Advertisement

Crime Mapping and the Training Needs of Law Enforcement

  • Jerry H. Ratcliffe
Article

Abstract

This paper explores some of the more recent developments within crime mapping and the broader application of geographical information technology within law enforcement. The information technology (IT) revolution and the reduction in computing costs since the 1980s has brought a range of analytical tools within the budgets of most police services, and one of the most significant changes has been in the way that spatial data are handled. Law enforcement has strong geographic currents at all levels of the organisation, and this paper examines three applications of geographical information systems (GIS) within policing: hotspot mapping; CompStat; and geographic profiling. The paper concludes by discussing the future training needs using a simple model of intelligence-led crime reduction. This model suggests that training for managers to enable a greater understanding of the analyses presented to them, and how to use mapping to further crime prevention and reduction, may be as important as increasing the technical ability of crime analysts. The challenge for the immediate future of crime reduction practice in law enforcement is less to worry about the training of analysts, and more to address the inability of law enforcement management to understand and act on the crime analysis they are given.

CompStat crime mapping geographic profiling GIS police leadership police management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Barker, M., The criminal range of small town burglars. In: D. Canter and L. Alison (Eds), Profiling Property Crimes, pp. 59–73. London: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. Bennell, C. and D. Canter, Linking commercial burglaries by modus operandi: Tests using regression and ROC analysis. Science and Justice, 42(3), pp. 153–164, 2002.Google Scholar
  3. Bottoms, A.E. and P.Wiles, Explanations of crime and place. In: D.J. Evans, N.R. Fyfe and D.T. Herbert (Eds), Crime, Policing and Place: Essays in Environmental Criminology, pp. 11–35. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. Bottoms, A.E. and P. Wiles, Environmental criminology. In: M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, pp. 620–656. London: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  5. Bowers, K.J. and A. Hirschfield, Exploring the link between crime and disadvantage in north-west England: An analysis using geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13(2), pp. 159–184, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. Brantingham, P.J. and P.L. Brantingham, Environmental Criminology. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  7. Brantingham, P.J. and P.L. Brantingham, Patterns in Crime. New York: Macmillan, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. Brantingham, P.L. and P.J. Brantingham, Environment, routine, and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. In: R.V. Clarke and M. Felson (Eds), Routine Activity and Rational Choice, pp. 259–294. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
  9. Canter, D., T. Coffey, M. Huntley and C. Missen, Predicting serial killers' home base using a decision support system. Quantitative Criminology, 16(4), pp. 457–478, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. Canter, D. and P. Larkin, The environmental range of serial rapists. Environmental Psychology, 13(1), pp. 63–69, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. Chilvers, M. and D. Weatherburn, Do targeted arrests reduce crime? Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice (NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research), 63, pp. 1–16, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. Chrisman, N., Exploring Geographic Information Systems. New York: Wiley, 2002.Google Scholar
  13. Clarke, R.V. and M. Felson, Introduction: Criminology, routine activity, and rational choice. In: R.V. Clarke and M. Felson (Eds), Routine Activity and Rational Choice, Vol. 5, pp. 259–294. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, L.E. and M. Felson, Social change and crime rate trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review, 44, pp. 588–608, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. Cornish, D. and R. Clarke, The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. Craglia, M., R. Haining and P. Wiles, A comparative evaluation of approaches to urban crime pattern analysis. Urban Studies, 37(4), pp. 711–729, 2000.Google Scholar
  17. Ekblom, P., Getting the best out of crime analysis. Police Research Group: Crime Prevention Unit Series, 10, pp. 1–42, 1988.Google Scholar
