, Dobrowsky RT, Chao MV. Death of oligodendrocytes mediated by the interaction of nerve growth factor with its receptor p75. Nature 1996; 383: 716–719.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Frade JM, Rodriguez-Tebar A, Barde YA. Induction of cell death by endogenous nerve growth factor through its p75 receptor. Nature 1996; 383: 166–168.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bredesen DE, Rabizadeh S. p75NTR and apoptosis: Trk-dependent and Trk-independent effects. Trends Neurosci 1997; 20: 287–290.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bredesen DE, et al. p75NTR and the concept of cellular dependence: Seeing how the other half die. Cell Death Differ 1998; 5: 365–371.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fearon ER, et al. Identification of a chromosome 18q gene that is altered in colorectal cancers. Science 1990; 247: 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Serafini T, et al. The netrins define a family of axon outgrowthpromoting proteins homologous to C. elegans UNC-6. Cell 1994; 78: 409–424.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ramon y Cajal S. Histologie du System Nerveux de l'Homme et des Vertebres. Consejo Superior de investigacione Cientificas, Madrid 1909.

  30. Tessier-Lavigne M, Placzek M, Lumsden AG, Dodd J, Jessell TM. Chemotropic guidance of developing axons in the mammalian central nervous system. Nature 1988; 336: 775–778.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Serafini T, et al. Netrin-1 is required for commissural axon guidance in the developing vertebrate nervous system. Cell 1996; 87: 1001–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  32. de la Torre JR, et al. Turning of retinal growth cones in a netrin-1 gradient mediated by the netrin receptor DCC. Neuron 1997; 19: 1211–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Colamarino SA, Tessier-Lavigne M. The axonal chemoattractant netrin-1 is also a chemorepellent for trochlear motor axons. Cell 1995; 81: 621–629.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mehlen P, Mazelin L. The dependence receptors DCC and UNC5H as a link between neuronal guidance and survival. Biol Cell 2003 (in press).

  35. Chan SS, et al. UNC-40, a C. elegans homolog of DCC (Deleted in Colorectal Cancer), is required in motile cells responding to UNC-6 netrin cues. Cell 1996; 87: 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vogelstein B, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectaltumor development. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 525–532.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vogelstein B, et al. Allelotype of colorectal carcinomas. Science 1989; 244: 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 1990; 61: 759–767.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cho KR, et al. The DCC gene: Structural analysis and mutations in colorectal carcinomas. Genomics 1994; 19: 525–531.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fearon ER. DCC: Is there a connection between tumorigenesis and cell guidance molecules? Biochim Biophys Acta 1996; 1288: M17–M23.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mehlen P, Fearon ER. Role of the dependence receptor DCC in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. J Clin Oncology 2004 (in press).

