Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An experiment in digital government at the United States National Organic Program

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital communications technology isreconfiguring democratic governance. Federalagencies increasingly rely on Internet-basedapplications to improve citizen-governmentinteraction. Early efforts in the area ofdigital government have created newparticipatory opportunities as well asformidable governance challenges. Federalagencies are working within and across theirboundaries to find an e-rulemaking format thatis cost-effective, legally appropriate,user-friendly, and well suited to diverse modesof rulemaking activities. One of the overridingissues emerging from this process is thedefinition of meaningful public participationin rulemaking. An examination of an early caseinvolving the USDA's National Organic Programproposed rule summarizes comments related togenetic engineering, biosolids, irradiation,and the role of the National Organic StandardsBoard. The USDA's experience suggests a numberof complex challenges that must be met toeffectively integrate Web-based communicationsinto the federal rulemaking process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikens, G. S. (1999). “Deweyan systems in the information age.” In B. N. Hague and B. D. Loader (eds.), Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age (pp. 179–194). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. J. and L. A. Pal (1998). “Introduction: New currents in politics and policy.” In C. J. Alexander and L. A. Pal (eds.), Digital Democracy: Policy and Politics in the Wired World (pp. 2–22). Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, E. R. (1998). “Digital democracy or politics on a microchip.” In C. J. Alexander and L. A. Pal (eds.), Digital Democracy: Policy and Politics in the Wired World (pp. xii–xv). Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleifuss, J. (1998). “Organic with a corporate twist.” In These Times, February 22, 1998: 11. LEXIS®-NEXIS® Academic Universe. Retrieved from http://web.lexisnexis.com/universe/form/academic/s_guidednews.html on February 22, 2000.

  • Burros, M. (2000). “U.S. planning tough rules for growing organic food.” New York Times, March 5, 2000: 1, 22. LEXIS®-NEXIS® Academic Universe. Retrieved from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/form/academic/ s_guidednews.html on March 5, 2000.

  • Clinton, W. F. (1999). Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov on June 20, 2000.

  • Conover, K. A. (1998). “Public groundswell sways organic guidelines.” Christian Science Monitor, May 14, 1998: 14. LEXIS®-NEXIS® Academic Universe. Retrieved from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/form/academic/ s_guidednews.html on February 22, 2000.

  • Davis, R. (1999). The Web of Politics: The Internet's Impact on the American Political System. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGregori, T. R. (2000). Genetically Modified Nonsense. Monsanto Website, Retrieved from http://www.biotechknowledge.com/showlib_us.php3?2769 on February 22, 2000.

  • Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, N. G. and R. M. Lee (1998). Computer Analysis and Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fountain, J. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friel, B. (1998). Real World Results. Retrieved from GOVEXEC.COM, http://govexec.com/tech/techawrd/98 awards.htm on November 5, 1999.

  • Froggatt, A. and K. Rankine (1999). “Brave new world revisited.” The Ecologist 29(8) (December): 464–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. and S. F. Rae (1940). The Pulse of Democracy: The Public-Opinion Poll and How ItWorks. NewYork: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, D. (2000). National Organic Standards Remarks As Prepared for Delivery by Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman National Organic Standards Washington, DC -March 7, 2000. Retrieved from http://www.ams.usda.gov:80/ nop/glickman.htm on June 18, 2000.

  • Gore, A. (2000). Statement by the Vice President. Retrieved from http://www.pub.whitehouse.gov/uri-res/I2R?urn:pdi:// oma.eop.gov.us/2000/2/3/7.text.1 on February 6, 2000.

  • Grossman, L. K. (1995). The Electronic Republic: Reshaping Democracy in the Information Age. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, M. (1998). “Heard on the beat: Farming and food.” Los Angeles Times, April 17, 1998: D2. LEXIS®-NEXIS® Academic Universe. Retrieved from http://web.lexisnexis.com/universe/form/academic/s_guidednews.html on February 22, 2000.

  • Hague, B. N. and B. D. Loader (1999). “Digital democracy: An introduction.” In B. N. Hague and B. D. Loader (eds.), Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. NewYork: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, S. (1993). Numbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics. Chicago: University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hern, M. and S. Chauk (1997). “The internet, democracy and community: another.big.lie.” Journal of Family Life 3(4): 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernon, P. (1998). “Government on the web: A comparison between the United States and New Zealand.” Government Information Quarterly 15(4): 419–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. A. and J. E. Hughes (1998). Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. M. (1998). “Who should decide what organic means?” The Detroit News, March 24, 1998: F1. LEXIS®-NEXIS® Academic Universe. Retrieved from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/form/academic/ s_guidednews.html on February 22, 2000.

  • Julian, S. (1998). “An organic roar over USDA labeling.” The Boston Globe, April 22, 1998: E1. LEXIS®-NEXIS® Academic Universe. Retrieved from http://web.lexisnexis.com/universe/form/academic/s_guidednews.html on February 22, 2000.

  • Kahn, R. E. (1995). “Evolution of the internet.” In Revolution in the U.S. Information Infrastructure (pp. 13–24). Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, L. (1999). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luoma, J. R. (2000). “Pandora's pantry.” Mother Jones (January/February): 53–59.

