Abstract
Three-dimensional global circulation models (GCMs) are ‘state-of-the-art’ tools for projecting possible changes in climate. GCM simulations have frequently been validated against observations in terms of time-averaged variables while daily time series have not been studied extensively. In this paper, 30-year simulations of daily extreme temperatures are compared with the 30-year series recorded in Moravia. Attention is focused on the annual cycles, trimmed characteristics and average interdiurnal variability which are calculated for the average simulated series (4 gridpoints) and the average time series recorded in Moravia (5 stations). It is shown that daily extreme temperature variability is underestimated in the simulations, maximum (minimum) temperatures being underestimated (overestimated). Generally, the persistence of the simulated series is much higher, and small day-to-day changes are observed more frequenly than those in reality. The model is unable to reflect large changes between two consecutive days.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beersma J.J., 1992: GCM Control Run of UK Meterological Office Compared with the Real Climate in the NW European Winter. Sci. Report WR 92-02, De Bilt, 32 pp.
Buishand T.A. and Beersma J.J., 1993: Jackknife Tests for Differences in Autocorrelation between Climate Time Series. J. Climate, 6, 2490-2495.
Cao H.X., Mitchell J.F.B. and Lavery J.R., 1992: Simulated Diurnal Range and Variability of Surface Temperature in a Global Climate Model for Present and Doubled CO2 Climate. J. Climate, 5, 920-943.
Carter T.R., Parry M.L., Nishioka S. and Harasawa H., 1992: Preliminary Guidelines for Assessing Impacts of Climate Change. The IPCC WG II Report. Environmental Change Unit and Center for Global Environmental Research, 28 pp.
DKRZ (eds), 1993: The ECHAM3 Atmospheric General Circulation Model. Report No.6, Deutsches Klimarechnenzentrum, Hamburg, 184 pp.
Dubrovský M., 1993: Robust Locally Weighted Regression: Algorithm, Programming and Application to Radiation Data. IAP Report, Charles University, Prague
Dubrovský M., 1996: MET&ROLL-the Weather Generator for the Crop Growth Model. In: Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Climate Variability and Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation, Prague 1995, 285-293.
Georgi F. and Mearns L.O., 1991: Approaches to the Simulation of Regional Climate Change: A Review. Reviews of Geophysics, 29, 191-216.
Havránek P., 1993: Statistical Methods in Biology and Medicine. Academia, Prague, 478 pp. (in Czech)
Houghton J.T., Meira Filho L.G., Callander B.A., Harris N., Kattenberg A. and Maskell. K., (eds), 1996: Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. The IPCC WGI Report. Cambridge Univ. Press, 572 pp.
Huth R., 1997: Continental Scale Circulation in the UKHI GCM. J. Climate, 10, 1545-1561.
Kalstein L.S. (ed), 1991: Global Comparisons of Selected GCM Control Runs and Observed Climate Data, U.S. EPA Report.
Kalvová J. and Nemešová I., 1997: Estimating Autocorrelations of Daily Extreme Temperatures in Observed and Simulated Climates. Submitted to Theor.Appl.Climatol.
Katz R.W., 1992: Role of Statistics in the Validation of General Circulation Models. Climate Res., 2, 35-45.
Mearns L.O., Schneider S.H., Thompson S.L. and McDaniel L.R., 1990: Analysis of Climate Variability in General Circulation Models: Comparison with Observations and Changes in Variability in 2×CO2 Experiments. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 20469-20490.
Morison J.I.L. and Butterfield R.E., 1990: Cereal Crop Damage by Frost, Spring 1990. Weather, 45, 308-313.
Parry M.L., Carter T.R. and Konijn N.T., 1988: The Impact of Climatic Variations on Agriculture, Volume 1: Assessments in Cool Temperature and Cold Regions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 888 pp.
Ponater M., Koenig W., Sausen R. and Sielmann F., 1994: Circulation Regime Fluctuations and their Effect on Interseasonal Variability in the ECHAM Climate Model. Tellus, 46A, 265-285.
Schlesinger M.E. and Mitchell J.F.B., 1987: Climate Model Simulations of the Equilibrium Climatic Response to Increased Carbon Dioxide. Reviews of Geophysics, 254, 760-798.
Smith J.B., Huq S., Lenhart S., Mata L.J., Nemešová I. and Toure S., 1996: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 366 pp.
Viner D. and Hulme M., 1994: Climate Change Scenarios for Impact Studies in the UK. Report, Contract No PECD 7/12/96, Climatic Research Unit, Norwich, University of East Anglia, 70 pp.
Wang D. and Mayer L., 1994: Effect of Storm Clustering on Water Balance Estimates and its Implications for Climate Impact Assessment. Clim. Change, 27, 321-342.
Watson R.T., Zinyowera M.C., Moss R.H. and Dokken D.J. (eds), 1996: Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change. The IPCC WGII Report, Cambridge Univ. Press, 878 pp.
Willmott C.J. and Legates D.R., 1993: A Comparison of GCM-Simulated and Observed Mean January and July Surface Air Temperature. J. Climate, 6, 274-291.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nemešová, I., Kalvová, J. On the Validity of ECHAM-Simulated Daily Extreme Temperatures. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 41, 396–406 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023315618854
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023315618854