Skip to main content
Log in

Preoperative Antimicrobial Administration for Prevention of Postoperative Infection in Patients with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was designed to investigate whether the administration of antimicrobial agents before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is more effective for prevention of postoperative infection. During the period from January 1991 to September 2001, 397 patients treated with sulbactam/cefoperazone (SBT/CPZ) for prevention of postoperative infection were studied: 200 patients received SBT/CPZ 1 hr before LC, and 197 patients were not given the preoperative treatment. The positive rate of bacteria in the gallbladder bile in the group receiving preoperative SBT/CPZ was 12.0%, a significant suppression compared with 19.8% in the group without preoperative treatment (P < 0.05). Identification of microorganisms in the bile revealed E. coli and Klebsiella in the preoperative treatment group, which showed a significant suppression (P < 0.05). The mean white blood cell count was significantly lower in the preoperative treatment group (9860/μl) than in the nonpreoperative treatment group (10,520/μl) (P < 0.05). The above results demonstrate that administration of SBT/CPZ before LC suppressed the level of bacteria in the bile, resulting in a significant reduction in complications induced by postoperative infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sanchez-Ubeda R, Fernand E, Rousselot LM: Complication rate in general surgical cases: the value of penicillin and streptomycin as postoperative prophylaxis—a study of 511 cases. N Engl J Med 259:1045-1050, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  2. Page CP, Bohnen JM, Fletcher JR, McManus AT, Solomkin JS, Wittmann DH: Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical wounds. Guidelines for clinical care. Arch Surg 128:78-88, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart L, Ponce R, Oesterle AL, Griffiss JM, Way LW: Pigment gallstone pathogenesis: slime production by biliary bacteria is more important than beta-glucuronidase production. J Gastrointest Surg 4:547-553, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sandstad O, Osnes T, Skar, V, Urdal P, Osnes M: Structure and composition of common bile duct stones in relation to duodenal diverticula, gastric resection, cholecystoctomy and infection. Digestion 61:181-188, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  5. Simmons BP: Guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections. Infect Control 3:185-196, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garner JS: Guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985. Infect Control 7:193-200, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR: Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:247-278, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  8. Classen DC, Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Horn SD, Menlove RL, Burke JP: The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med 326:281-286, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lippert H, Gastinger J: Antimicrobial prophylaxis in laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy. Conclusions of a large prospective multicenter quality assurance study in Germany. Chemotherapy 44:355-363, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  10. Orda R, Berger SA, Levy Y, Shnaker A, Gorea A: Penetration of ceftriaxone and cefoperazone into bile and gallbladder tissue in patients with acute cholecystitis. Dig Dis Sci 37:1691-1693, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  11. Farello GA, Cerofolini A: Antimicrobial prophylaxis with ceftriaxone in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a 7-year clinical experience involving 3,603 patients. J Chemother 12(suppl 3): 17-22, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  12. Winston DJ, Bartoni K, Bruckner DA, Schiller GJ, Territo MC: Randomized comparison of sulbactam/cefoperazone with imipenem as empirical monotherapy for febrile granulocytopenic patients. Clin Infect Dis 26:576-583, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leung JW, Chan RC, Cheung SW, Sung JY, Chung SC, French GL: The effect of obstruction on the biliary excretion of cefoperazone and ceftazidime. J Antimicrob Chemother 25:399-406, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li JT, Lu Y, Hou J, Chen YF, Miao JZ, Jia YX, Hou J, Zhang XZ, Chen DK, Hu WZ, Li LJ, Liu DM, Wang Z, Wu J, Gu JM, Wang HL, Zhang YL, Sun L: Sulbactam/cefoperazone versus cefotaxime for the treatment of moderate-to-severe bacterial infections: results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis 24:498-505, 1997

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroki Yamaue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uchiyama, K., Kawai, M., Onishi, H. et al. Preoperative Antimicrobial Administration for Prevention of Postoperative Infection in Patients with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 48, 1955–1959 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026114203622

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026114203622

Navigation