Skip to main content
Log in

Emancipatory Responses to Oppression: The Template of Land-Use Planning and the Old Order Amish of Ontario

  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

In this paper I discuss the clash of values between the Old Order Amish community of Ontario and the dominant social paradigm in agriculture. Land-use and agricultural regulations, designed for an industrial style of agriculture, are experienced as a threat to the survival of the Old Order Amish agricultural social economy and community. The paper describes how I have worked with the Old Order Amish to respond to these challenges and to create public policies that will allow them to maintain their human and agricultural diversity and small-scale sustainable farm practices. Four case studies illuminating the oppressive land-use regulations along with the emancipatory responses to the oppression are examined. The social transformation themes include principles and processes for community psychologists, land-use planners, and community economic development practitioners to consider. The article has heuristic value for a practice-based approach to social change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow, M., & Campbell, B. (1993). Take back the nation 2: Meeting the threat of NAFTA. Toronto: Key Porter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, E. M. (1970). A social systems approach to health planning in rural communities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, E. M. (1987). Social intervention: Theory and practice. In E. M. Bennett (Ed.), Social intervention: Theory and practice (pp. 13­28). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, E. M., (1992). Community­based economic development: A strategy for primary prevention. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 11(2), 11­33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, E. M., & Heise, D. (1998). Fair share for farmers: Community­shared agriculture. In M. MacAdam (Ed.), From corporate greed to common good: Canadian churches and community economic development (pp. 106­114). Ottawa, ON: Novalis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, J. (1983). Structural characteristics of the macroeconomy and mental health: Implications for primary prevention research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 553­571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Institute of Planners (CIP). (1994). Statement of values and code of professional conduct. Ottawa, ON: Author.

  • Catalano, R., & Dooley, D. (1980). Economic change in primary prevention. In R. H. Price, R. F. Kettere, B. C. Bader, & J. Monahan (Eds.), Prevention in mental health: Research, policy and practice (pp. 21­40). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, J. (1994). The consequences of our actions: A value issue in community devlopment. Community Development Journal, 29, 75­89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzionoi, A. (1967). Mixed scanning: A “third” approach to decision­making. Public Administration Review, 27, 385­292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1973). Retracking America: A theory of transactive planning. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, O. (1972). The Amish of Canada. Waterloo, ON: Conrad Grebel College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, I. I. (1978). Oppression and social intervention. Chicago: Nelson­Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudzwaard, B., & de Lange, H. (1995). Beyond poverty and affluence. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell, S. U. (1969). An integrative process for urban and socio­technical problem­solving. Cleveland, OH: Engineering Design Center and Organizational Behavior Groups, Case Western Reserve University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. G. (1990). Changing contexts and the field of community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 769­792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, D. (1990). Great possessions: An Amish farmer's journal. New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneen, B. (1993). From land to mouth: Understanding the food system. Toronto, ON: NC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneen, B. (1999). Farmageddon: Food and the culture of biotechnology. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D. C. (1995). When corporations rule the world. San Francisco, CA: Berret­Koelher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraybill, D. B. (1989). The riddle of Amish culture. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart, A. (1987). Community­based development and conventional economics in the Canadian north. In E. M. Bennett (Ed.), Social intervention: Theory and practice (pp. 393­414). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. (1976). There's no better place than here: Social change in three Newfoundland communities. Toronto, ON: Peter Martin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. (1983). The creation of regional dependency. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobie, G. (1982). Small is possible. London: Sphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. (1997). Resource and environmental management. Essex, England: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M., & Suder, C. (1997). Cross­cultural psychology: The frustrated gadfly's promises, potentialities, and failures. In D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 185­201). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mornington Township. (1982). By­law 22­1982 of the Township of Mornington. Newton: Corporation of the Township of Mornington.

  • Ontario. (1997). Planning Act. Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario.

  • Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirages, D. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1974). Ark II: Social response to environmental imperatives. New York: The Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I. (1999). Critical psychology praxis. In M. Montero (Ed.), Psychology at the end of the century. Caracas: Interamerica Society of Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I. (2001). Value­based praxis in community psychology: Moving towards social justice and social action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 747­778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I., & Gonick, I. (1994). The discourse of oppression in the social sciences: Past, present, and future. In E. J. Trickett, R. J. Watts, & D. Birman (Eds.), Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context (pp. 145­177). San Francisco: Jossey­Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I., & Nelson, G. (1997). Community psychology: Reclaiming social justice. In D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 166­184). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, T. (1987). Fighting the farm crisis. Saskatoon, SK: Fifth House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1995). Empowerment meets narrative: Listening to stories and creating settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 795­807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, E., & Rapkin, B. (1983). Economics and psychosocial dysfunction: Toward a conceptual framework and prevention strategies. In R. D. Felner, L. A. Jason, J. N. Moritsugu, & S. S. Farber (Eds.), Preventive psychology: Theory, research and practice (pp. 175­198). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim, R. A. (1988). Land and community. Guelph, ON: Raithby House, University of Guelph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trachy, R. (1996, April 26). Her Majesty the Queen vs. Kuepfer and Wagler: Reasons for Judgement. Stratford, ON: Ontario Court of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R. J. (1992). Elements of a psychology of human diversity. Journal of Community Psychology, 20(2), 116­131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R. J., Griffith, D. M., & Abdul­Adil, J. (1999). Socio­political development as an antidote for oppression—theory and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(2), 255­271.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward M. Bennett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennett, E.M. Emancipatory Responses to Oppression: The Template of Land-Use Planning and the Old Order Amish of Ontario. Am J Community Psychol 31, 157–171 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023086923232

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023086923232

Navigation