Skip to main content
Log in

Jeopardy Not Bonus Status for African American Women in the Work Force: Why Does the Myth of Advantage Persist?

  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

African American women in the United States have a long history of employment outside of their homes. Their experiences are unique from other groups of majority and minority men and women due to the interaction of race, gender, and class. Despite long-standing and continuing struggles against discrimination, harassment, low pay, tokenism, and stereotypes, a myth that African American women enjoy a bonus or advantaged status in the work force has developed and persisted. In this article, Black women's work force experiences are examined from a social constructionist framework, misperceptions of Black women are critiqued, explanations are developed that explain the unique status of African American women and recommendations are proposed to eradicate the discrimination and marginal status that Black women have endured in the work force.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, K. A. (1980). Who has the final word? Sex, race and dominance behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. R., Epps, E. G., & Haniff, N. Z. (1991). College in black and white. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almquist, E. M. (1975). Untangling the effects of race and sex: The disadvantaged status of black women. Social Science Quarterly 56, 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almquist, E. M. (1979). Minorities, gender and work. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A. (1986). Gender stereotypes: Traditions ad alternatives (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A. (1992). Gender: Stereotypes and roles (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beale, F. (1970). Double jeopardy: To be black and female. In T. Cade (Ed.), The black woman (pp. 90–100). New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, F. (1988). The economic status of black woman in the U.S.: The impact of social policy and continued occupational segregation (Res. Report: Wellesley College Center for Research on Women, Vol. 2, p. 2).

  • Bowman, P. J. (1991). Work Life. In J. S. Jackson (Ed.), Life in black America (pp. 129–155). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. R. (1988). Employment and health among older black women: Implications for their economic status (Research Report: Wellesley College Center for Research on Women, Vol. 2, pp. 3–4).

  • Bullough, V. L. (1973). The subordinate sex: A history of attitudes toward women. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. ia]Bureau of the census (1980). The social and economic status of the Black population in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (1959). The masks of God: Primitive mythology. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli, L. L. (1990). Gender, language and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 941–951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chester, N. L. (1983). Sex differentiations in two high school environments: Implications for career development among black female adolescent females. Journal of Social Issues, 39(3), 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beauvoir, S. (1953) The second sex. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defour, D. C. (1991). Issues in mentoring ethnic minority students. Focus, 5, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, P. B., & Piore, M. J. (1975). Unemployment and the dual labor market. Public Interest, 38, 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichelberger, B. (1977). Voices on black feminism. Quest: A Feminist Quarterly, 4, 16–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, C. F. (1973). Positive effects of the multiple negative: Explaining the success of black professional women. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 912–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R., & Allen, W. R. (1987). The color line and the quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F., & Hesse-Biber, S. (1984). Women at work. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulbright, K. (1986). The myth of the double advantage: Black female managers. In M. C. Simms & J. Malveaux (Eds.), Slipping through the cracks: The status of black women (pp. 33–46). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilkes, C. T. (1981). From slavery to social welfare; Racism and the control of black women. In A. Smerdlow & H. Lessinger (Eds.), Class, race and sex: The dynamics of control (pp. 288–300). Boston: G. K. Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. G., & Mitchell, T. R. (1979). Attributional processes of leaders in leader-member interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 429–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, P., & Pruitt, A. (1978). Conference on the educational and occupational needs of black women. (Report no. UD018393). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education Equity Group, Women's research division. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 156 768).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, B. B., Markson, E. W., & Stein, P. J. (1992). Racial and ethnic minorities: An overview. In P. S. Rothenberg (Ed.), Race, class and gender in the United States (pp. 145–155). New York: St. Martin's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill-Collins, P. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge. ei]Hull, G. T., Scott, P. B., & Smith, B. (Eds.). (1982). But some of us are brave. Old Westbury, NY: Feminist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, A. (1989). Relating to privilege: Seduction and rejection in the subordination of white women and women of color. Signs, 14, 833–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M., & Stein, B. (1980). A tale of “O”: On being different in an organization. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a black feminist ideology. Signs, 14, 42–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladner, J. A. (1972). Tomorrow's tomorrow: The black woman. New York: Doubleday. ei]Lerner, G. (Ed.). (1973). Black women in white America: A documentary history. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, L. G., & Saenz, D. S. (1985). Memory deficits and memory surfeits: Differential cognitive consequences of tokenism for tokens and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 918–926.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B. (1987). Women's lives. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malveaux, J. (1981). Shifts in the occupational and employment status of Black women: Current trends and future implications (pp. 133–168). In Black working women. Proceedings of a conference on black working women in the U.S. Berkeley: University of California.

  • Malveaux, J. (1990). Gender differences and beyond: An economic perspective on diversity and commonality among women. In D. L. Rhode (Ed.), Theoretical perspectives on sexual difference (226–238). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marable, M. (1983). Groundings with my sisters: Patriarchy and the exploitation of black women. Journal of Ethnic Studies, 11, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkomo, S. (1986). Race and sex: The forgotten case of the black female manager. Paper presented at the Sixth Annual International Conference on Women in Organizations.

  • Paludi, M. A. (1992). The psychology of women. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickford, L. J. (1985). The superstructure of myths supporting the subordination of women. In B. A. Stead (Ed.), Women in management (pp. 165–174). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, P. T. (1988). Racism and sexism: Comparisons and conflicts. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism (pp. 203–221). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rix, S. E. (1988). The Reagan years: Budgetary backlash. In E. Boneparth & E. Stoper (Eds.), Women, power and policy: Toward the year 2000 (2nd ed., pp. 66–85). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E. (1977). Professional schools and their impact on black women. Presented at the Conference on the Educational and Occupational Rights of Black Women (Vol. 2, Research Papers). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education. ei]Simms, M. C., & Malveaux, J. (Eds.). (1986). Slipping through the cracks: The status of black women. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. J. (1982). The black female adolescent: A review of the educational, career, and psychological literature. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 6, 261–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, N. J. (1992). Black women and white women in the professions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead, B. A. (1985). Women in management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg, A. H., & Harkess, S. (1978). Women working. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield. ia]Study of Black females cites role of praise. (1985, June 25). The New York Times, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., & Myers, D. G. (1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 409–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, M. (1984, July). The all time definite map of the gender gap. Ms., pp. 55–60.

  • Thomas, D. A. (1989). Black experiences of gaining mentoring and sponsorship in organizations. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Unger, R. K., & Crawford, M. (1992). Women and gender. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weathers, D. (1981, April). Winning under the double whammy. Savvy, pp. 34–40.

  • Williams, C. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the female professions. Social Problems, 39, 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, C., & Frank, H. (1975). The solo woman in a professional peer group. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 45, 164–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yarkin, K. L., Town, J. P., & Wallston, B. S. (1982). Blacks and women must try harder: Stimulus persons' race and sex attributions of causality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanchez-Hucles, J.V. Jeopardy Not Bonus Status for African American Women in the Work Force: Why Does the Myth of Advantage Persist?. Am J Community Psychol 25, 565–580 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024678732098

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024678732098

Navigation