Skip to main content
Log in

Religious Parties, Religious Political Identity, and the Cold Shoulder of Liberal Democratic Thought

  • Published:
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elements of the relation between religion and politics are standard themes in political theory: toleration and free exercise rights; the parameters of separation of church and state; arguments for and against constraints imposed on religious discourse by philosophic norms of “public reason”. But religious parties and partisanship are no part of political theory, despite contemporary interest in “value pluralism” and in liberal democratic theory's capacity to address multicultural, religious, and ethnic group claims. This essay argues that religious parties are missing elements in discussions of “identity politics”. They play an important role not just in expressing but also in constructing and mobilizing religious political identity. Political activity linked to parties is a principal way of bringing diffuse, politically unorganized groups, whose leaders are self-appointed and not regularly accountable for the way they represent co-religionists in political life, into the democratic mainstream. With political organization and especially partisanship, the “fact of pluralism” is made concrete for democratic purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, M.L., Piety and Politics: Recent Work on German Catholicism, Journal of Modern History 63 (December 1991), pp. 681–716.

  • Audi, R., The Separation of Church and State and the Obligations of Citizenship, Philosophy and Public Affairs 18(3) (1989), pp. 259–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V., Religious Pluralism: Secularism or Priority for Democracy? Political Theory 27(5) (1999), pp. 597–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B., Culture and Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S., Religious Transformation and the Future of Politics, in S. Berger, A. Hirschman, and C. Maier (eds.), Changing Boundaries of the Political: Essays on the Evolving Balance Between the State and Society, Public and Private in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, S., The Moral Majority: The Politics of Fundamentalism in Secular Society, in L. Caplan (ed.), Studies in Religious Fundamentalism. New York: MacMillan Press, 1987, pp. 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, P., Interest Organizations, Political Parties, and the Study of Democratic Politics, in A.N. Costain, and A.S. McFarland (eds.), Social Movements and American Political Institutions. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998, pp. 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caciagli, M., Winter, L., Mintzel, A., Culla, J., and Brouwer, A., Christian Democracy in Europe. Barcelona: ICPS, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary, N., The Path to Christian Democracy: German Catholics and the Party System from Windthorst to Adenauer. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J., Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, O., The Secularization of the European Mind in the 19 th Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., From Accommodation to Decision: Transformations in Israel's Religio-Political Life, Journal of Church and State 38 (Autumn 1996), pp. 817–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Almagor, R., Disqualification of Political Parties in Israel: 1988–1996, Emory International Law Review 67 (Spring 1997).

  • Costain, A.N., and McFarland, A.S. (eds.), Social Movements and American Political Institutions. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, S., Not By Politics Alone: The Enduring Influence of the Christian Right. New York: Guilford Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, M., Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einaudi, M., and Goguel, F., Christian Democracy in Italy and France. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenach, E., The Next Religious Establishment: National Identity and Political Theology in Post-Protestant America. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Employment Division v. Smith, 485 U.S. 660 (1988).

  • Fullinwider, R.K. (ed.), Civil Society, Democracy, and Civic Renewal. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A.D., The Making of Post-Christian Britain: A History of the Secularization of Modern Society. New York: Longman, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J.C., The Christian Right and the 1994 Elections, P.S.: Political Science & Politics 28(1) (1995), p. 508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J.C., Gurth, J.L., and Wilcox, C., Less Than Conquerors: The Christian Right in State Republican Parties, in A.N. Costain and A.S. McFarland (eds.), Social Movements and American Political Institutions. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenawalt, K., Five Questions about Religion Judges are Afraid to Ask, in N.L. Rosenblum (ed.), Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith: Religious Accommodation in Pluralist Democracies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 196–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, J.R., Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Bloomington: University of Illinois, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A., and Thompson, D., Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., A Genealogical Analysis of the cognitive Content of Morality, in Inclusion of the Other. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, N.O., The Democratization of American Christianity. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsohn, G.J., By the Light of Reason: Corruption, Religious Speech, and Constitutional Essentials, in N.L. Rosenblum (ed.), Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith: Religious Accommodation in Pluralist Democracies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 294–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, S.N., The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, S.N., Democracy and Religious Politics: Evidence from Belgium, Comparative Political Studies (June 1998), pp. 292–320.

  • Kalyvas, S.N., Commitment Problems in Emerging Democracies: The Case of Religious Parties, Comparative Politics (July 2000), pp. 379–398.

  • Kymlicka, W., Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lienesch, M., Redeeming America: Piety and Politics in the New Christian Right. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A., The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manin, B., Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel v. Paty et al, 435 U.S. 618 (1978).

  • Moore, R.L., Selling God: American Religion in the Marketplace of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morone, J., Hellfire Nation: Morality in American Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B., Rethinking Multiculturalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzorno, A., Politics Unbound, in S. Berger, A. Hirschman, and C. Maier (eds.), Changing Boundaries of the Political: Essays on the Evolving Balance Between the State and Society, Public and Private in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., The Idea of Public Reason Revisited, in The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R., and Mackie, T.T., Do Parties Persist or Fail? in K. Lawson and P.H. Merkl (eds.), When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organizations, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, N.L. (ed.), Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith: Religious Accommodation in Pluralist Democracies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, N.L. and Post, R. (eds.), Civil Society and Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstone, S., Behr, R., and Lazarus, E., Third Parties in America: Citizen Response to Major Party Failure. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozell, M.J., and Wilcox, C. (eds.), God at the Grass Roots. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E.E. Party Government New York: Farrar and Reinhart, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkansky, I., The Politics of Religion and the Religion of Politics: Looking at Israel. New York: Lexington Books, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, B.J., Habermas and Religious Inclusion: Lessons from Kant's Moral Theology, Political Theory 27(5) (1999), pp. 634–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk, M., Spiritual Politics: Religion and America Since World War II. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorauf, F.J., Political Action Committees in the U.S., in K. Lawson and P.H. Merkl (eds.), When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organizations, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, Y., Remember Amaleq: Religious Hate Speech, in N.L. Rosenblum (ed.), Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith: Religious Accommodation in Pluralist Democracies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 321–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S., The Very Excess of Democracy, in A.N. Costain and A.S. McFarland (eds.), Social Movements and American Political Institutions. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennessee Constitution, Art. VIII, par. 1, 1796.

  • Torfs, R., International Church-State Symposium: Church and State in France, Belgium, and the Netherlands, B.Y.U.L. Rev. (1996).

  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., and Brady, H.E., Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J., Actions and Accommodations, unpublished paper on file with the author, (2002) p. 22.

  • Warner, C.M., Confessions of an Interest Group: The Catholic Church and Political Parties in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weithman, P.J. (ed.), Religion and Contemporary Liberalism. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S., The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R., The Restructuring of American Religion: Society and Faith since World War II. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenblum, N.L. Religious Parties, Religious Political Identity, and the Cold Shoulder of Liberal Democratic Thought. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6, 23–53 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023246418937

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023246418937

Navigation