Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the effect of osmotic potential in a modified 85D12 medium on both callus induction and plant regeneration in the anther culture of two wheat genotypes, cv. Chris and cv. Pavon. Altering the medium osmotic potential by changing the carbohydrate source and concentration or by adding a non-metabolized osmoticum appeared to have the greatest potential for improving anther-derived green plant production. The medium osmotic potentials were varied (-0.67 to −2.30 MPa) by altering sucrose and PEG concentration. Both osmotica affected callus production, with −0.9 to −1.4 MPa media producing the most calluses. Callus production depended on genotype and osmoticum. Only PEG concentration affected green plant regeneration. The greatest number of green plants (11.5 plants per 100 anthers in cv. Chris) was obtained with 0.0125 M of PEG. This experiment suggested that a low level of PEG in the medium was beneficial for producing green plants from wheat anthers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd El-Maksoud MM, Karsai I & Bedö Z (1993) Agronomic traits of wheat lines developed by the doubled haploid, single seed descent and pedigree methods after three cycles of selection. Acta Agr. Hung. 42: 377–382
Brown DCW, Leung DWM & Thorpe TA (1979) Osmotic requirement for shoot formation in tobacco callus. Physiol. Plant. 46: 36–41
Brown DCW & Thorpe TA (1980) Changes in water potential and its components during shoot formation in tobacco callus. Physiol. Plant. 49: 83–87
Davidson DJ & Chevalier PM (1987) Influence of polyethylene glycol-induced water deficits on tiller production in spring wheat. Crop Sci. 27: 1185–1187
Dodds JH & Roberts LW (1985) Experiments in Plant Tissue Culture. In: Experiments in Plant Tissue Culture (pp. 156–171). Cambridge Universtiy Press, New York
Dube SD (1984) Genotypic differences for callus formation in immature anthers of wheat Triticum aestivum. Crop Improv. 11: 64–65
Hoekstra S, van Bergen S, van Brouwershaven IR, Schilperoort RA & Heidekamp F (1996) The interaction of 2,4-D application and mannitol pre-treatment in anther and microspore culture of Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Igri. J. Plant Physiol. 148: 696–700
Hu H, Xi Z, Ouyang J, Hao S, He M, Xu Z & Zou M (1980) Chromosome variation of pollen mother cell of pollen-derived plants in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci. Sin. 23: 905–912
Ilíc-Grubor K, Attree SM & Fowke LC (1998) Induction of microspore-derived embryos of Brassica napus L. with poly-ethylene glycol (PEG) as osmoticum in a low sucrose medium. Plant Cell Rep. 17: 329–333
Kao KN (1993) Viability, cell division and microcallus formation of barley microspores in culture. Plant Cell Rep. 12: 366–369
Karsai I & Bedö Z (1998) Relationship between anther culture response and aluminium tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 100: 249–252
Kovács G & Barnabás (1997) Selection for frost tolerance in anther culture-derived embryos and regeneration of frost-tolerant fertile DH plants in winter wheat. Acta Agr. Hung. 45: 285–293
Kudirka DT, Schaeffer GW & Baenziger PS (1989) Stability of ploidy in meristems of plants regenerated from anther calli of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.). Genome 32: 1068–1073
Lawlor DW (1970) Absorption of polyethylene glycol by plants and their effects on plant growth. New Phytol. 69: 501–513
Lazar MD, Chen THH, Scoles GJ & Kartha KK (1987) Immature embryo and anther culture of chromosome addition lines of rye in Chinese spring wheat. Plant Sci. 51: 77–81
Levitt J (1969) Introduction to Plant Physiology. In: Introduction to Plant Physiology (pp. 44–50). Mosby Company, Saint Louis
Liang GH, Xu A & Tang H (1987) Direct generation of wheat haploids via anther culture. Crop Sci. 27: 336–339
Linossier L, Veisseire P, Cailloux F & Coudret A (1997) Effects of abscisic acid and high concentrations of PEG on Hevea brasiliensis somatic embryo development. Plant Sci. 124: 183–191
Luckett DJ & Darvey NL (1992) Utilization of microspore culture in wheat and barley improvement. Aust. J. Bot. 40: 807–828
McGregor LM & McHughen A (1990) The influence of various cultural factors on anther culture of four cultivars of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Can. J. Plant Sci. 70: 183–191
Metz SG, Sharma HC, Armstrong TA & Mascia PN (1988) Chromosome doubling and aneuploidy in anther-derived plants from two winter wheat lines. Genome 30: 177–181
Palmer RG & Heer H (1973) A root-tip squash technique for soybean chromosomes. Crop Sci. 13: 389–391
Rains DW(1989) Plant tissue and protoplast culture: application to stress physiology and biochemistry. In: Jones HG, Flowers TJ & Jones MB (eds) Plants Under Stress (pp. 181–196). Cambridge University Press, London
Schaeffer GW, Baenziger PS & Worley J (1979) Haploid plant development from anthers and in vitro embryo culture of wheat. Crop Sci. 19: 697–702
Shivanna KR, Saxena NP & Seetharama N (1997) An improvised medium for in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of chickpea. Int. Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter 4: 28–29
Thörn EC (1988) Effect of melibiose and polyethylene glycol on anther culture response of barley. In: Int. Congress Genetic Manipulation and Plant Breeding-Biotechnol. Breed. (p. 8)
Tschaplinski TJ, Gebre GM, Dahl JE, Roberts GT & Tuskan GA (1995) Growth and solute adjustment of calli of Populus clones cultured on nutrient medium containing polyethylene glycol. Can. J. For. Res. 25: 1425–1433
van der Weele CM, Spollen WG, Sharp RE & Baskin TI (2000) Growth of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings under water deficit studied by control of water potential in nutrient-agar media. J. Exp. Bot. 51: 1555–1562
Zhang HQ & Croes AF (1982) A new medium for pollen germination in vitro. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 31: 113–119
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, TJ., Yang, MS. & Deckard, E.L. The effect of osmotic potential on anther culture in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 75, 35–40 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024643526923
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024643526923