Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Forage productivity and profitability in newly-established open pasture, silvopasture, and thinned forest production systems

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is growing interest among farmers in the northeast US in silvopasture and other practices that would help them expand their agricultural land base in this forested region. Unfortunately, little quantitative data exist regarding forage performance and economic outcomes associated with different forest-to-agriculture conversion strategies, particularly for the northern tier of states. This research examined forage dry matter production and quality in six forage treatments (orchardgrass, bluegrass, brome, and perennial ryegrass bicultures with white clover; cut hay; and a control) in newly-established silvopastures and open pastures converted from an early successional northern hardwood forest in New York. In addition, we conducted a financial analysis of the establishment of both agricultural systems, as well as a thinned forest treatment managed solely for wood products. Total forage dry matter production (planted forages plus volunteer grasses) was greater in open pastures than silvopastures in the first year after establishment; however, no differences in total forage production were found between silvopastures and open pastures in June or August of the second year. Total forage dry matter production was greater in the orchardgrass-white clover biculture compared to the control treatment in both years. Orchardgrass percent crude protein was lower in open pastures (10.7%) compared to silvopastures (12.9%) in June of year two. The financial analysis indicated that silvopasture outperformed open pasture and thinned forest treatments in terms of both IRR and NPV. We conclude that forage production in silvopastures can be competitive with that in open pastures on sites with a similar, forested, starting condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ares A, Reid W, Brauer D (2006) Production and economics of native pecan silvopastures in central United States. Agrofor Syst 66:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasko JA, Nelson CJ (2003) Grasses for northern areas. In: Barnes RF, Nelson CJ, Collins M, Moore KJ (eds) Forages an introduction to grassland agriculture. Blackwell Publishing, Iowa, pp 125–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Belesky DP, Chatterton NJ, Neel JPS (2006) Dactylis glomerata growing along a light gradient in the central appalachian region of the eastern USA: III. Nonstructural carbohydrates and nutritive value. Agrofor Syst 67:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowell B, Coffin C, Courchesne C, Frignoca I, Greene M, Iarrapino A, Rushlow J, Ruhf K (2014) New England food policy: building a sustainable food system. American Farmland Trust, Conservation Law Foundation, Northeast Sustainable Agriculture Working Group, p 175

  • Broughton B, Bukenya JO, Nyakatawa E (2012) Economic feasibility of simultaneous production of pine sawlogs and meat goats on small-sized farms in Alabama. J Life Sci 6:80–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Buergler AL, Fike JH, Burger JA, Feldhake CR, McKenna JA, Teutsch CD (2005) Botanical composition and forage production in an emulated silvopasture. Agron J 97:1141–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buergler AL, Fike JH, Burger JA, Feldhake CM, McKenna JR, Teutsch CD (2006) Forage nutritive value in an emulated silvopasture. Agron J 98:1265–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burner DM (2003) Influence of alley crop environment on orchardgrass and tall fescue herbage. Agron J 95:1163–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll JE (2008) Pastures of plenty. New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station, New Hampshire, p 142

    Google Scholar 

  • Casler MD, Kallenbach RL (2007) Cool-season grasses for humid areas. In: Barnes RF, Nelson CJ, Moore KJ, Collins M (eds) Forages the science of grassland agriculture. Blackswell Publishing, Iowa, pp 211–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Chedzoy BJ, Smallidge PJ (2011a) Silvopasturing in the Northeast an introduction to opportunities and strategies for integrating livestock in private woodlands. Cornell Cooperative Extension, New York, p 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Chedzoy BJ, Smallidge PJ (2011b) Silvopasture. Cornell cooperative extension. http://silvopasture.ning.com/. Accessed 2016

  • DeBruyne SA, Feldhake CM, Burger JA, Fike JH (2011) Tree effects on forage growth and soil water in an Appalachian silvopasture. Agrofor Syst 83:189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devkota NR, Wall AJ, Kemp PD, Hodgson J (2001) Relationship between canopy closure and pasture production in deciduous tree based temperate silvopastoral systems. In: Gomide JA, Mattos WRS, Da Silva SC (eds) International grasslands congress, 19th. Sao Paulo

