Skip to main content
Log in

Strain-specific effects of antidepressants on escape deficits induced by inescapable shock

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of several antidepressants (desmethylimipramine, amitriptyline and bupropion) on escape deficits induced by inescapable shock were assessed in four strains of mice. The extent of the escape interference engendered by inescapable shock varied across strains of mice. These deficits of escape performance were differentially affected by the drug treatments across strains. Repeated administration of desmethylimipramine eliminated the escape interference in A/J, but did not affect the performance in Balb/cByJ, C57BL/6J or CD-1 mice. Bupropion, in contrast, had a modest effect only in CD-1 mice. Unlike these compounds, the 5-HT reuptake blocker, amitriptyline, was found to influence escape performance irrespective of whether the drug was acutely or chronically applied. It is suggested that (a) the relative contributions of various mechanisms subserving the escape interference may vary across strains of mice, hence accounting for the strain-specific effects of the drug treatments, and (b) various antide-pressants influence performance by affecting different components of the behavioral output, some of which may be apparent after acute treatment while others are expressed only after repeated treatment with the compound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anisman H (1984) Vulnerability to depression: contribution of stress. In: Post RM, Ballenger JC (eds) Frontiers of clinical neuroscience: neurobiology of mood disorders, vol. 1, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, pp 407–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Anisman H, deCantazaro D, Remington G (1978) Escape performance following exposure to inescapable shock: deficits in motor response maintenance. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 4:197–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Anisman H, Remington G, Sklar LS (1979) Effect of inescapable shock on subsequent escape performance: catecholaminiergic and cholinergic mediation of response initiation and maintenance. Psychopharmacology 61:107–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Anisman H, Pizzino A, Sklar LS (1980) Coping with stress: norepinephrine depletion and escape performance. Brain Res 191:583–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Anisman H, Kokkinidis L, Sklar LS (1985) Neurochemical consequences of stress: Contributions of adaptive processes. In: Burchfield S (ed) Psychological and physiological interactions in response to stress. Hemisphere, New York, pp 67–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc G, Herve D, Simon H, Lisoprawski A, Glowinski J, Tassin JP (1980) Response to stress of mesocortico-frontal dopaminergic neurones in rats after long-term isolation. Nature 294:265–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Depue RA, Monroe SM (1986) Conceptualization and measurement of human disorder in life stress research: the problem of chronic disturbance. Psychol Bull 99:36–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Drugan RC, Ryan SM, Minor TR, Maier SF (1984) Librium prevents the analgesia and shuttlebox escape deficit typically observed following inescapable shock. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 21:749–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1981) Increased intracranial self-stimulation in rats after long-term administration of desipramine. Science 214:683–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms HH (1983) The antidepressant agents desipramine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and norzimelidine inhibit uptake of [3H] noradrenaline and [3H] 5-hydroxtryptamine in slices of human and rat cortical brain tissue. Brain Res 275:99–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Heninger GR, Charney DS (1987) Mechanism of action of antide-pressant treatments: Implications for the etiolotgy and treatment for depressive disorders, In: Meltzer HY (ed) Psychopharmacology: the third generation of progress. Raven Press, New York, pp 535–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Herve D, Tassin JP, Barthelemy C, Blanc G, Lavielle S, Glowinski J (1979) Difference in the reactivity of the mesocortical dopaminergic neurons to stress in the Balb/c and C57/BL mice. Life Sci 25:1659–1664

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson DC (1987) Role of dopamine mechanisms in affective disorders. In: Meltzer HY (ed) Psychopharmacology: the third generation of progress. Raven Press, New York, pp 505–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz MM, Hirschfeld RMA (1978) Phenomenology and classification of depression. In: Lipton MA, DiMascio A, Killam KF (eds) Psychopharmacology: a generation of progress. Raven Press, New York, pp 1185–1195

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitre L, Baumann PA, Jaekel J, Waldmeier PC (1982) 5-HT uptake inhibitors: psychopharmacological and neurochemical criteria of selectivity. In: Ho BT, Schoolar JC, Usdin E (eds) Serotonin in biological psychiatry. Raven Press, New York, pp 229–246

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeal ET, Cimbolic P (1986) Antidepressants and biochemical theories of depression. Psychol Bull 99:361–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer HY (1987) Psychopharmacology: the third generation of progress. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer HY, Lowy MT (1987) The serotonin hypothesis of depression. In: Meltzer HY (ed) Psychopharmacology: the third generation of progress. Raven Press, New York, pp 513–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll KM, Davis JM, DeLeon-Jones F (1985) Medication and somatic therapies in the treatment of depression. In: Beckham E, Leber WR (eds) Handbook of depression: treatment, assessment and research. Dorsey Press, Homewood, Illinois, pp 202–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty F, Sherman AD (1982) A neurochemical differentiation between exposure to stress and the development of learned helplessness. Drug Dev Res 2:43–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks N, Anisman H (1988) Stressor provoked behavioral changes in six strains of mice. Behav Neurosci 102:894–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks N, Zalcman S, Prince CR, Anisman H (1988) Strain-specific catecholamine variations induced by stressors: relation to behavioral change. Soc Neurosci Abstr 14:969

    Google Scholar 

  • Siever LJ (1987) Role of noradrenergic mechanisms in the etiology of affective disorders. In: Meltzer HY (ed) Psychopharmacology: the third generation of progress. Raven Press, New York, pp 493–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern WC, Harto-Truax N, Rogers J, Miller L (1982) Clinical profile of the novel antidepressant bupropion. In: Costa E, Racagni G (eds) Typical and atypical antidepressants: clinical practice. Raven Press, New York, pp 21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Thase ME, Frank E, Kupfer DJ (1985) Biological processes in major depression. In: Beckham E, Leber WR (eds) Handbook of depression: treatment, assessment, and research. Dorsey, Homewood, Illinois, pp 816–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag HM (1978) Amine hypotheses of affective disorders. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol 13. Plenum Press, New York, pp 187–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag HM, Lemus C (1986) Monoamine precursors in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. In: Wurtman JJ, Wurtman RJ (eds) Nutrition and the brain. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag HM, Kahn RS, Asnis GM, Wetzler S, Brown SL, Bleich A, Korn ML (1987) Denosologization of biological psychiatry or the specificity of 5-HT disturbances in psychiatric disorders. J Affective Disord 13:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss JM, Goodman-Simson PA (1985) Neurochemical mechanisms underlying stress-induced depression. In: Field TM, McCabe P, Schneiderman N (eds) Stress and coping vol. 1. Lawrence-Erlbaum, New York, pp 93–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss JM, Glazer HI, Pohorecky LA (1976) Coping behavior and neurochemical changes: an alternative explanation for the original “Learned Helplessness” experiments. In: Serban G, Kling A (eds) Animal models in human psychobiology. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimer RE, Norman R, Eleftheriou BE (1973) Serotonin levels in hippocampus: striking variations associated with mouse strain and treatment. Brain Res 63:397–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharko RM, Anisman H (1988) Pharmacological, biochemical and behavioral analysis of depression: animal models. In: Koob GF, Ellers S, Bloom FE (eds) Animal models of depression. Anhauser, Boston (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharko RM, Bowers WJ, Prince CR, Anisman H (1983) Behavioral alterations following repeated exposure to uncontrollable footshock or desmethylimipramine. Soc Neurosci Abstr 9:561

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharko RM, Bowers WJ, Anisman H (1984a) Responding for brain stimulation: stress and desmethylimipramine. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 8:601–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharko RM, Bowers WJ, Kelley MS, Anisman H (1984b) Prevention of stressor-induced disturbances of self-stimulation by desmethylimipramine. Brain Res 321:175–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharko RM, Lalonde GT, Kasian M, Anisman H (1987) Strain-specific effects of inescapable shock on intracranial self-stimulation from the nucleus accumbens. Brain Res 426:164–168

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shanks, N., Anisman, H. Strain-specific effects of antidepressants on escape deficits induced by inescapable shock. Psychopharmacology 99, 122–128 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634465

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634465

Key words

Navigation