Skip to main content
Log in

Ownership and its Impact on Coping with Financial Crisis: Differences in State-, Mixed-, and Privately-Owned Enterprises in Thailand

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate turnarounds have been studied widely in Western contexts, but few empirical studies detail turnaround experience in non-western countries, especially those undergoing or recovering from financial crisis. An assumption in recent privatization policies has been that change in ownership triggers a form of performance reversal or turnaround. Here, we compare firms with three different forms of ownership two years after the financial crisis in Thailand. This study assesses the impact of ownership differences on the level of corporate entrepreneurship, human resource management practices, and worker effort among state-, mixed- and privately-owned enterprises in Thailand. The results suggest cautious optimism about changes in ownership as a potential means for triggering organizational changes that lead to increased productivity for threatened economies. Mixed ownership may be an effective substitute for private ownership or, alternately, an effective transitional form of restructuring state enterprises in preparation for private ownership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • E. Abrahamson, “Management fashion,” Academy of Management Review, pp. 586-612, 1996.

  • A.A. Alchian and H. Demsetz, “The property rights paradigm,” Journal of Economic History, pp. 16-27, 1973.

  • H.E. Aldrich, Organization and Environments, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.E. Aldrich, Organizations Evolving. Sage Publications, 1999.

  • R. Anderson, S. Djanmkov, G. Pohl, and S. Claessons, Privatization and Restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe. World Bank: Washington, DC, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Arens and K. Brouthers, “Key stakeholder theory and state-owned enterprise versus private firms,” Management International Review, pp. 377-394, 2001.

  • V.L. Barker and I.M. Duhaime, “Strategic change in the turnaround process,” Strategic Management Journal, pp. 13-38, 1997.

  • M. Beer and N. Nohria, “Cracking the code of change,” Harvard Business Review. May/June, pp. 135-141, 2000.

  • A. Boardman, C. Eckel, and A. Vining, “The advantages and disadvantages of mixed enterprises,” Research in International Business and International Relations, pp. 221-244, 1986.

  • R.A. Burgelman, “Strategy making as a social learning process: The case of internal corporate venturing,” Interfaces, pp. 74-85, 1988.

  • K.S. Cameron, D.A. Whetten, and M.U. Kim, “Organizational dysfunctions of Decline,” Academy of Management Journal, pp. 126-138, 1987.

  • C.M. Christensen, The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.C. Cooper and W.C. Dunkelberg, “Entrepreneurship and paths to business ownership,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 53-68, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.C. Cooper and D.E. Schendel, “Strategic responses to technological threat,” Business Horizons, pp. 61-69, 1976.

  • J.G. Covin and D.P. Slevin, “A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp. 7-25, 1991.

  • M.I. Cragg and I.J.A. Dyck, “Management control and privatization in the United Kingdom,” Rand Journal of Economics, pp. 475-497, 1999.

  • M. Cyert Richard and J.G. March, The Behavioral Theory of The Firm, 2nd edition. Blackwell Publishers, 1992.

  • P.D. DiMaggio and W.W. Powell, “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields,” American Sociological Review, pp. 147-160, 1983.

  • A. Downs, Inside Bureaucracy. Little, Brown and Company: Boston, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.G. Evans, “Organizational Behavior: The Central Role of Motivation,” Journal of Management, pp. 203-222, 1986.

  • A. Gupta and V. Govindarajan, “Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation,” Academy of Management Journal, pp. 695-714, 1984.

  • W.D. Guth and I.C. MacMillan, “Strategy implementation versus middle management self-interest,” Strategic Management Journal, pp. 313-327, 1986.

  • D.C. Hambrick and S. Schecter, “Turnaround strategies in mature industrial-product business units,” Academy of Management Journal, pp. 231-248, 1983.

  • M.T. Hannan and J. Freeman, “Structural inertia and organizational change,” American Sociological Review, pp. 149-164, 1984.

  • C. Hofer, “Turnaround Strategies,” Journal of Business Strategy, pp. 19-31, 1980.

  • M.A. Huselid, “The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance,” Academy of Management Journal, pp. 635-672, 1995.

  • M.A. Huselid and S.E. Jackson, “Technical and strategic human resource management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance,” Academic of Management Journal, pp. 171-188, 1997.

  • M.C. Jensen and Meckling, “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, pp. 305-360, 1976.

  • S.R. Kale and J.H. Mulherin, “The government as a shareholder: The case from the United States,” Journal of Law and Economics, pp. 1-22, 1997.

  • R.M. Kanter, The Dance of Change. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kelly and T.L. Amburgey, “Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategy,” Academy of Management Journal, pp. 591-612, 1991.

  • G. Knight, “Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation,” Journal of Business Venturing, pp. 213-225, 1997.

  • J. Kornai, The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Lawler, Y. Atmiyanada, and M. Zaidi, “Human resource management practices in multinational and local firms in Thailand,” Journal of Southeast Asia Business, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 16-40, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Livesay, “Entrepreneurial history,” in C. Kent, D. Sexton, and K. Vesper, (eds.): The Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. Prentice Hall: New York, NY, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.T. Lumpkin and G.G. Dess, “Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance,” Academy of Management Review, pp. 135-172, 1996.

  • J.G. March, “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning,” Organizational Science, pp. 71-87, 1991.

  • W. McKinley, J. Zhao, and K.G. Rust, “A socio-cognitive interpretation of organizational downsizing,” Academy of Management Review, pp. 227-243, 2000.

