Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Behavioural studies of MHC‐congenic mice

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavioural studies of MHC‐congenic mice and rats have focused primarily on mate choice and the ability to discriminate between strains by their urine odours, but these strains may differ in other behaviours, such as activity and ultrasonic vocalizations. Ivanyi (1978, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lord. 202, 117–158) has reviewed the physiological differences associated with the MHC, many of which could influence behaviour. We have started a systematic study of behavioural development and adult behaviour in MHC‐congenic mice. A developmental test battery (growth, rate, locomotion, grooming, eye opening, ultrasonic vocalizations, etc.) was used to examine differences between C57BL/6J vs. B6‐H‐2bm1 and C57BL/10SnJ vs. B10.BR/sgSnJ mice. A test battery of spontaneous behaviours (activity, exploration, ultrasonic vocalizations, etc.) was used to examine behavioural differences between adult C57BL/6J vs. B6‐H‐2bm1 and C57BL/10SnJ vs. B10.BR/sgSnJ mice. Differences in development and in adult behaviours between these MHC-congenic strains is discussed in relation to possible neural, endocrine and immune system differences. Future studies will compare MHC-congenic mice on levels of anxiety, sociosexual behaviour and on learning paradigms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeelen, J.H.F. van & A.H. Schoones, 1977. Ontogeny of behavior in two inbred lines of selected mice. Dev. Psychobiol. 10: 17-23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ammassari-Teule, M. & A. Caprioli, 1985. Spatial learning, memory, maze running strategies and cholinergic mechanisms in two inbred strains of mice. Behav. Brain Res. 17: 9-16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J., 1973. Tests for emotionality in rats and mice: A review. Anim. Behav. 21: 205-235.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, G.K., K. Yamazaki, & E.A. Boyse, 1985. The chemosensory recognition of genetic individuality. Sci. Am. 253: 86-92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolivar, V.J. & R.E. Brown, 1994. The ontogeny of ultrasonic vocalizations and other behaviors in male jimpy (jp/Y) mice and their normal male littermates. Dev. Psychobiol. 27: 101- 110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolivar, V.J., K. Manley & J.C. Fentress, 1996. The development of swimming behavior in the neurological mutant weaver mouse. Dev. Psychobiol. 29: 123-137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.E., B. Roser & P.B. Singh, 1990. The MHC and individual odors in rats, pp. 228-243, in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates VI, edited by D.W. MacDonald, D. Muller-Schwarze and S.E. Natynczuyk. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlier, M., M. Nosten-Bertrand & C. Michard-Vanhee, 1992. Separating genetic effects from maternal environmental effects, pp. 111-126 in Techniques for the Genetic Analysis of Brain and Behavior: Focus on the Mouse, edited by D. Goldowitz, D. Wahlsten and R.E. Wimer. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castanon, N., F. Perez-Diaz & P. Mormede, 1995. Genetic analysis of the relationship between behavioral and neuroendocrine traits in Roman high and lowavoidance rat lines. Behav. Genet. 25: 371-384.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • File, S.E. & A.G. Wardill, 1975. The reliability of the hole-board apparatus. Psychopharmacologia (Berlin) 44: 47-51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M.W., 1966. Neuro-behavioral ontogeny: A synthesis of ethological and neurophysiological concepts. Brain Res. 2: 3-20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldbard, S.B., K.M. Verbanac & C.M. Warner, 1982. Role of the H-2 complex in preimplantation mouse embryo development. Biol. Reprod. 26: 591-596.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldbard, S.B. & C.M. Warner, 1982. Genes affect the timing of early mouse embryo development. Biol. Reprod. 27: 419-424.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hausheer-Zarmakupi, Z., D.P. Wolfer, M.-C. Leisinger-Trigona & H.-P. Lipp, 1996. Selective breeding for extremes in open-field activity of mice entails a differentiation of hippocampal mossy fibers. Behav. Genet. 26: 167-176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, D.K. & T.P. Corfman, 1980. An overview of neurobiological comparisons in mouse strains. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 4: 421-435.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivani, P., 1978. Some aspects of the H-2 system, the major histocompatibility system in the mouse. Proc. R. Soc. London, Series B, 202: 117-158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B.C., A.D. Campbell, R.A. Radcliffe & V.G. Erwin, 1991. Cocaine actions, brain levels and receptors in selected lines of mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 40: 941-948.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, A.E., 1993. Locomotor activity and exploration, pp. 1-21 in Behavioural Neuroscience: A Practical Approach, Volume II, edited by A. Sahgal. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, A.E., M. Cador & L. Stinus, 1989. Exploration and its measurement: A psychopharmacological perspective, pp. 95- 144 in Neuromethods 13: Psychopharmacology, edited by A.A. Boulton, G.B. Baker and A.J. Greenshaw. Humana Press, Clifton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J., F. Figueroa & C.S. Davide, 1983. H-2 haplotypes, genes and antigens: Second listing: II. The H-2 complex. Immunogenetics 17: 553-596.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le Pape, G. & J.M. Lassalle, 1984. A developmental genetic analysis of locomotor activity in mice: Maternal effects in the BALB/c and C57BL/6 strains and heredity in F1 hybrids. Behav. Genet. 14: 21-29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lipp, H.-P., H. Schwegler, W.E. Crusio, D.P. Wolfer, M.-C. Leisinger-Trigona, B. Heimrich & P. Driscoll, 1989. Using genetically-defined rodent strains for the identification of hippocampal traits relevant for two-way avoidance behavior: A non-invasive approach. Experientia 45: 845-859.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R.G., 1987. The use of a plus-maze to measure anxiety in the mouse. Psychopharmacology 92: 180-185.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, M.F. & A.G. Searle (editors), 1989. Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, C.J., E.K. Wakeland & W.K. Potts, 1992. Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Nature 360: 581-583.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maxson, S.C., 1992. MHC genes, chemosignals, and genetic analyses of murine social behaviors, pp. 197-204 in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates VI, edited by R.L. Doty and D. Muller-Schwarze. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, T.E. & G.R. Tucker, 1964. Genotype and sex drive in intact and in castrated male mice. Science 145: 514-515.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, A. & P. Bowman, 1973. Genetic effects on the timing of early development in the mouse. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 30: 491-498.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michalek, H. & A. Pintor, 1990. Exposure to neurotoxins throughout the life span: Animal models for linking neurochemical effects to behavioral consequences, pp. 101-123 in Behavioral Measures of Neurotoxicity, edited by R.W. Russell, P.E. Flattau and A.M. Pope. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misslin, R. & P. Ropartz, 1981. Responses in mice to a novel object. Behaviour 78: 169-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikulina, E.M., J.A. Skrinskaya & N.K. Popova 1991. Role of g]enotype and dopamine receptors in behaviour of inbred mice in a forced swimming test. Psychopharmacology 105: 525- 529.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliverio, A., M.F. Elias, B.E. Eleftheriou & C. Castellano, 1975. Maze learning: A genetic investigation in the mouse. Psychol. Reports 36: 703-712.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paylor, R., R. Tracy, J. Wehner & J.W. Rudy, 1994. DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice differ in contextual fear but not auditory fear conditioning. Behav. Neurosci. 108: 810-817.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peeler, D.F. & R.S. Nowakowski, 1987. Genetic factors and the measurement of exploratory activity. Behav. Neural Biol. 48: 90-103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Popova, N.K. & A.V. Kulikov, 1986. Genetic analysis of ‘spontaneous’ intermale aggression in mice. Aggressive Behavior 12: 425-431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, W.K., C.J. Manning & E.K. Wakeland, 1991. Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature 352: 619-621.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, R.J. & J.C. Cole, 1994. The elevated plus maze: Pharmacology, methodology and ethology, pp. 9-44 in Ethology and Psychopharmacology, edited by S.J. Cooper and C.A. Hendrie. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubertoux, P., C. Semal & S. Ragueneau, 1985. Early development in mice: II. Sensory motor behavior and genetic analysis. Physiol. Behav. 35: 659-666.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roubertoux, P., M. Nosten-Bertrand, C. Cohen-Salmon & L. l’Hotellier, 1992. Behavioral development: A tool for genetic analysis in mice, pp. 423-441 in Techniques for the Genetic Analysis of Brain and Behavior: Focus on the Mouse, edited by D. Goldowitz, D. Wahlsten, and R.E. Wimer. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadile, A.G., 1993. What can genetic models tell us about behavioral plasticity? Reviews in the Neurosciences 4: 287-303.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schellinck, H.M. & R.E. Brown, 1992. Why does germfree rearing eliminate the odors of individuality in rats but not in mice? pp. 175-182 in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates VI, edited by R.L. Doty and D. Muller-Schwarze. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellinck, H.M. & R.E. Brown, 1995. Methodological questions in the study of the rat's ability to discriminate between the odours of individual conspecifics, pp. 427-436 in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 7, edited by R. Apfelbach, D. Muller-Schwarze, D.K. Reutter, and E. Weiler. Pergamon, Oxford.

  • Shanks, N. & H. Anisman, 1988. Stressor-provoked behavioral changes in six strains of mice. Behav. Neurosci. 102: 894-905.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, N. & H. Anisman, 1989. Strain-specific effects of antidepressants on escape deficits induced by inescapable shock. Psychopharmacology 99: 122-128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, N., J. Griffiths, S. Zalcman, R.M. Zacharko & H. Anisman, 1990. Mouse strain differences in plasma corticosterone following uncontrollable footshock. Pharmacol., Biochem. & Behav. 36: 515-519.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, N., S. Zalcman, R.M. Zacharko & H. Anisman, 1991. Alterations of central norepinephrine, dopamine and serotonin in several strains of mice following acute stressor exposure. Pharmacol., Biochem. Behav. 38: 69-75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A.G., H. Tsuchiya, J.L. Wellington, G.K. Beauchamp & K. Yamazaki, 1993. Chemistry of odor types in mice: Fractionation and bioassay. J. Chem. Ecol. 19: 569-579.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P.B., R.E. Brown & B. Roser, 1987. MHC antigens in urine as olfactory recognition cues. Nature 327: 161-164.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smotherman, W.P. & S.R. Robinson, 1996. The development of behavior before birth. Dev. Psychol. 32: 425-434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streng, J., 1974. Exploration and learning behavior in mice selectively bred for high and low levels of activity. Behav. Genet. 4: 191-204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trullas, R. & P. Skolnick, 1993. Differences in fear motivated behaviors among inbred mouse strains. Psychopharmacology 111: 323-331.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Upchurch, M. & J.M. Wehner, 1988. Differences between inbred strains of mice in Morris water maze performance. Behav. Genet. 18: 55-68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Upchurch, M. & J.M. Wehner, 1989. Inheritance of spatial learning ability in inbred mice: A classical genetic analysis. Behav. Neurosci. 103: 1251-1258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlsten, D., 1975. Genetic variation in the development of mouse brain and behavior: Evidence from the middle postnatal period. Dev. Psychobiol. 8: 371-380.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R.N. & R.A. Cummins, 1976. The open field test: A critical review. Psychol. Bull. 83: 482-504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, C.M., M.S. Brownell & M.F. Rothschild, 1991. Analysis of litter size and weight in mice differing in Ped gene phenotype and the Q region of the H-2 complex. J. Reprod. Immunol. 19: 303-313.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, S.B., G.F. Koob & J.L. Martinez, Jr., 1992. Differences in one-way active avoidance learning in mice of three inbred strains. Behav. Genet. 22: 177-188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, M., K. Yamazaki, G. K. Beauchamp, J. Bard, L. Thomas & E.A. Boyse, 1981. Distinctive urinary odors governed by the major histocompatibility locus of the mouse. Immunology 78: 5817-5820.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki, K., E.A. Boyse, V. Mike, H.T. Thaler, B.J. Mathieson, J. Abbott, E. Boyse, Z.A. Zoyas & L. Thomas, 1976. Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. J. Exp. Med. 144: 1324-1335.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 4J1

    Richard E. Brown, Heather M. Schellinck & Justin Jagosh

Authors
  1. Richard E. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heather M. Schellinck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Justin Jagosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, R.E., Schellinck, H.M. & Jagosh, J. Behavioural studies of MHC‐congenic mice. Genetica 104, 249–257 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026438010723

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026438010723

Search

Navigation