  18. Fischer, M.M., H.J. Scholten and D. Unwin, Geographic information systems, spatial data analysis and spatial modelling: An introduction. In: M.M. Fischer, H.J. Scholten and D. Unwin (Eds), Spatial Analytical Perspectives on GIS, pp. 3–19. London: Taylor and Francis, 1996.Google Scholar
  19. Flood, B., Strategic aspects of the UK National Intelligence Model. In: J.H. Ratcliffe (Ed.), Strategic Thinking in Criminal Intelligence, pp. 37–52. Sydney: Federation Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. Fotheringham, A.S., C. Brunsdon and M. Charlton, Geographically Weighted Regression. Chichester: Wiley, 2002.Google Scholar
  21. Gatrell, A.C. and C.E. Dunn, Geographical information systems and spatial epidemiology: Modelling the possible association between cancer of the larynx and incineration in North-East England. In: M.J.C. DeLepper, H.J. Scholten and R.M. Stern (Eds), The Added Value of Geographical Information Systems in Public and Environmental Health, pp. 215–235. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
  22. Gill, P., Rounding up theUusual Suspects? Developments in Contemporary Law Enforcement Intelligence. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar
  23. Goldstein, H., Problem-Orientated Policing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990.Google Scholar
  24. Harries, K., Mapping Crime: Principles and Practice. Washington DC: US Department of Justice, 1999.Google Scholar
  25. Hirschfield, A., P. Brown and P. Todd, GIS and the analysis of spatially-referenced crime data: Experiences in Merseyside, UK. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9(2), pp. 191–210, 1995.Google Scholar
  26. HMIC, Northamptonshire Police: Intelligence Led Policing and Proactive Investigation of Crime. London: Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary, 2001.Google Scholar
  27. ICJIA, STAC User Manual. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, 1996. 82 JERRY H. RATCLIFFE Jeffery, C.R. and D.L. Zahm, Crime prevention through environmental design, opportunity theory, and rational choice models. In: R.V. Clarke and M. Felson (Eds), Routine Activity and Rational Choice, 323-350. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
  28. LaVigne, N.G. and E.R. Groff, The evolution of crime mapping in the United States. In: A. Hirschfield and K. Bowers (Eds), Mapping and Analysing Crime Data, pp. 203–221. London: Taylor and Francis, 2001.Google Scholar
  29. Mayne, S.R., Instructions and Orders. London: Metropolitan Police, 1829.Google Scholar
  30. McDowell, D., Strategic Intelligence: A Handbook for Practitioners, Managers and Users. Cooma: Istana Enterprises, 1998.Google Scholar
  31. McGuire, P.G., The New York Police Department COMPSTAT Process. In: V. Goldsmith, P.G. McGuire, J.H. Mollenkopf and T.A. Ross (Eds), Analyzing CrimePatterns:Frontiers of Practice, pp. 11–22. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2000.Google Scholar
  32. McLafferty, S., D.Williamson, J.H. Mollenkopf and T.A. Ross, Identifying crime hot spots using kernel smoothing. In: V. Goldsmith, P.G. McGuire, J.H. Mollenkopf and T.A. Ross (Eds), Analyzing Crime Patterns: Frontiers of Practice, pp. 77–85. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2000.Google Scholar
  33. NCIS, The National Intelligence Model. London: National Criminal Intelligence Service, 2000.Google Scholar
  34. Nelson, A.L., R.D.F. Bromley and C.J. Thomas, Identifying micro-spatial and temporal patterns of violent crime and disorder in the British city centre. Applied Geography, 21(3), pp. 249–274, 2001.Google Scholar
  35. Newman, G., Introduction: Towards a theory of situational crime prevention. In: G. Newman, R. Clarke and S.G. Shoham (Eds), Rational Choice and Situational Crime Prevention: Theoretical Foundations, pp. 1–23. Dartmouth: Ashgate, 1997.Google Scholar
  36. NZP, Briefing to the Incoming Minister.Wellington: NewZealand Police 2002 (http://www.police.govt.nz/resources/2002/bim/bim.php).Google Scholar
  37. Openshaw, S., GIS crime and GIS criminality. Environment and Planning A, 25(4), pp. 451–458, 1993.Google Scholar
  38. Openshaw, S., A. Cross, M. Charlton and C. Brunsdon, Lessons Learnt from a Post Mortem of a Failed GIS.2nd National Conference and Exhibition of the AGI, Brighton, October 1990.Google Scholar
  39. Ratcliffe, J.H.,Onthe accuracy of TIGER-type geocoded address data in relation to cadastral and census areal units. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(5), pp. 473–485, 2001.Google Scholar
