Skip to main content
Log in

Features of the Logic-and-Probabilistic Risk Theory with Groups of Incompatible Events

  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The propositions and characteristics of the logic-and-probabilistic theory of unsuccess risk with groups of incompatible events were presented, as well as examples of unsuccess risk scenarios and logic and probabilistic models. The problem of identification (training) of the risk logic-and-probabilistic model from the statistical data was stated, and a training algorithm was set forth. Statistical, combinatorial, and logic-and-probabilistic methods of risk analysis were described. High precision and robustness of the logic-and-probabilistic models of unsuccess risk were explained, and in terms of these characteristics the models were compared with other theories of risk and classification of objects. The results obtained can be used for modeling, analysis, and management of risks in complex organizational and technical systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Aivazyan, S.I. and Mkhitaryan, V.S., Prikladnaya statistika i osnovy ekonometriki (Applied Statistics and Fundamentals of Econometrics), Moscow: YUNITI, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dzhonston, Dzh., Ekonometricheskie metody (Econometrical Methods), Moscow: Statistika, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Malenvo, E., Statisticheskie metody v ekonometrii (Statistical Methods in Econometric), Moscow: Statistika, 1975, vol. 1; 1976, vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dougherty, C., Introduction to Econometrics, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Golberg, A., A Course in Econometrics, Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shiryaev, A.I., Veroyatnost' (Probability), Moscow: Nauka, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sharp, W.F., Alexander, G.J., and Bailey, J.V., Fundamentals of Investments, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1993. Translated under the title Investitsii, Moscow: INFRA-M, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pervozvanskii, A.A. and Pervozvanskaya, T.N., Finansovyi rynok: raschet i risk (Financial Market: Expectation and Risk), Moscow: INFRA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marshal, Dzh.F. and Bansal, V.K., Finansovaya inzheniriya. Polnoe rukovodstvo po finansovym novovvedeniyam (Finance Engineering. Handbook on Financial Innovations), Moscow: INFRA-M, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barone-Adesi, G., Giannopoulos, K., and Vosper, L., VaR without Correlations for Non-Linear Portfolios, J. Futures Markets, 1999, no. 19, pp. 553-602.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dupacova, J., Portfolio Optimization via Stochastic Programming: Method of Output Analysis, Math. Meth. Oper. Res., 1999, vol. 50, pp. 245-270.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rockafellar, R.T. and Uryasev, S., Conditional Value-at-Risk for General Loss Distributions, J. Banking Finance, 2002, no. 26.

  13. Kan, Yu.S., Application of the Quantile Optimization to Bond Portfolio Selection, in Stochastic Optimization Techniques. Numerical Methods and Technical Applications, Marti, K., Ed., Berlin: Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ryabinin, I.A., Nadezhnost' i bezopasnost' structurno-slozhnykh sistem (Reliability and Safety of Systems of Complex Structure), St. Petersburg: Politekhnika, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Volik, B.G. and Ryabinin, I.A., Efficiency, Reliability, and Survivability of the Control Systems, Avtom. Telemekh., 1984, no. 12, pp. 151-160.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ryabinin, I.A., A Suggestion of a New Measure of System Components Importance by Means of a Boolean Difference, Microelectron. Reliability, 1994, vol. 34, no.4, pp. 603-613.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Solozhentsev, E.D., Karasev, V.V., and Solozhentsev, V.E., Logiko-veroyatnostnye modeli riska v bankakh, biznese i kachestve (Logic-and-Probabilistic Risk Models in Banks, Business, and Quality), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Solojentsev, E.D. and Karassev, V.V., Risk Logic and Probabilistic Models in Business and Identification of Risk Models, Informatica, 2001, no. 25, pp. 49-55.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Solozhentsev, E.D. and Karasev, V.V., Identification of the Logic-and-Probabilistic Risk Models Systems of Complex Structure, Avtom. Telemekh., 2002, no. 3, pp. 97-113.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Seitz, J. and Stickel, E., Consumer Loan Analysis Using Neural Network. Adaptive Intelligent Systems, Proc. Bankai Workshop, 1992, Brussels, pp. 177-189.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solozhentsev, E.D. Features of the Logic-and-Probabilistic Risk Theory with Groups of Incompatible Events. Automation and Remote Control 64, 1186–1201 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024750605611

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024750605611

Keywords

Navigation