  • W. Megginson and J. Netter, “Privatisation and growth in world equity markets,” Privatisation Yearbook International 1999. Thomson Financial Services: London, pp. 5-6, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Meggison and J. Netter, “From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization,” Journal of Economic Literature, pp. 321-389, 2001.

  • A.D. Meyer, G.R. Brooks, and J.R. Goes, “Environmental jolts and industry revolutions: Organizational responses to discontinuous change,” Strategic Management Journal (Special Issue: Summer), pp. 93-110, 1990.

  • M.W. Meyer and L.G. Zucker, Permanently Failing Organizations. Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Miles, Leading Corporate Transformation: A Blueprint For Business Renewal. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.R. Mitchell, “Motivation: New Directions for theory, research, and practice,” Academy of Management Review, pp. 80-88, 1982.

  • J. Moore, “British privatization: Taking capitalism to the people,” Harvard Business Review, (Jan.-Feb.): pp. 115-124, 1992.

  • J.R. Nellis, Time to Rethink Privatization in Transitional Economies? International Finance Corporation: Washington, DC, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.M. O'Neill and D.J. Lenn, “Voices of survivors: Words that downsizing CEOs should hear,” Academy of Management Executive, pp. 23-34, 1995.

  • H.M. O'Neill, R.W. Pouder, and A.K. Buccholtz, “Patterns in the difffusion of strategies across organizations: Insights from the innovation literature,” Academy of Management Review, pp. 98-114, 1998.

  • J.L. Perry and L.W. Porter, “Factors affecting the context for motivation in public organizations,” Academy of Management Review, pp. 89-98, 1982.

  • J. Pfeffer, Competitive Advantage Through People. Harvard Business School Press, 1994.

  • J. Pfeffer, “Seven practices of successful organizations,” California Management Review, vol. 40, pp. 96-124, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pfeffer, The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First. Harvard Business School Press, 1998.

  • C.C. Pinder, Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior. Prentice Hall, 1997.

  • L.W. Porter, E.E. Lawler, and J.R. Hackman, Behavior in Organizations. McGraw Hill: New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.B. Quinn, “Managing innovation: Controlled chaos,” Harvard Business Review, May/June, 1985.

  • H.G. Rainey, “Public management: Recent research on the political context and managerial roles, structures, and behaviors,” Journal of Management, pp. 229-250, 1989.

  • R. Ramamurti, “Why are developing countries privatizing?” Journal of International Business Studies, pp. 225-249, 1992.

  • D.K. Robbins and J.A. Pearce II., “Turnaround: Retrenchment and recovery,” Strategic Management Journal, pp. 287-309, 1992.

  • D.A. Rondinelli, “Capacity building in emerging market economies: The second wave of reform,” Business & the Contemporary World, vol. VI, no. 3, pp. 153-167, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Rondinelli, “Privatization, governance, and public management: The challenges ahead,” Business & the Contemporary World, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 149-170, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Rondinelli and M. Iacono, “Strategic Management of privatization: A framework for planning and implementation,” Public Administration and Development, vol. 16, pp. 247-263, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Rondinelli and V. Priebjrivat, “Assessing privatization opportunities in emerging markets: The Dynamics of change in Thailand,” Thunderbird International Business Review, vol. 14, pp. 623-650, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Rondinellii and Yurkiewicz, “Privatization and economic restructuring in Poland: An assessment of transition policies,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 55, pp. 145-160, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.S. Schuler, “Strategic human resource management: Linking people with the needs of the business,” Organizational Dynamics, pp. 18-32, 1992.

  • R.S. Schuler and I.C. MacMillan, “Gaining competitive advantage through human resource practices,” Human Resource Management, pp. 241-255, 1984.

  • J.A. Schumpeter, (originally published in 1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Introduction and pp. 56-156, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • B.M. Staw, L.E. Sandelands, and J.E. Dutton, “Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 501-524, 1981.

  • A.S. Stinchcombe, “Social structure and organization,” in G.M. James (ed.), Handbook of Organizations. Rand McNally: Chicago, pp. 153-193, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Stopford and C.W. Baden-Fuller, “Creating corporate entrepreneurship,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 15, pp. 521-536, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.I. Sutton and T. D'Aunno, “Decreasing organizational size: To untangle or not to untangle? Building a model of work force reduction that is grounded in pertinent theory and data: Reply to McKinley,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 112, 1992.

  • J.G. Thompson, Organizations in Action. Harcourt, Brace & World: New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.L. Tian, “State shareholding and corporate performance: A study of a unique Chinese data set,” Working paper, London Business School, 2000.

  • D. Ulrich, “Measuring human resources: An overview of practice and a prescription for results,” Human Resource Management, pp. 303-320, 1997.

  • J. Walsh, “Management turnover following mergers and acquisitions,” Strategic Management Journal, pp. 173-183, 1988.

  • C.D. Wolfrom, “Increases in executive pay following privatization,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, pp. 327-361, 1998.

  • World Bank, Bureaucrats in Business, World Bank: Washington, DC, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Neill, H.M., Rondinelli, D.A. & Wattanakul, T. Ownership and its Impact on Coping with Financial Crisis: Differences in State-, Mixed-, and Privately-Owned Enterprises in Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 21, 49–74 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:APJM.0000024077.35529.66

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:APJM.0000024077.35529.66

Navigation