Abstract
This paper is a report on aconversation held between the authors andcentered on their shared interest inalternative methods of inquiry and evaluationin agriculture. The conversation was initiatedat the W. K. Kellogg Foundation and has evolvedthrough a series of long distanceconversations. Though not a verbatim transcriptof our conversations, this paper represents acomposite of both the face-to-face conversationand our stream of dialogue over the past year.Central to our discussion is an exploration ofthe parallels between the paradigm shift thatoccurred in evaluation in the early 1980s andthe current agricultural paradigm shift beingpromoted by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation. Inthe course of this conversational paper, wesuggest not only that evaluators andresearchers should cultivate their capacity tohear and tell stories, but also thatagricultural programs and their long-termimpacts could benefit from different kinds ofevaluation efforts. From this perspective, theevaluation or research report is no longer anattempt to mirror reality, but rather it is anevocative story that asks the reader to engagethe storyline morally, emotionally,aesthetically, and intellectually, as well asfrom a social impact perspective. It is ourhope that this paper will serve as what Lather(1993) has called an ``incitement to discourse''in the disciplinary fields of agriculture andevaluation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berry, W. (2000).“ A conversation with Wendell Berry.” Image 26: 45–56.
Brody, H. (1994). “'My story is broken; can you help me fix it?' Medical ethics and the joint construction of narrative.” Literature and Medicine 13(1): 79–92.
Bruner, J. (1991). “The narrative construction of reality.” Critical Inquiry 18: 1–21.
Crites, S. (1971).“The narrative quality of experience.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 39: 291–311.
Denzin, Norman K. (2002) “Performing evaluation.” In K. E. Ryan and T. A. Schwandt (eds.), Exploring Evaluator Role and Identity (pp. 139–165). Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.
Esteva, G. (1994). “Re-embedding food in agriculture.” Culture and Agriculture 48: 2–13.
Frank, A. (1995). The Wounded Storyteller. Chicago: Harvard University Press.
Greenwood, D. and M. Levin (2000). “Reconstructing the relationships between universities and society through action research.” In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
Guba, E. and Y. Lincoln (1981). Effective Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Guba, E. and Y. Lincoln. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
Harding, S (1987). Sex and Scientific Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Horton, Douglas (1998). “Disciplinary roots and branches of evaluation: Some lessons from agricultural research.” Knowledge and Policy 10(4): 31–188.
Lather, P. (1993). “Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism.” The Sociological Quarterly 34(4): 673–694.
Lather, P. (1986). “Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place.” Interchange 17(4): 63–84.
LeCompte, M. (1993). “A framework for hearing silence: What does telling stories mean when we are supposed to be doing science?” In McLaughlin and Tierney (eds.), Naming Silenced Lives. Personal Narratives and the Process of Educational Change (pp. 9–28). New York: Routledge.
Lincoln, Y. and E. Guba (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
Mackay, R. and D. Horton (2002). Expanding the Use of Impact Assessment and Evaluation in Agricultural Research and Development. Paper presented at the International Conference on Impacts of Agricultural Research and Development, San Jose, Costa Rice, February 4-7.
Stake, R. (1978). “The case study method in social inquiry.” Educational Researcher 7(2): 5–8.
Whyte, H. (1981). “The value of narrativity in the representation of reality.” In W. J. T. Mitchell (ed.), On Narrative (pp. 1–23). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lincoln, Y.S., Thorp, L.G. & Russon, C. The storied nature of agriculture and evaluation: A conversation. Agriculture and Human Values 20, 267–276 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026197908214
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026197908214