  • Malina, A. (1999). “Perspectives on citizen democratisation and alienation in the virtual public sphere.” In B. N. Hague and B. D. Loader (eds.), Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age (pp. 23–38). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margaronis, M. (1999). “The politics of food.” The Nation 269(22) (December 27): 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H. (1999). “Poor monsanto.” Whole Earth (Summer): 104–108.

  • New York Times (Editorial) (2000). “New rules on organic foods.” New York Times, March 9, 2000: A28.

  • New York Times (Editorial) (1998). “Revisiting the rules on organic food.” New York Times, April 13, 1998: A26. LEXIS®-NEXIS® Academic Universe. Retrieved from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/form/academic/ s_guidednews.html on February 22, 2000.

  • New York Times (Editorial) (1997). “Reading the organic rules.” New York Times, December 16, 1997: A30. LEXIS®-NEXIS® Academic Universe. Retrieved from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/form/academic/ s_guidednews.html on February 22, 2000.

  • Noack, D. R. (1995). “Of, by, and for the people.” Internet World 6(8): 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOSB (1996). National Organic Standards Board Biotechnology Policy. Retrieved from http://www.ams.usda.gov:80/ nop/nop2000/nosb%20recommedations/biotecpolicy.htm on March 5, 2000.

  • O'Brien, M. (2000). Making Better Environmental Decisions: An Alternative to Risk Assessment. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, M. R. (1998). “Technologies of abstraction: Cyberdemocracy and the changing communications landscape.” In C. J. Alexander and L. A. Pal (eds.), Digital Democracy: Policy and Politics in theWired World (pp. 63–86). Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organic Foods Production Act (1990). Retrieved from http://www.ams.usda.gov:80/nop/orgact.htm on November 10, 1999.

  • Perritt Jr., H. H. (1997). “Open government.” Government Information Quarterly 14: 397–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J. D. (1995). “Historical tensions in the concept of public opinion.” In Glasser and Salmon (eds.), Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontacq, J. M. (1998). “Give organic farming a boost.” San Francisco Chronicle, March 4, 1998: A19. LEXIS®-NEXIS® Academic Universe. Retrieved from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/form/academic/s_guidednews.html on February 22, 2000.

  • President's Information Technology Advisory Committee (1999). Information Technology Research: Investing in Our Future. Retrieved from http://www.ccic.gov/ac/report/ on January 14, 2000.

  • QSR (2000). QSR NUD*IST 4 OVERVIEW. Retrieved from http://www.qsr.com.au/software/n4/n4.htm on March 7, 2000.

  • Raffensperger, C. (1998). Wingspread Conference on the Precautionary Principle. Retrieved from http://www.sehn.org/wing.html on July 18, 2002.

  • Schiraga, L. (1998). “Ventura county perspective: USDA proposal would weaken organic standards.” Los Angeles Times, March 15, 1998: B19. LEXIS®-NEXIS® Academic Universe. Retrieved from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/form/academic/s_guidednews.html on February 22, 2000.

  • Schlosberg, D. (1999). Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D. and J. S. Dryzek (2002). “Digital democracy: Authentic or virtual?” Organization and Environment 14: 332–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A. and N. Leone (1997). “A delicate balance: The privacy and access practices of federal government world wide web sites.” Government Information Insider 6(2-3): 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, S., S. Beisser, T. Larson, and M. Shelley (2002). “Digital citizenship: Lessons learned as service-learning meets the digital divide.” In Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Digital Government Research, May 20-22, 2002. Digital Government Research Center (http:// www.digitalgovernment.org/archive/library/pdf/shulman.pdf).

  • Shulman, S. W., D. Schlosberg, S. Zavestoski, and D. Courard-Hauri (2003a). “Electronic Rulemaking: New frontiers in public participation.” Social Science Computer Review 21: 162–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman S. W., S. Zavestoski, E. Hovy, J. Callan, and O. Morales (2003b). SGER: A Testbed for eRulemaking Data. Retrieved from http://www.drake.edu/artsci/faculty/ sshulman/Papers/SGER2003.pdf on March 15, 2003.

  • Temin, T. T. (1997). “Fed services coming to a store near you.” Government Computer News 16(17): 70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesh, S. N. (2000). Uncertain Hazards: Environmental Activists and Scientific Proof. Ithaca New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2000a). Glickman Announces New Proposal for National Organic Standards. Retrieved from http://www.usda.gov/news/releases/2000/03/0074 on March 7, 2000.

  • USDA (2000b). Supplementary Information. Retrieved from http://www.usda.gov/nop/rule2000/intro.htm on march 7, 2000.

  • UDSA (1998). USDA to Make Fundamental Changes in Revised Proposed Rule on Organic Standards. Retrieved from http://usda.gov/news/releases/1998/05/0205 on March 6, 2000.

  • Wilhelm, A. (2000). Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavestoski, S. and S. W. Shulman (2002). “The internet and environmental decision making: An introduction.” Organization and Environment 14: 323–327.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Science and Policy Program, Drake University, Des Moines, IA, 50311, USA

    Stuart W. Shulman

Authors
  1. Stuart W. Shulman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart W. Shulman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shulman, S.W. An experiment in digital government at the United States National Organic Program. Agriculture and Human Values 20, 253–265 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026104815057

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026104815057

Search

Navigation