Skip to main content
Log in

Central Banker Contracts, Incomplete Information, and Monetary Policy Surprises: In Search of a Selfish Central Banker?

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Approaching monetary policy as a principal-agent problemprovides a useful framework for interpreting alternativedelegation schemes. In this paper, we consider theeffectiveness of central banker incentive schemes when theprincipal delegates monetary policy through contracts butremains uncertain about the central banker's responsiveness tosuch schemes. We adopt a simple principal-agent model andassume that the central banker's trade-off between socialwelfare and the incentive scheme is private information. Weconsider two types of central bankers; one who responds to theincentive scheme (``selfish'') and one who does not and onlycares about social welfare (``benevolent''). We demonstratethat when a benevolent central banker accepts a contractdesigned for a selfish central banker, positive inflationsurprises occur and output exceeds its natural rate. Wefurther show that a benevolent central banker with aninflation bias has an incentive to masquerade as selfish.Mechanisms exist that solve that problem by achievingpreference revelation. We consider a simple mechanism indominant strategies that induces the benevolent type eithernot to breach or not to accept the appointment (contract) inthe first place. This multi-period mechanism works with eitherinflation targets, or the appointment of a conservativecentral banker. Our results suggest that more complicatedincentive schemes, embedded within broader constitutionalarrangements, are required in the presence of privateinformation for them to work effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A. (1987). Macroeconomic policy in a two-party system as a repeated game. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 651–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus, D. and Driffill, J. (1985a). Inflation and reputation. American Economic Review 75: 530–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus, D. and Driffill, J. (1985b). Rational expectations and policy credibility following a change in regime. Review of Economic Studies 52: 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. and Gordon, D.B. (1983a). A positive theory of monetary policy in a natural rate model. Journal of Political Economy 91: 589–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. and Gordon, D.B. (1983b). Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 12: 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1986). Reputation in a model of monetary policy with incomplete information. Journal of Monetary Economics 17: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy 101: 385–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetsma, M.W.J.R. and Jensen, H. (1998). Inflation targets and contracts with uncertain central banker preferences. Journal of Money Credit and Banking 30: 384–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. (1998). Central banking in theory and practice. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J. (1985). The reason of rules: Constitutional political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. (1986). Liberty, market and state: Political economy in the 1980s. Brighton: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. (1987). The constitution of economic policy. American Economic Review 77: 243–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canzoneri, M. (1985). Monetary policy games and the role of private information. American Economic Review 75: 1056–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chortareas, G.E. and Miller, S.M. (2000). Optimal central banker contracts and common agency. Working paper. University of Connecticut. Presented at the January 1999 North American meeting of the Econometric Society, New York.

  • Chortareas, G.E. and Miller, S.M. (2002). Monetary policy delegation contract costs and contract targets. Bulletin of Economic Research (forthcoming).

  • Cukierman A. (1992). Central bank strategy, credibility, and independence: Theory and evidence. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, A. (1995). Towards a systematic comparison between inflation targets and monetary targets. In L. Leiderman and L.E.O. Svensson (Eds.), Inflation targets, 192–209. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research; distributed in North America by the Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.

  • Cukierman, A. and Liviatan, N. (1991). Optimal accommodation by strong policymakers under incomplete information. Journal of Monetary Economics 27:99–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, A. and Meltzer, A.H. (1986). A theory of ambiguity, credibility, and inflation under discretion and asymmetric information. Econometrica 54: 1099–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1996).Special-interest lobbying and endogenous commodity taxation. Eastern Economic Journal 22: 375–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fratianni, M., Hagen, J. von and Waller, C. (1997). Central banking as a political principalagent problem. Economic Inquiry 35: 378–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1971). A noncooperative equilibrium for supergames. Review of Economic Studies 38: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundenberg, D. and Maskin, E. (1986). The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica 54: 533–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, M.R., and Oh, S. (1993). Strategic discipline in monetary policy with private information. American Economic Review 83: 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1994). Protection for sale. American Economic Review 84: 833–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1995). Trade wars and trade talks. Journal of Political Economy 103: 675–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrendorf, B. and Lockwood, B. (1997). Rogoff's conservative central bankers restored. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 29: 476–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, H. (1997). Credibility of optimal monetary delegation. American Economic Review 87: 911–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, H. (2000). Optimal monetary policy cooperation through state-independent contracts with targets. European Economic Review 44: 517–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, G. (1997). Monetary politics and unemployment persistence. Journal of Monetary Economics 39: 303–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, P. (2000). Centralized wage setting, inflation contracts, and the optimal choice of central banker. The Economic Journal 110: 559–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P.I. (1999). Lobbying and international cooperation in tariff setting. Journal of International Economics 47: 345–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, B.T. (1995). Two fallacies concerning central bank independence. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 85: 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, B.T. (1997). Crucial issues concerning central bank independence. Journal of Monetary Economics 39: 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muscatelli, A. (1998). Optimal inflation contracts and inflation targets with uncertain central bank preferences: Accountability through independence? The Economic Journal 108: 529–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muscatelli, A. (1999). Inflation contracts and inflation targets under uncertainty: Why we might need conservative central bankers? Economica 66: 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • al-Nowaihi, A. and Levine, P. (1998). Can political monetary cycles be avoided? Journal of Monetary Economics 42: 525–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (1993). Designing institutions for monetary stability. Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy 39: 33–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (Eds.) (1994). Monetary and fiscal policies: Credibility (Volume 1). Cambridge/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (1985). The optimal degree of commitment to an intermediate monetary target. Quarterly Journal of Economics 100: 1169–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalling. E., Hoeberichts, M. and Eijffinger, S. (1998). Incentive schemes for central bankers under uncertainty: Inflation targets versus contracts. Bank of England Working Paper Series 88.

  • Svensson, L.E.O. (1997). Optimal inflation targets, "conservative" central banks, and linear inflation contracts. American Economic Review 87: 98–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toma, E.F. and Toma, M. (Eds.) (1986). Central bankers, bureaucratic incentives, and monetary policy. Financial and Monetary Policy Studies series, vol. 13. Hingham, MA/Dordrecht/Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Waller, C.J. (1995). Performance contracts for central bankers. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Economic Review September/October: 3–14.

  • Waller, C.J. and Walsh, C.E. (1996). Central-bank independence, economic behavior, and optimal term lengths. American Economic Review 86: 1139–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C.E. (1995a). Optimal contracts for central bankers. American Economic Review 85: 150–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C.E. (1995b). When should central bankers be fired? (working paper). Santa Cruz: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, J. (1986). Signaling in a model of monetary policy with incomplete information. Oxford Economic Papers 38: 443–455.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chortareas, G.E., Miller, S.M. Central Banker Contracts, Incomplete Information, and Monetary Policy Surprises: In Search of a Selfish Central Banker?. Public Choice 116, 271–295 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024883503192

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024883503192

Keywords

Navigation