  42. Shibata D, et al. The DCC protein and prognosis in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1727–1732.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sun XF, Rutten S, Zhang H, Nordenskjold B. Expression of the deleted in colorectal cancer gene is related to prognosis in DNA diploid and low proliferative colorectal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1745–1750.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Klingelhutz AJ, Smith PP, Garrett LR, McDougall JK. Alteration of the DCC tumor-suppressor gene in tumorigenic HPV-18 immortalized human keratinocytes transformed by nitrosomethylurea. Oncogene 1993; 8: 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Velcich A, Corner G, Palumbo L, Augenlicht L. Altered phenotype of HT29 colonic adenocarcinoma cells following expression of the DCC gene. Oncogene 1999; 18: 2599–2606.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Riggins GJ, et al. Mad-related genes in the human. Nat Genet 1996; 13: 347–349.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Thiagalingam S, et al. Evaluation of candidate tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 18 in colorectal cancers. Nat Genet 1996; 13: 343–346.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Fazeli A, et al. Phenotype of mice lacking functional Deleted in colorectal cancer (Dcc) gene. Nature 1997; 386: 796–804.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chen YQ, et al. Induction of apoptosis and G2/M cell cycle arrest by DCC. Oncogene 1999; 18: 2747–2754.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Forcet C, et al. The dependence receptor DCC (deleted in colorectal cancer) defines an alternative mechanism for caspase activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 3416–3421.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Liu J, et al. Mediation of the DCC apoptotic signal by DIP13 alpha. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 26281–26285.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hedgecock EM, Culotti JG, Hall DH. The unc-5, unc-6, and unc-40 genes guide circumferential migrations of pioneer axons and mesodermal cells on the epidermis in C. elegans. Neuron 1990; 4: 61–85.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Leonardo ED, et al. Vertebrate homologues of C. elegans UNC-5 are candidate netrin receptors. Nature 1997; 386: 833–838.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hong K, et al. A ligand-gated association between cytoplasmic domains of UNC5 and DCC family receptors converts netrin-induced growth cone attraction to repulsion. Cell 1999; 97: 927–941.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Tanikawa C, Matsuda K, Fukuda S, Nakamura Y, Arakawa H. p53RDL1 regulates p53-dependent apoptosis. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5: 216–223.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Takahashi M, Cooper GM. Ret transforming gene encodes a fusion protein homologous to tyrosine kinases. Mol Cell Biol 1987; 7: 1378–1385.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Takeichi M. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science 1991; 251: 1451–1455.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Manie S, Santoro M, Fusco A, Billaud M. The RET receptor: Function in development and dysfunction in congenital malformation. Trends Genet 2001; 17: 580–589.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Baloh RH, et al. TrnR2, a novel receptor that mediates neurturin and GDNF signaling through Ret. Neuron 1997; 18: 793–802.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Schuchardt A, D'Agati V, Larsson-Blomberg L, Costantini F, Pachnis V. Defects in the kidney and enteric nervous system of mice lacking the tyrosine kinase receptor Ret. Nature 1994; 367: 380–383.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sanchez MP, et al. Renal agenesis and the absence of enteric neurons in mice lacking GDNF. Nature 1996; 382: 70–73.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Cacalano G, et al. GFRalpha 1 is an essential receptor component for GDNF in the developing nervous system and kidney. Neuron 1998; 21: 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Mulligan LM, et al. Germ-line mutations of the RET protooncogene in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. Nature 1993; 363: 458–460.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Romeo G, et al. Point mutations affecting the tyrosine kinase domain of the RET proto-oncogene in Hirschsprung's disease. Nature 1994; 367: 377–378.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Pasini B, Ceccherini I, Romeo G. RET mutations in human disease. Trends Genet 1996; 12: 138–144.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hood JD, Cheresh DA. Role of integrins in cell invasion and migration. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2: 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Stupack DG, Cheresh DA. Get a ligand, get a life: Integrins, signaling and cell survival. J Cell Sci 2002; 115: 3729–3738.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Jessell TM. Neuronal specification in the spinal cord: Inductive signals and transcriptional codes. Nat Rev Genet 2000; 1: 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Murone M, Rosenthal A, de Sauvage FJ. Sonic hedgehog signaling by the patched-smoothened receptor complex. Curr Biol 1999; 9: 76–84.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ingham PW, McMahon AP. Hedgehog signaling in animal development: Paradigms and principles. Genes Dev 2001; 15: 3059–3087.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Marigo V, Davey RA, Zuo Y, Cunningham JM, Tabin CJ. Biochemical evidence that patched is the Hedgehog receptor. Nature 1996; 384: 176–179.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Stone DM, et al. The tumour-suppressor gene patched encodes a candidate receptor for Sonic hedgehog. Nature 1996; 384: 129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Taipale J, Cooper MK, Maiti T, Beachy PA. Patched acts catalytically to suppress the activity of Smoothened. Nature 2002; 418: 892–897.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Charrier JB, Teillet MA, Lapointe F, Le Douarin NM. Defining subregions of Hensen's node essential for caudalward movement, midline development and cell survival. Development 1999; 126: 4771–4783.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Charrier JB, Lapointe F, Le Douarin NM, Teillet MA. Anti-apoptotic role of Sonic hedgehog protein at the early stages of nervous system organogenesis. Development 2001; 128: 4011–4020.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Wicking C, McGlinn E. The role of hedgehog signalling in tumorigenesis. Cancer Lett 2001; 173: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Lee DK, Chang C. Molecular communication between androgen receptor and general transcription machinery. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2003; 84: 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Clark PE, Irvine RA, Coetzee GA. The androgen receptor CAG repeat and prostate cancer risk. Methods Mol Med 2003; 81: 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  79. La Spada AR, Wilson EM, Lubahn DB, Harding AE, Fischbeck KH. Androgen receptor gene mutations in Xlinked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Nature 1991; 352: 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Fischbeck KH. Kennedy disease. J Inherit Metab Dis 1997; 20: 152–158.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Zupan AA, Johnson EM, Jr. Evidence for endocytosisdependent proteolysis in the generation of soluble truncated nerve growth factor receptors by A875 human melanoma cells. J Biol Chem 1991; 266: 15384–15390.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Kanning KC, et al. Proteolytic processing of the p75 neurotrophin receptor and two homologs generates C-terminal fragments with signaling capability. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 5425–5436.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Hofmann K, Tschopp J. The death domain motif found in Fas (Apo-1) and TNF receptor is present in proteins involved in apoptosis and axonal guidance. FEBS Lett 1995; 371: 321–323.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Rabizadeh S, et al. Neurotrophin dependence domain: A domain required for the mediation of apoptosis by the p75 neurotrophin receptor. J Mol Neurosci 2000; 15: 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Coulson EJ, et al. Chopper, a new death domain of the p75 neurotrophin receptor that mediates rapid neuronal cell death. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 30537–30545.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Williams ME, Strickland P, Watanabe K, Hinck L. UNC5H1 induces apoptosis via its juxtamembrane domain through an interaction with NRAGE. J Biol Chem (2003).

