Skip to main content
Log in

Testing the Buchanan-Wagner Hypothesis: European Evidence from Panel Unit Root and Cointegration Tests

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the Buchanan-Wagnerhypothesis, public deficits reduce theperceived price of public goods to thecurrent generation of voters who, in turn,increase the demands for such socialservices. Several recent studies haveattempted to test this proposition. In thispaper, we apply modern time seriestechniques organized around panel unit rootand panel cointegration to draw sharperconclusions from the short time series thatare typically available. We find that thereis a long run positive relationship betweengovernment spending and government deficitsfor each country individually, as well asfor the panel as a whole. This providessupport for the BW hypothesis. We alsoanalyze the implications for the relativeproductivity performance of the public andprivate sector, the existence of scaleeconomies in the provision of publicservices, as well as the extent of crowdingout effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashworth, J. (1995). The empirical relationship between budgetary deficits and government expenditure growth: An examination using cointegration. Public Finance 50: 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergston, T. and Goodman, R. (1973). Private demands for public goods. American Economic Review 63: 280-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitung, L. (1999). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Discussion Paper. Berlin: Humboldt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and Wagner, R.E. (1977). Democracy in deficit. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courakis, A.S., Roque-Moura, F. and Tridimas, G. (1993). Public expenditure growth in Greece and Portugal: Wagner's law and beyond. Applied Economics 25: 125-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craigwell, R. (1991). Government deficits and spending in Barbados: An empirical test of the Buchanan-Wagner hypothesis. Public Finacce 46: 373-381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demopoulos, G.D., and Prodromidis, K.P. (1994). Fiscal discipline in the European Monetary Union. Atlantic Economic Journal 22: 1-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R.F. and Granger, C.W.G. (1987). Co-integration and error correction representation estimation and testing. Econometrica 55: 251-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.D.F. and Tzavalis, E. (1999). Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed. Journal of Econometrics 91: 201-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hondroyiannis, G. and Papapetrou, E. (1995). An examination of Wagner's law for Greece: A cointegration analysis. Public Finance 50: 67-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hondroyiannis, G. and Papapetrou, E. (2001). An investigation of the public deficits and governemnt spending relationship: Evidence for Greece. Public Choice 107: 169-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, S.K., Pesaran, H. M. and Shin, Y. (1997). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panel. Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economics Dynamic and Control 12: 231-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. and Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference in cointegration - with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52: 169-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A.H. (1988). Public spending and deficits: Evidence from a developing economy. Public Finance 43: 396-402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P. and Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics 54: 159-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A. and Lin, C.F. (1992). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Mimeo.

  • Niskanen, W.A. (1978). Deficits, government spending and inflation: What is evidence? Journal of Monetary Economics 4: 591-602.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell, P.G.J. (1998). The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. Journal of International Economics 44: 1-19.

  • Pedroni, P. (1997). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. New results. Department of Economics, Indiana University, manuscript.

  • Pedroni, P. (2000). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. In: B. Baldagi, T.B. Fomby end R.C. Hill (Eds.), Non-stationary panels: Panel cointegration and dynamic panels, Vol. 15, pp. 93-130. Connecticut: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierse, R.G. and Shell, A.J. (1995). Temporal aggregation and the power of tests for unit root. Journal of Econometrics 65: 335-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P.C.B. and Hansen, B.E. (1990). Statistical inference in individual variables regression with I(1) process. Review of Economic Studies 57: 99-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provopoulos, G.A. (1982). Public spending and deficits: The Greek experience. Public Finance 37: 422-426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tridimas, G. (1992). Budgetary deficits and government expenditure growth: Toward a more accurate empirical specification. Public Finance Quarterly 20: 3275-3297.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christopoulos, D.K., Tsionas, E.G. Testing the Buchanan-Wagner Hypothesis: European Evidence from Panel Unit Root and Cointegration Tests. Public Choice 115, 439–453 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024213614689

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024213614689

Keywords

Navigation