  • Feldhake CM, Belesky DP (2009) Photosynthetically active radiation use efficiency of Dactylis glomerata and Schedonorus phoenix along a hardwood tree-induced light gradient. Agrofor Syst 75:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldhake CM, Neel JPS, Belesky DP (2010) Establishment and production from thinned mature deciduous-forest silvopastures in Appalachia. Agrofor Syst 79:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrez J, Davison AC, Rebetez M (2011) Extreme temperature analysis under forest cover compared to an open field. Agr Forest Meteorol 151:992–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett HE, Kerley MS, Ladyman KP, Walter WD, Godsey LD, Van Sambeek JW, Brauer DK (2004) Hardwood silvopasture management in North America. Agrofor Syst 61:21–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Godsey LD, Walter WD, Dwyer JP, Garrett HE (2007) A preliminary economic analysis of silvopasture in Missouri’s Ozark forests. In: Buckley DS, Clatterbuck WK (eds) 15th central hardwood forest conference, 2007. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, pp 418–424

  • Kallenbach R, Gold M, Hall M (2009) Integrating silvopastures into current forage-livestock systems. In: Agroforestry comes of age: putting science into practice. Proceedings of the 11th North American agroforestry conference, 2009. The University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry, Columbia, Missouri, pp 455–461

  • Lin C, McGraw R, George M, Garrett H (1999) Shade effects on forage crops with potential in temperate agroforestry practices. Agrofor Syst 44:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CH, McGraw ML, George MF, Garrett HE (2001) Nutritive quality and morphological development under partial shade of some forage species with agroforestry potential. Agrofor Syst 53:269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel AH, Roark CB (1956) Performance and grazing habits of hereford and aberdeen-angus cows and calves on improved pastures as related to types of shade. J Anim Sci 15:59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neel JPS, Feldhake CM, Belesky DP (2008) Influence of solar radiation on the productivity and nutritive value of herbage of cool-season species of an understorey sward in a mature conifer woodland. Grass Forage Sci 63:38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (2015) Monthy climatological summary. National Oceanic and Atmoshpheric Administration, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service

  • NY DEC (2014) Stumpage price report, summer 2014. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

  • R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 3.1.2 edn. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  • Ryle GJA (1967) Effects of shading on inflorescence size and development in temperate perennial grasses. Ann Appl Biol 59:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow SH (1999) Silvopastoralism: competition and facilitation between trees, livestock, and improved grass clover pastures on temperate rainfed lands. In: Buck L, Lassoie J, Fernández E (eds) Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems. CRC Press LLC, New York, pp 111–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleugh B, Moore KJ, George JR, Brummer EC (2000) Binary legume–grass mixtures improve forage yield, quality, and seasonal distribution. Agron J 92:24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twery MJ et al (2005) NED-2: a decision support system for integrated forest ecosystem management. Comput Electron Agr 49:24–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2013) Agroforestry: USDA reports to America, fiscal years 2011-2012-in-brief. United States Department of Agriculture, pp 18

  • Varella AC, Peri PL, Lucus RJ, Moot DJ, McNeil DL (2001) Dry matter production and nutritive value of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) under different light regimes. In: Gomide JA, Mattos WRS, Da Silva SC (eds) International grasslands congress, 19th. Sao Paulo

  • Walter WD, Dey DC, Dwyer JP (2007) Epicormic response when converting hardwood forests into silvopasture. In: Buckley DS, Clatterbuck WK (eds) 15th Central Hardwood Forest Conference, 2007. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, pp 425–432

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Drew Conroy, Lesley Atwood, Jennifer Wilhelm, and Nicholas Warren at the University of New Hampshire for their critical reviews in the development of this project. We would also like to thank Leanne Ketner for her hard work sampling forages while feeding blackflies. Additional thanks goes to David Patrick for his guidance in statistical analyses, and Dan Kelting for the use of Adirondack Watershed Institute facilities. This project was supported by a Northeast Sustainable Research and Education Farmer Grant with funding made available by the United States Department of Agriculture. Funding was provided by Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service (Grant No. FNE12-762 SARE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Paul Smith’s College, Routes 86 & 30, Post Office Box 265, Paul Smiths, NY, 12970, USA

    Joseph Orefice

  2. Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, 105 Main St, Durham, NH, 03824, USA

    Richard G. Smith, John Carroll, Heidi Asbjornsen & Theodore Howard

Authors
  1. Joseph Orefice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard G. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John Carroll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Heidi Asbjornsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Theodore Howard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Orefice.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orefice, J., Smith, R.G., Carroll, J. et al. Forage productivity and profitability in newly-established open pasture, silvopasture, and thinned forest production systems. Agroforest Syst 93, 51–65 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0052-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0052-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation