Skip to main content
Log in

Defense Reactions and Coping Strategies in Normal Adolescents

  • Published:
Child Psychiatry and Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In exploring the relationship between defense reactions and coping strategies in a non-clinic sample of adolescents (N = 81), we assessed: defense structure by the Bond Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ); coping behaviors by the Coping Responses Inventory-Youth Form (CRI-Youth); and general adjustment by Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) ratings. Defense reactions and coping strategies were modestly associated and made independent contributions in predicting the GAF. Mature and immature defenses and avoidance coping comprised the optimal combination in predicting the GAF, accounting for 20% of GAF variance. It is therefore important to assess both unconscious and conscious processes when assessing general functioning in normal adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lazarus r, Folkman, S: Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feldman S, Araujo K, Steiner H: Defense mechanisms in adolescents as a function of age, sex, and mental health status. In print.

  3. Vaillant G: Adaptation to life. Canada: Little, Brown & Co., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steiner, H: Defense styles in eating disorders. Int J Eating Disord 9: 141–151, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bond M, Gardner S, Christian J, Sigal C: Empirical study of self-related defense styles. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:333–338, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andrews G, Pollock C, Stewart G: The determination of defense style by questionnaire. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46:455–460, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vaillant G: Theoretical hierarchy of adaptive ego mechanisms: a 30 year follow-up of men selected for psychological health. Arch Gen Psychiatry 24:107–117, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moos R: Coping Response Inventory-Adult Form professional manual. Odessa FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Steiner H, Feldman S: Two approaches to the measurement of adaptive style: a comparison of normal, psychosomatically ill, and delinquent adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 34: 180–190, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moos R: Coping Response Inventory-Youth Form professional manual. Odessa FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, third edition, revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Endicott J, Spitzer R, Fleiss J, Cohen J: The global assessment scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 33, 766–771, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feldman S, Elliott G: At the threshold:The developing adolescent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erickson, S., Feldman, S.S. & Steiner, H. Defense Reactions and Coping Strategies in Normal Adolescents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 28, 45–56 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025145119301

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025145119301

Navigation