Skip to main content
Log in

Dialogue's Impact on the Quality of Relationships

  • Published:
Educational Research for Policy and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of an action research that examines teachers' perception of the quality of dialogue and how it impacts on the quality of relationships in a primary school in Singapore. The paper explores how school leaders can facilitate dialogue and also discusses the issues and factors that affect teachers' perception of dialogue. Analysis of the data obtained through a questionnaire and face-to-face interviews shows that the more favourable the perception of dialogue amongst teachers, the more favourable is their perception of the quality of relationships in the school. The implication for school leaders is that by developing a higher quality of dialogue, a better school climate is fostered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C. and Schon, D. A. (1996). Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method & Practice. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1985). Unfolding Meaning. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boles, K. & Troen, V. (1992). How teachers make restructuring happen. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canady, R. L. & Rettig, M. D. (1995). The power of innovative scheduling. Educational Leadership, 53(3), 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J. L. (1996). The who, what and why of site-based management. Educational Leadership, 53(4), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, T. E. & Peterson, K. D. (1994). The Leadership Paradox: Balancing Logic and Artistry in Schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1997). What's worth fighting for in the Principalship? (2nd Ed.) New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, W. N. (1993). Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together. New York: Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. H. (1997). What is your organization's core theory of success? The Systems Thinker, 8(3), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, A. J. (2000). Teachers' Perceptions, School Climate and Principal's Self-reported leadership styles based on Three Empirical Measures of Perceived Leadership. Dissertation completed at the Centre for Education, Widener University, Chester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagor, R. D. (1992). Three Principals who make a difference. Educational Leadership, 49, 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Currency, Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P., Kleiner A., Roberts, C., Ross, R. B. & Smith, B. J. (1994). The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization. New York: Currency, Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J. and Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that Learn: A fifth Discipline Fieldbook for Educators, Parents and Everyone who cares about Education. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. C. & Piele, P. K. (1996). School Leadership Handbook for Excellence. University of Oregon: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.

  • Wynne, E. A. (1980). Looking at Schools: Good, Bad, and Indifferent. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovitch, D. (1999). The Magic of Dialogue-Transforming Conflict into Cooperation. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seet, C., Tee, N.P. Dialogue's Impact on the Quality of Relationships. Educational Research for Policy and Practice 2, 205–214 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ERPP.0000034520.27915.b3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ERPP.0000034520.27915.b3

Navigation