Abstract
Purpose : This study was conducted on cryoprotective activity of ethylene glycol (ETG) and propanediol (PROH) on cleavage rate of mouse zygotes.
Methods : Mouse oocytes were excised from fallopian tube of gonadotropin-treated mice, then inseminated with spermatozoa. After 16.5–17.5 h, zygotes were randomly allocated into three groups; control, toxicity, and frozen. In the latter, zygotes were slowly cooled with ETG and PROH similar to those used for human embryo cryopreservation. The survived zygotes cultured for 120 h and their later stages of development were compared with nonfrozen embryos.
Results : The toxicity test showed that no differences were observed in cleavage rate between exposed and nonexposed embryos. The survival and expanded hatching blastocyst rate of embryos frozen with PROH was significantly better than with ETG (92.8 vs. 58.2% and 68.2 vs. 39.1%, respectively).
Conclusions : ETG does not appear to be a good alternative to the classical PROH for freezing of mouse zygotes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Emilliani S, Bergh MVD, Vannin AS, Biramane J, Englert Y: Comparison of ethylene glycol, 1,2-propanediol and glycerol for cryopreservation of slow-cooled mouse zygotes, 4-cell embryos and blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2000;15:905-910
Trounson A, Mohr L: Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature 1983;305:707-709
Zeilmaker GH, Alberda AT, van Getn I, Rijkmans CMPM, Drogenkijk AC: Two pregnancies following transfer of intact frozen-thawed embryos. Fertil Steril 1984;42:293-296
Veeik LL, Maloney MK, Amundson CH, Muasher SJ, Borthman LJ, Jones HW, DeScisciolo C: Significantly enhanced pregnancy rates per cycle through cryopreservation and thaw of pronuclear stage oocytes. Fertil Steril 1993;59:1202-1207
Balakier H, Maclusky NJ, Casper RF: Charaterisation of the first cell cycle in human zygotes: Implications for cryopreservation. Fertile Steril 1993;59:359-365
Li R, Cameron AWN, Batt PA, Trounson AO: Maximum survival of frozen goat embryos is attained at the expanded, hatching and hatched blastocyst stages of development. Reprod Fertil Dev 1990;2:345-350
Cocero MJ, Sebastian AL, Barragan ML: Differences on post-thawing survival between ovine morulae and blastocysts cryopreserved with ethylene glycol or glycerol. Cryobiology 1996;33:502-507
Leibo SP: Equilibrium and nonequilibrium cryopreservation of embryos. Theriogenology 1989;31:85-93
Fridler S, Giudice LC, Lamb EJ: Cryopreservation of embryo and ova. Fertil Steril 1988;49:743-762
Al-hasani S, Hepnar C, Diedrich K, Van der Ven H, Krebs D: Cryopreservation of rabbit zygotes. Hum Reprod 1992;7(Suppl):81-83
Van der Auwera I, Cornillie F, Ongkowidjojo R, Pijnenborg R, Koninck xPR: Cryopreservation of pronucleate mouse ova: Slow versus ultrarapid freezing. Hum Reprod 1990;5(5):619-621
Liu J, Van den Abeel E, Van Steirteghem AC: Assessment of ultrarapid and slow freezing procedures for 1-cell and 4-cell mouse embryos. Hum Reprod 1993;8(7):1115-1119
Van den Abbeel E, Van de Elst J, Van Steirteghem AC: The effect of temperature at which slow cooling is terminated and of thawing rate on the survival of 1-cell mouse embryos frozen in dimethylsulphoxide or 1,2-propanediol solutions. Cryobiology 1994;31(5):423(Abstract)
Tesarik J, Hanzelka Z, Travnik P: Developmental capacity of human embryos after cryopreservation in the unicellular zygote stage. Cesk Gynekol 1989;54(10):740-747
Wright G, Wiker S, Elsner C, Kort H, Massey J, Mitchell D, Toledo A, Cohen J: Observations on the morphology of pronuclei and nucleoli in human zygotes and implications for cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 1990;5(1):109-115
Kasai M, Nishimori M, Zhu SE, Sakurai T, Machida T: Survival of mouse morulla vitrified in an ethylene glycol-based solution after exposure to the solution at various temperatures. Biol Reprod 1992;47:1134-1139
Donnay I, Auquer P, Kaidi S: Vitrification of in vitro produced bovine blastocysts: Methodological studies and developmental capacity. Anim Reprod Sci 1998;52:93-104
Sommerfeld V, Niemann H: Cryopreservation of bovine in vitro produced embryos using ethylene glycol in controlled freezing or vitrification. 1999;38:95-105
Ali J, Shelton JN: Vitrification of pre-implantation stages of mouse embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1993;98:450-465
Zhu SE, Kasai M, Otoge H, Sakurai T, Machida T: Cryopreservation of expanded mouse blastocysts by vitrification in ethylene glycol-based solutions. J Reprod Fertil 1993;98:139-145
Shaw JM, Ward C, Trounson AO: Evaluation of propanediol, ethylene glycol, sucrose and antifreeze proteins on the survival of slow-cooled mouse pronuclear and 4-cell embryos. Hum Reprod 1995;38:95-105
Quinn P, Barros C, Whittingham DG: Preservation of hamster oocytes to assay the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1982;66:161-168
Wood MJ, Whittingham DG, Lee SH: Low temperature preservation of oocytes and embryos. In Mammalian Development: A Practical Approach, M. Monk (Ed), Oxford, IRL Press, 1987, pp 255-280
Nakao KN, Nakagata N, Katsuki M: Simple and efficient vitrification procedure for cryopreservation of mouse embryos. Exp Anim 1997;46(3):231-234
Tarkowski 1966
Satsuma et al. 1998
Abramczuk J, Solter D, Koprowski H: The beneficial effect of EDTA on development of mouse one-cell embryos in chemically defined medium. Dev Biol 1977;61:378-383
Gardner DK, Lane M: Alleviation of the ‘2-cell block’ and development to the blastocyst of CF1 mouse embryos: Role of amino acids, EDTA and physical parameters. Hum Reprod 1996;11(12):2703-2712
Li R, Trounson A: Rapid freezing of the mouse blastocyst: Effects of cryoprotectants and of time and temperature of exposure to the cryoprotectant before direct plunging into liquid nitrogen. Reprod Fertil Dev 1991;3:175-183
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bafrani, H.H., Salsabili, N., Pasbakhsh, P. et al. Comparison of 1,2-Propanediol and Ethylene Glycol for Cryopreservation of Slow-Cooled Mouse Zygotes and Their Subsequent Development. J Assist Reprod Genet 20, 234–240 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024159512353
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024159512353