  87. Salehi AH, et al. NRAGE, a novel MAGE protein, interacts with the p75 neurotrophin receptor and facilitates nerve growth factor-dependent apoptosis. Neuron 2000; 27: 279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Salvesen GS, Dixit VM. Caspases: Intracellular signaling by proteolysis. Cell 1997; 91: 443–446.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Yang X, Chang HY, Baltimore D. Autoproteolytic activation of pro-caspases by oligomerization. Mol Cell 1998; 1: 319–325.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Salvesen GS, Duckett CS. IAP proteins: Blocking the road to death's door. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3: 401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Bredesen DE. Keeping neurons alive: The molecular control of apoptosis. The Neuroscientist 1996; 181–190.

  92. Wang JJ, et al. Dimerization-dependent block of the proapoptotic effect of p75(NTR). J Neurosci Res 2000; 60: 587–593.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Stein E, Zou Y, Poo M, Tessier-Lavigne M. Binding of DCC by netrin-1 to mediate axon guidance independent of adenosine A2B receptor activation. Science 2001; 291: 1976–1982.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Keino-Masu K, et al. Deleted in Colorectal Cancer (DCC) encodes a netrin receptor. Cell 1996; 87: 175–185.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Bloch-Gallego E, Ezan F, Tessier-Lavigne M, Sotelo C. Floor plate and netrin-1 are involved in the migration and survival of inferior olivary neurons. J Neurosci 1999; 19: 4407–4420.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Yee KT, Simon HH, Tessier-Lavigne M, O'Leary DM. Extension of long leading processes and neuronal migration in the mammalian brain directed by the chemoattractant netrin-1. Neuron 1999; 24: 607–622.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Jiang Y, Min-tsai L, Gershon MD. Netrins and DCC in the guidance of migrating neural Crest-Derived Cells in the developing bowel and pancreas. Development 2003 (submitted).

  98. Pelet A, et al. Various mechanisms cause RET-mediated signaling defects in Hirschsprung's disease. J Clin Invest 1998; 101: 1415–1423.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Charron F, Stein E, Jeong J, McMahon AP, Tessier-Lavigne M. The morphogen sonic hedgehog is an axonal chemoattractant that collaborates with netrin-1 in midline axon guidance. Cell 2003; 113: 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Wang KC, Kim JA, Sivasankaran R, Segal R, He Z. P75 interacts with the Nogo receptor as a co-receptor for Nogo, MAG and OMgp. Nature 2002; 420: 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Hopker VH, Shewan D, Tessier-Lavigne M, Poo M, Holt C. Growth-cone attraction to netrin-1 is converted to repulsion by laminin-1. Nature 1999; 401: 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Pasterkamp RJ, Peschon JJ, Spriggs MK, Kolodkin AL. Semaphorin 7A promotes axon outgrowth through integrins and MAPKs. Nature 2003; 424: 398–405.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Pflug BR, Onoda M, Lynch JH, Djakiew D. Reduced expression of the low affinity nerve growth factor receptor in benign and malignant human prostate tissue and loss of expression in four human metastatic prostate tumor cell lines. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 5403–5406.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Giovannucci E, et al. The CAG repeat within the androgen receptor gene and its relationship to prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 3320–3323.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Ookawa K, et al. Concordant p53 and DCC alterations and allelic losses on chromosomes 13q and 14q associated with liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma. Int J Cancer 1993; 53: 382–387.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Thiebault K, et al. The netrin-1 receptors UNC5H are putative tumor suppressors controlling cell death commitment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 4173–4178.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Apoptosis/Differentiation Laboratory, Equipe labelisée ‘La Ligue’, Molecular and Cellular Genetic Center, CNRS UMR 5534, University of Lyon, 69622, Villeurbanne, France

    P. Mehlen

  2. The Buck Institute for Age Research, Novato, CA, 94945, USA;

    D. E. Bredesen

  3. University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA

    D. E. Bredesen

Authors
  1. P. Mehlen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. E. Bredesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehlen, P., Bredesen, D.E. The dependence receptor hypothesis. Apoptosis 9, 37–49 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:APPT.0000012120.66221.b2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:APPT.0000012120.66221.b2

Search

Navigation