Abstract
With semi in vivo pollen tube growth assays, stigmas are pollinated in vivo and, after a fixed time interval, the styles are isolated from the ovary and placed on culture medium in vitro. Semi in vitro pollination includes isolation of the stigma and style complex, followed by pollination and placing the stylar end on nutrient medium. After semi in vivo pollination more and longer pollen tubes protruded from the cut end of the styles into medium, in comparison to semi in vitro pollination. Medium with 3 g l−1 agar was better than that with 6 g l−1 agar for pollen tube growth after the tubes emerged from the cut style. Semi in vitro pollination of the reversed style indicated that pollen tube growth was not influenced by the direction of the style. Fructose and glucose inhibited pollen tube growth compared to sucrose. Swollen tips characterized tube growth inhibition. After semi in vivo pollination all generative nuclei had divided to give two sperm nuclei. The average distance between the last sperm nucleus and the pollen tube tip as well as the distance between the two sperm nuclei diminished in growing pollen tubes between 24 and 48 h after pollination. The arrangements between the vegetative and the generative nuclei did not differ in semi in vivo and in vitro cultured pollen tubes of Aechmea fasciata. This information is important to explain why fertilization rate is low after placental pollination in comparison to placental grafted style pollination of Aechmea fasciata. The data may also contribute to the improvement of in vitro fertilization methods in Bromeliaceae and other higher plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brewbaker JL (1967) The distribution and phylogenetic signifi-cance of binucleate and trinucleate pollen grains in the Angiospollen perms. Am. J. Bot. 54: 1069–1083
Cheung AY (2001) Imaging elongating pollen tubes by green fluorescent protein. Sex. Plant Reprod. 14: 9–14
Cheung AY &; Wu H-M (2001) Pollen tube guidance right on target. Science 293: 1441–1442
Cresti M, Ciampolini F &; Sarfatti G (1980) Ultrastructural insperm vestigations on Lycopersicon peruvianum pollen activation and pollen tube organization after self-and cross-pollination. Planta 150: 211–217
Geitman A &; Emons AMC (2000) The cytoskeleton in plant and fungal cell tip growth. J. Micros. 198: 218–245
Graaf de BHJ, Derksen JWM &; Mariani C (2001) Pollen and pistil in the progamic phase. Sex. Plant Reprod. 14: 41–55
Hepher A &; Boulter ME (1987) Pollen tube growth and fertiliza-tion efficiency in Salpiglossis sinuata: implications for the involvement of chemotropic factors. Ann. Bot. 60: 595–601
Higashiyama T, Kuroiwa H, Kawano S &; Kuroiwa T (1998) Guidance in vitro of the pollen tube to the naked embryo sac of Torenia fournieri. Plant Cell 10: 2019–2031
Jauh GY, Eckard KJ, Nothnagel EA &; Lord EM (1997) Adhesion of lily pollen tubes to an artificial matrix. Sex. Plant Reprod. 10: 173–180
Kandasamy MK &; Kristen U (1987) Pollen tube growth in the style of Nicotiana sylvestris is neither influenced by the ovary nor directed by a gradient. J. Plant Physiol. 131: 495–500
Linskens HF &; Kroh M (1970) Regulation of pollen tube growth. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 5: 89–113
Lush WM (1999) Whither chemotropism and pollen tube guidance. Trends Plant Sci. 4: 413–418
Mulcahy GB &; Mulcahy DL (1985) Ovarian influence on pollen tube growth, as indicated by the semivivo technique. Am. J. Bot. 72: 1078–1080
Mulcahy GB &; Mulcahy DL (1987) Induced pollen tube direc-tionality. Am. J. Bot. 74: 1458–1459
Mulcahy GB &; Mulcahy DL (1988) Induced polarity as an index of pollination-triggered stylar activation. In: Cresti M, Gori P &; Pacini E (eds) Sexual Reproduction in Higher Plants (pp. 327–332). Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Tanaka I (1997) Differentiation of generative and vegetative cells in angiosperm pollen. Sex. Plant Reprod. 10: 1–7
Read SM, Clarke AE &; Bacic A (1993) Requirements for division of the generative nucleus in cultured pollen tubes of Nicotiana.Protoplasma 174: 101–115
Van Tuyl JM &; De Jeu MJ (1997) Methods for overcoming interspecific crossing barriers. In: Shivanna KR &; Sawhney VK (eds) Pollen Biotechnology for Crop Production and Improvement (pp. 273–292). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Vervaeke I, Parton E, Maene L, Deroose R &; De Proft MP (2001) Prefertilization barriers between different Bromeliaceae. Euphytica 118: 91–97
Vervaeke I, Parton E, Deroose R &; De Proft MP (2002a) Controlling prefertilization barriers by in vitro pollination and fertilization of Bromeliaceae. Acta Hort. 572: 21–28
Vervaeke I, Parton E, Maene L, Deroose R &; De Proft MP (2002b) Pollen tube growth and fertilization after different in vitro pollination techniques of Aechmea fasciata. Euphytica 124: 75–83
Vervaeke I, Delen R, Wouters J, Deroose R &; De Proft MP (2004) Division of the generative nucleus in cultured pollen tubes of the Bromeliaceae. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 76: 17–28
Willemse MTM &; Keijzer CJ (1990) Tracing pollen nuclei in the ovary and ovule of Gasteria verrucosa (Mill) H. Duval after pollination with DAPI-stained pollen. Sex. Plant Reprod. 3: 219–224
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vervaeke, I., Delen, R., Wouters, J. et al. Semi in vivo pollen tube growth of Aechmea fasciata . Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 76, 67–73 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025836915087
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025836915087