Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

methods during the silvopastoral-system establishment in midwestern USA: Cattle performance and tree damage

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Silvopastoral systems offer an alternative to the conventional cow-calf segment of the beef industry in the Midwestern region of the United States. Little information exists for transitioning from a conventional pasture-based beef operation to a silvopastoral system utilizing multiple deciduous tree species. Nine pastures approximately 1 ha in size were established with a mixture of cool-season grasses and legumes to investigate tree protection methods and cattle performance. Four tree species (Juglans nigra, Gleditsia triacanthos, Quercus rubra, & Carya illinoensis) were planted within six of these pastures. Three methods of protection were tested, and included a no protection control (Con), foliar application of 0.20% denatonium benzoate (TreeGuard™), or a single strand of electrified poly-wire (EF) in each of the two grazing years. Cattle damage to young trees was prominent during the two years for Con and TreeGuard™. EF offered acceptable protection. Red oak trees suffered the highest degree of damage from livestock. Establishing trees within grazed pastures did not hinder performance of beef cattle. Transitioning from conventional pastures to silvopastures can be accelerated utilizing an electrified fencing system to prevent cattle damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benfeldt E.S., Feldhake C.M. and Burger J.A. 2001. Establishing trees in Appalachian silvopasture: response to shelters, grass control, mulch, and fertilization. Agrofor. Syst. 53: 291-295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clason T.R. 1995. Economic implications of silvipastures on southern pine plantations. Agrofor. Syst. 29: 227-238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eason W.R., Gill E.K. and Roberts J.E. 1996. Evaluation of anti-sheep tree-stem-protection products in silvopastoral argroforestry. Agrofor. Syst. 34: 259-264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines P.J., Bell A.B. and Thatcher L.P. 1994. Evaluation of some factors involved in reducing browsing damage to eucalypt trees by sheep. Australian J. Expt. Agri.

  • Kingery J.L. and Graham R.T. 1991. The effect of cattle grazing on Ponderosa pine regeneration. J. For. 67: 245-248

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmkuhler J.W., Kerley M.S., Garrett H.E., Cutter B.E. and McGraw R.L. 1998-1999. Comparison of continuous and rotational silvopastoral systems for established walnut plantations in southwest. Missouri, USA. Agrofor. Syst. 44: 267-279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemieux N.C., Maynard B.K. and Johnson W.A. 2000. Evaluation of commercial deer repellents on ornamentals in nurseries. J. Environ. Hort. 18: 5-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R.L. and Wright J.C. 1991. Experiences in pecan orchard floor vegetation management: Two years of stocker steer performances and evaluation of grazing management. Annu.-Rep.-North-Nut.-Grow.-Assoc. 82: 72-79

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte D.L. 1998. Efficacy of selected repellents to deter deer browsing on conifer seedlings. Inter. Biodeter. Biodegrad. 42: 101-107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NRC 1996. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle (7th Ed.). National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson H.A., Baldwin V.C. and Barnett J.P. 1990a. Cattle grazing and pine survival and growth in subterranean clover pasture. Agrofor. Syst. 10: 161-168

  • Pearson H.A., Prince T.E. and Todd Jr. C.M. 1990b. Virginia pines and cattle grazing-an agroforestry opportunity. South J. Appl. For. 14: 55-59

  • Pearson H.A. and Whitaker L.B. 1974. Forage and cattle responses to different grazing intensities on southern pine ridge. J. Range Manage 27: 444-446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow S.H. 2001. Effects of shelter tubes on hardwood tree establishment in western Oregon silvopastures. Agrofor. Syst. 53: 283-290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow S.H., Carlson D.H., Emmingham W.H. and Lavender D. 1996. Productivity of two Douglas fir/subclover/sheep agroforests compared to pasture and forest monocultures. Agrofor. Syst. 34: 305-313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stace C. 1993. Stock protectors for tree seedlings: a review of Conservation Plants research. New Zealand Tree Grower. 14: 16-19

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright I.A. and Milne J.A. 1996. Aversion of Red deer and Roe deer to denatonium benzoate in the diet. Forest. 69: 1-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706

    J.W. Lehmkuhler

  2. College of Agriculture, Forestry, and Consumer Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506

    E.E.D. Felton

  3. Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, IL, 60614

    D.A. Schmidt

  4. 111 Animal Sciences Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211

    K.J. Bader, H.E. Garrett & M.S. Kerley

Authors
  1. J.W. Lehmkuhler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E.E.D. Felton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D.A. Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K.J. Bader
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H.E. Garrett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M.S. Kerley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.S. Kerley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehmkuhler, J., Felton, E., Schmidt, D. et al. methods during the silvopastoral-system establishment in midwestern USA: Cattle performance and tree damage. Agroforestry Systems 59, 35–42 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026184902984

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026184902984

Search

Navigation