  40. Ratcliffe, J.H., Aoristic signatures and the temporal analysis of high volume crime patterns. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(1), pp. 23–43, 2002.Google Scholar
  41. Ratcliffe, J.H., Intelligence-led policing. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 248, Australian Institute of Criminology, 2003.Google Scholar
  42. Ratcliffe, J.H.,The Hotspot Matrix: A framework for the spatio-temporal targeting of crime reduction. Police Practice and Research, 5(1), pp. 7–25, 2004a.Google Scholar
  43. Ratcliffe, J.H. (Ed.), Strategic Thinking in Criminal Intelligence. Sydney: Federation Press, 2004b.Google Scholar
  44. Ratcliffe, J.H. and M.J. McCullagh, Hotbeds of crime and the search for spatial accuracy. Geographical Systems, 1(4), pp.385–398, 1999.Google Scholar
  45. Rengert, G.F., The journey to crime: Conceptual foundations and policy implications. In: D.J. Evans, N.R. Fyfe and D.T. Herbert (Eds), Crime, Policing and Place: Essays in Environmental Criminology, pp. 109–117. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  46. Rich, T.F., The Use of Computerized Mapping in Crime Control and Prevention Programs. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, 1995.Google Scholar
  47. Robinson, M.B., Lifestyles, routine activities, and residential burglary victimization. Journal of Crime and Justice, 22(1), pp. 27–56, 1999.Google Scholar
  48. Rossmo, D.K., Overview: Multivariate spatial profiles as a tool in crime investigation. In: C. Block, M. Daboub and S. Fregly (Eds), Crime Analysis Through Computer Mapping, pp. 65–97. Chicago: PERF, 1995a.Google Scholar
  49. Rossmo, D.K., Place, space, and police investigations: Hunting serial violent criminals. In: D. Weisburd and J.E. Eck (Eds), Crime and Place, pp. 217–235. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press, 1995b.Google Scholar
  50. Rossmo, D.K., Geographic profiling. In: J.L. Jackson and D.A. Bekerian (Eds), Offender Profiling: Theory, Research and Practice, pp. 159–175. New York: Wiley, 1997.Google Scholar
  51. Rossmo, D.K., Geographic Profiling. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  52. Santtila, P.,A. Zappal`a, M. Laukkanenc and M. Picozzi, Testing the utility of a geographical profiling approach in three rape series of a single offender:Acase study. Forensic Science International, 131(1), pp. 42–52, 2003.Google Scholar
  53. Scott, M.S., Problem-Oriented Policing: Reflections on the First 20 Years.Washington, DC: COPS Office, 2000.Google Scholar
  54. Sherman, L.W., D. Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter and S. Bushway, Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, 1998.Google Scholar
  55. Tilley, N., Problem-Oriented Policing, Intelligence-Led Policing and the National Intelligence Model. London: Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, 2003.Google Scholar
  56. Walsh,W.F., Compstat: An analysis of an emerging police managerial paradigm. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 24(3), pp. 347–362, 2001.Google Scholar
  57. Weisburd, D., Translating Research Into Practice: Reflections on the Diffusion of Innovation in Crime Mapping. Dallas: International Crime Mapping Research Conference, Texas, CMRC: NIJ, 2001.Google Scholar
  58. Weisburd, D. and L. Green, Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), pp. 711–735, 1995.Google Scholar
  59. Weisburd, D., L. Maher, L. Sherman, M. Buerger, E. Cohn and A. Petrisino, Contrasting crime general and crime specific theory: The case of hot spots of crime. In: F. Alder and W.S. Laufer (Eds), New Directions in Criminological Theory. Advances in Criminological Theory, Vol. 4, pp. 45–70. London: Transaction Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
  60. Weisburd, D. and T. McEwen, Introduction: Crime mapping and crime prevention. In: D. Weisburd and T. McEwen (Eds), Crime Mapping and Crime Prevention, Vol. 8, pp. 1–23. New York: Criminal Justice Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  61. Whyte, D., Behind the Line of Truncheons': Crimes of the Powerful and the Policing of Valid Knowledge. British Criminology Conference,Keele: The British Society of Criminology, 2003.Google Scholar
  62. Wiles, P. and A. Costello, The 'road to nowhere': The Evidence for Travelling Criminals. London: Research, Development and Statistics Directorate (Home Office), 2000.Google Scholar
  63. Yokota, K. and S.Watanabe, Computer-based retrieval of suspects using similarity of modus operandi. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 4(1), pp. 5–15, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerry H. Ratcliffe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations