Skip to main content
Log in

Knowing, Believing, and Understanding: What Goals for Science Education?

Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What is a teacher to do when confronted with a student who says “I understand that theory (e.g., evolution), but I don't believe it”? The purpose of this article is to provide a rationale for answering this question. First we describe the various ways in which the terms know/knowledge and believe/belief are used and summarize the distinctions commonly used to differentiate between these terms. Second, we propose that the primary goal of science education should be student knowledge and understanding, which we will argue typically (but not always) involves belief and typically (but not always) guides action. In those instances where a student evidences a meaningful understanding but still disbelieves, we further propose that the appropriate goal is for students to believe that the theory in question affords the best current scientific account of the relevant phenomena based on the available empirical evidence. Third, we evaluate instructional procedures for addressing the issues of knowledge, belief, and understanding recommended by recent authors before providing our own suggestions to teachers that we hope will be both more philosophically sound and more effective in the classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, J.E.: 2002, Belief's Own Ethics, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P.A. & Dochy, F.J.R.C.: 1995, ‘Conceptions of Knowledge and Beliefs: A Comparison across Varying Cultural and Educational Communities’, American Educational Research Journal 32, 413–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P.A., Schallert, D.L., & Hare, V.C.: 1991, ‘Coming to Terms: How Researchers in Learning and Literacy Talk about Knowledge’, Review of Educational Research 61, 315–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alters, B.J.: 1997, ‘Should Student Belief of Evolution be a Goal’, Reports of the National Center for Science Education 17, 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arons, A.: 1990, A Guide to Introductory Physics, Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, B.A. & Anderson, C.W.: 1990, ‘Student Conceptions of Natural Selection and its Role in Evolution’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27, 415–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clouser, R.A.: 1991, The Myth of Religious Neutrality: An Essay on the Hidden Role of Religious Belief in Theories, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W.W.: 1994, ‘Point: Belief, Understanding, and the Teaching of Evolution’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31, 583–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W.W.: 2000, ‘The Nature of Science and the Role of Knowledge and Belief’, Science & Education 9, 219–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.A.: 2001, ‘The Goal of Evolution Instruction: Should We Aim for Belief or Scientific Literacy’, Reports of the National Center for Science Education 21, 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1910, How We Think, D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evnine, S.J.: 2001, ‘Learning from One's Mistakes: Epistemic Modesty and the Nature of Belief’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82, 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, C.: 2001, ‘Knowledge, Belief and Understanding in Science Education’, in Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Group.

  • Gess-Newsome, J.: 1999, ‘Teachers' Knowledge and Beliefs about Subject Matter and its Impact on Instruction’, in J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (eds.), Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Construct and its Implication for Science Education, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 51–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, R.G.: 2001, ‘Habits of Mind Associated with Science and Religion: Implications for Science Education’, in Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching Group,Denver,CO.

  • Hart, H.: 1980, The Impasse of Rationality Today, The Association for the Advancement of Christian Scholarship, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B.K. & Pintrich, P.R.: 1997, ‘The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning’, Review of Educational Research 67, 88–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Körner, S.: 1966, Experience and Theory: An Essay in the Philosophy of Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A.E. & Weser, J.: 1990, ‘The Rejection of Nonscientific Beliefs about Life: Effects of Instruction and Reasoning Skills’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27, 589–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, K.: 1990, Theory of Knowledge, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, A.A.: 1950, The House at Pooh Corner, Dutton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N.: 1993, Educating for Intelligent Belief or Unbelief, Teachers College Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J.S. & Koballa, T.R.: 1992, ‘Science Educators Use of the Concept of Belief’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.

  • Scheffler, I.: 1965, in M.L. Borrowman, I. Scheffler, & E.J. Shoben (eds.), Conditions of Knowledge: An Introduction to Epistemology and Education, Keystones of Education, Scott, Foresman and Company, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, W.M. & Huff, P.A.: 1995, Knowledge and Belief in America: Enlightenment Traditions and Modern Religious Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H.: 1985, ‘What is the Question Concerning the Rationality of Science?’ Philosophy of Science 52, 517–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H.: 1987, Relativism Refuted: A Critique of Contemporary Epistemological Relativism, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H.: 1988, Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking, and Education, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H.: 1997, Rationality Redeemed?: Further Dialogues on an Educational Ideal, Routledge, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H.: 1998, ‘Knowledge, Truth and Education’, in D. Carr (ed.), Education, Knowledge and Truth: Beyond the Postmodern Impasse, Routledge, London, pp. 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.U.: 1994, ‘Belief, Understanding, and the Teaching of Evolution’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31, 591–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.U. & Scharmann, L.C.: 1999, ‘Defining versus Describing the Nature of Science: A Pragmatic Analysis for Classroom Teachers and Science Educators’, Science Education 83, 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.U., Siegel, H., and McInerney, J.D.: 1995, ‘Foundational Issues in Evolution Education’, Science and Education 4, 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southerland, S.A., Sinatra, G.M., and Matthews, M.R.: 2001a, ‘Belief, Knowledge, and Science Education’, Educational Psychology Review 13, 325–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southerland, S.A., Sinatra, G.M., and Matthews, M.R.: 2001b, Belief, Knowledge, and Science Education, Unpublished draft of paper later published in Educational Psychology Review.

  • Strike, K.A. & Posner, G.J.: 1985, ‘A Conceptual Change View of Learning and Understanding’, in L.H.T. West and A.L. Pines (eds.), Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 211–231.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, M.U., Siegel, H. Knowing, Believing, and Understanding: What Goals for Science Education?. Science & Education 13, 553–582 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCED.0000042848.14208.bf

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCED.0000042848.14208.bf

Navigation