Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal allocation procedure in ranked set sampling for unimodal and multi-modal distributions

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This paper presents a ranked set sample allocation procedure that is optimal for a number of nonparametric test procedures. We define a function that measures the amount of information provided by each observation given the actual joint ranking of all the units in a set. The optimal ranked set sample allocates order statistics by maximizing this information function. This paper shows that the optimal allocation of order statistics in a ranked set sample is determined by the location of the mode(s) of the underlying distribution. For unimodal, symmetric distributions, optimal allocation always quantifies the middle observation(s). If the underlying distribution with cdf F is a multi-modal distribution with modes \(R, \ldots ,R_k \), then the optimal allocation procedure quantifies observations at \(mF(R_1 ), \ldots ,mF(R_1 )\) in a set of size m. We provide similar results for unimodal, asymmetric distributions. We also propose a new sign test which considers the relative positions of the quantified observations from the same cycle in a ranked set sample. The proposed sign test provides improvement in the Pitman efficiency over the ranked set sample sign test of Hettmansperger (1995). It is shown that the information optimal allocation procedure induced by Pitman efficiency is equivalent to the optimal allocation procedure induced by the information criteria. We show that the finite sample distribution of the proposed test based on this optimal design is binomial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhoj, D.S. (1997) New parametric ranked set sampling. Journal of Applied Statistical Science, 6, 275-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, L. (1998) A ranked-set sample signed-rank statistic. J. Nonpar. Statist., 9, 295-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, L.L. and Wolfe, D.A. (1992) Nonparametric two-sample procedures for ranked-set samples data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 87, 552-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, L.L. and Wolfe, D.A. (1994) The effect of imperfect judgment ranking on properties of procedures based on the ranked-set samples analog of the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon statistic. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 89, 168-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, T.R. and Clutter, J.L. (1972) Ranked-set sampling theory with order statistics background. Biometrics, 28, 545-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halls, L.K. and Dell, T.R. (1966) Trial of ranked-set sampling for forage yields. Forest Science, 12, 22-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettmansperger, T.P. (1995) The ranked-set sample sign test. J. Nonpar. Stat., 4, 263-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, A., Patil, G.P., and Taillie, C. (1997) Unequal allocation models for ranked set sampling with skew distributions. Biometrics, 53, 123-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koti, M.K. and Babu, G.J. (1996) Sign test for ranked-set sampling. Commun. Statist. Theory Methods, 25, 1617-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, G.A. (1952) A method of unbiased selective sampling, using ranked sets. Austral. J. Agric. Res., 3, 385-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk, Ö. (1999a) One and two sample sign tests for ranked set samples with selective designs. Commun. Statist. Theory Meth., 28, 1231-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk, Ö. (1999b) Two sample inference based on one sample ranked set sample sign stastistic. J. Nonpar. Statist., 10, 197-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk, Ö. and Wolfe, D.A. (2000a) Optimal ranked set sampling protocol for the signed rank test. Tentatively accepted, J. Statist. Plann. Inference.

  • Öztürk, Ö. and Wolfe, D.A. (2000b) Alternative ranked set sampling protocols for the sign test. Statist. Prob. Letters, 47, 15-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, L. (1995) Parametric ranked set sampling. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math, 47, 465-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, S.L. (1977) Ranked set sampling with concomitant variables. Commun. Statist. Theory Methods, 6, 1207-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, S.L. and Sager, T.W. (1988) Characterizations of a ranked-set sample with application to estimating distribution functions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 83, 374-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, K. and Wakimoto, K. (1968) On unbiased estimates of the population mean based on the sample stratified by means of ordering. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 20, 1-31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O¨ztu¨rk, O., Wolfe, D.A. Optimal allocation procedure in ranked set sampling for unimodal and multi-modal distributions. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 7, 343–356 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026519531699

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026519531699

Navigation