Abstract
This article outlines the ecological and ethnobotanical characteristics of the monkey-puzzle tree (Araucariaaraucana), a long-lived conifer of great importance to the indigenous population living in and around its range in the southern Andes. The article also considers the pre-Columbian and historical use of indigenous fire technology. Conclusive evidence of indigenous burning is unavailable. However, our knowledge of native fire ecology elsewhere and our understanding of monkey-puzzle's ecological response to fire suggest that indigenous people probably burned in the past to facilitate the growth of monkey-puzzle trees relative to other species. The obstacles to recovering and redeploying a defunct fire-based production strategy include the vulnerable condition of monkey-puzzle stands after decades of intense logging and burning (by non-indigenous settlers), inadequate access to land and resources by the region's indigenous inhabitants, livestock pressure, depletion of game animals that were once hunted with fire, and reluctance by indigenous people to embrace old production strategies that have been supplanted by new ones based on domesticated animals and crop cultivation. Prescribed burns in selected areas offer an effective way to assess the feasibility of indigenous burning as an alternative to more conventional development initiatives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aagesen, D. L. (forthcoming). “Tradition, timber and territory in the southern Andes: Waging battle over the monkey-puzzle tree.” In M. K. Steinberg (ed.), Forests, Fields, and Fish: Politicized Indigenous Landscapes. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Aagesen, D. L. (1998a). “On the northern fringe of the South American temperate forest: The history and conservation of the monkey-puzzle tree.” Environmental History 3(1): 64–85.
Aagesen, D. L. (1998b). “Indigenous resource rights and conservation of the monkey-puzzle tree: A case study from southern Chile.” Economic Botany 52(2): 146–160.
Alvarez, G. (1980-1986). Neuquén: su historia, geografía y toponimia. 6 vols. Neuquén: Gobierno de la Provincia del Neuquén.
Angli, J. (1918). “La Araucaria araucana (Mol.) Koch y su resina: Sus relaciones con las demás coníferas.” Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias (Córdoba) 23: 1–84.
Armesto, J. J., P. Léon Lobos, and M. K. Arroyo (1995). “Los bosques templados del sur de Chile y Argentina: Una isla biogeográfica.” In J. J. Armesto, C. Villagran, and M. K. Arroyo (eds.), Ecología de los bosques nativos de Chile (pp. 23–28). Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.
Bengoa, J. (1985). Historia del pueblo mapuche. Santiago: Ediciones SUR.
Brose, P., T. Schulter, D. Van Lear, and J. Berst (2001). “Bringing fire back: The changing regimes of Appalachian mixed-oak forests.” Journal of Forestry 99(11): 30–35.
Cabrera, A. L. (1953). “Esquema fitogeográfico de la RepÚblica Argentina.” Revista del Museo de la Ciudad Eva Perón 8(33): 87–168.
Curruhuinca, R. (1986). Sayhueque: El ultimo cacique. Buenos Aires: Editorial Plus Ultra.
de la Cruz, L. (1835). Descripción de la naturaleza de los terrenos que se comprenden en los Andes, poseidos por los peguenches, y los demás espacios hasta el Río Chadileubu. Buenos Aires: Imprenta del Estado.
Dey, D. C. and R. P. Guyette (2000). “Anthropogenic fire history and red oak forests in south-central Ontario.” The Forestry Chronicle 76(2): 339–347.
Gusinde, M. (1936). “Plantas medicinales que los indios araucanos recomiendan.” Antropos 5: 851–873.
Heusser, C. J. (1983). “Quaternary history of the monkeypuzzle tree (Araucaria araucana (Mol.) C. Koch) in Chile and Argentina.” Grant proposal submitted to the National Science Foundation, Environmental Biology Unit, Washington, DC.
Hoffman, A. (1982). Flora silvestre de Chile: zona austral. Santiago: Ediciones Fundación Claudio Gay.
Keeley, J. E. (2002). “Native American impacts on fire regimes of the California coastal ranges.” Journal of Biogeography 29(3): 303–320.
Kitzberger, T. and T. T. Veblen (1999). “Fire-induced changes in northern Patagonian landscapes.” Landscape Ecology 14: 1–15.
Kozdon, P. (1958). “Las coníferas autóctonas y su progresiva desaparición en la cordillera andina.” Montes 14(84): 463–472.
Lewis, H. T. (1985). “Why Indians burned: Specific versus general reasons.” In Proceedings-Symposium and Workshop on Wilderness Fire, November 15-18, 1983, (pp. 75–80). Missoula, Montana: United States Department of Agriculture
Lyon, P. J. (ed.) (1974). Native South Americans: Ethnology of the Least Known Continent. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Molina, R. and M. Correa (1992). Territorio y comunidades pehuenches del Alto Bío-Bío. Santiago: Comisión Especial de Pueblos Indígenas.
Montaldo, P. R. (1974). “La bioecología de la Araucaria araucana (Mol.) C. Koch,” Boletín 46/48. Merida, Venezuela: Instituto Forestal Latinoamericano de Investigaciones y Capacitación.
Montaldo, P. R. (1951). Condiciones ecológicas y dasonómicas de la especie Araucaria araucana (Mol.) Koch. Bachelor's thesis, Departamento de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Chile.
Mutarelli, E. J. and E. R. Orfila (1970). “Ensayo de tratamientos experimentales en bosques de Araucaria araucana (Mol.) C. Koch en la zona del Lago Moquehue, Provincia del Neuquén, Argentina.” Revista Forestal Argentina 14: 109–117.
Neruda, P. (1964). Nuevas odas elementales. Buenos Aires: Editorial Losada.
Olson, J. S. (1991). The Indians of Central and South America: An Ethnohistorical Dictionary. New York: Greenwood Press.
Osidala, N., R. Romero, and C. Corvalán (1992). “Parque Nacional Lanín: Manejo de los recursos naturales con pobladores.” In S. Amend and T. Amend (eds.), ĺEspacios sin habitantes? Parques nacionales de América del Sur (pp. 57–69). Caracas: Editorial Nueva Sociedad.
Poeppig, E. (1836). Reise in Chile, Peru und auf dem Amazonen Strome. Leipzig: N.p. Cited in Patricio R. Montaldo (1974). “La bioecología de la Araucaria araucana (Mol.) C. Koch,” Boletín 46/48. Merida, Venezuela: Instituto Forestal Latinoamericano de Investigaciones y Capacitación.
Preece, N. (2002). “Aboriginal fires in monsoonal Australia from historical accounts.” Journal of Biogeography 29(3): 321–336.
Puente, M. (1980). “Utilización de un bosque del tipo araucaria con criterio de permanencia,” Boletín Técnico 57. Santiago: Departamento de Ciencias Forestales (Universidad de Chile).
Radovich, J. C. and A. O. Balazote (1992). “El pueblo mapuche en la actualidad.” In J. C. Radovich and A. O. Balazote (eds.), La problemática indígena (pp. 159–187). Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina.
Record, S. J. and R. W. Hess (1943). Timbers of the New World. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Rodríguez, R., O. Matthei, and M. Quezada (1983). Flora arbórea de Chile. Concepción, Chile: Editorial de la Universidad de Concepción.
Santos, J. F. (1991). “La etnía pehuenche y su etorno.” Unpublished report prepared for the EULA Project, Concepción, Chile.
Serret, A. (1984). Regeneración espontánea del pehuen (Araucaria araucana) en 4 sitios forestales del Parque Nacional Lanín, Provincia del Neuquén. Bachelor's thesis, Departamento de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires.
Torrejón, F. and T. González (1993). “Los pehuenches: Una vision historica.” In F. Faranda and O. Parra (eds.), La región del Biobío, un espacio y una historia (pp. 71–125). Santiago: Grafica Andes.
Tortorelli, L. A. (1942). “La explotación racional de los bosques de araucaria del sur.” Servir 6: 1–53.
Veblen, T. T. (1982). “Regeneration patterns in Araucaria araucana forests in Chile.” Journal of Biogeography 9: 11–28.
Veblen, T. T. and D. C. Lorenz (1988). “Recent vegetation changes along the forest/steppe ecotone of northern Patagonia.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 78(1): 93–111.
Veblen, T. T. and R. Delmastro (1976). “Los recursos genéticos de Araucaria araucana en Chile.” Información Sobre Recursos Genéticos Forestales (Food and Agriculture Organization) 5: 2–5.
Veblen, T. T. and T. Kitzberger (1997). “History and ecology of fire in southern Argentina.” Paper presented at the II Southern Connection Congress on Southern Temperate Biota and Ecosystems. January 6-11, Valdivia, Chile.
Veblen, T. T., B. R. Burns, T. Kitzberger, and R. Villalba (1995). “The ecology of the conifers of southern South America.” In N. J. Enright and R. S. Hill (eds.), Ecology of the Southern Conifers (pp. 120–155). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Veblen, T. T., T. Kitzberger, R. Villalba, and J. Donnegan (1999). “Fire history in northern Patagonia: The roles of humans and climatic variation.” Ecological Monographs 69(1): 47–60.
Villalobos, S. (1989). Los pehuenches en la vida fronteriza. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.
Weber, C. (1983). El patrimonio natural de Chile: Características, importancia y alternativas para su preservación.
Bachelor's thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Veterinarias y Forestales, Universidad de Chile.
Whitlock, C. and M. A. Knox (2002). “Prehistoric burning in the Pacific Northwest: Human versus climatic Influences.” In T. R. Vale (ed.), Fire, Native Peoples, and The Natural Landscape (pp. 195–231). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Wilson, D. J. (1999). Indigenous South Americans of the Past and Present: An Ecological Perspective. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Yibarbuk, D., P. J. Whitehead, J. Russell-Smith, D. Jackson, C. Godjuwa, A. Fisher, P. Cooke, D. Choquenot, and D. M. J. S. Bowman (2001). “Fire ecology and Aboriginal land management in central Arnhem Land, Northern Australia: A tradition of ecosystem management.” Journal of Biogeography 28(3): 325–343.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aagesen, D. Burning monkey-puzzle: Native fire ecology and forest management in northern Patagonia. Agriculture and Human Values 21, 233–242 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AHUM.0000029402.85972.6c
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AHUM.0000029402.85972.6c