Abstract
The purpose of this research was to develop a standardized content analytic measure of cognitive bias as conceptualized in Beck's (1987) cognitive theory of depression. In a pilot study it was determined that a written stimulus format was preferable to an audiotaped stimulus format with respect to comprehensibility. Valence and expectancy ratings collected in this pilot study also served as the basis for selection of items for the final measure, balancing positive and negative, expected and unexpected events. In study 2 open-ended written responses to questions about the main cause of each event, and the justifications for these attributions, were coded for indices of bias, defined (as in Cook & Peterson, 1986) as justifications that fail to cite covariation of the ascribed cause with the effect. Cognitive bias scores in Study 2 showed internal consistency (positive item-remainder correlations) and high interrater reliability. As predicted, justifications of attributions for expected events were more biased and less rational than were justifications of attributions for unexpected events.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bartko, J. J. (1976). On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 762-765.
Beck, A. T. (1987). Cognitive models of depression. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 1, 5-37.
Cook, M. L., & Peterson, C. (1986). Depressive irrationality. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, 293-298.
Davison, G. C., Vogel, R. S., & Coffman, S. G. (1997). Think-aloud approaches to cognitive assessment and the articulated thoughts in simulated situations paradigm. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 950-958.
Haaga, D. A. F. (1989). Articulated thoughts and endorsement procedures for cognitive assessment in the prediction of smoking relapse. Psychological Assessment, 1, 112-117.
Haaga, D. A. F., Dyck, M. J., & Ernst, D. (1991). Empirical status of cognitive theory of depression. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 215-236.
Kanazawa, S. (1992). Outcome or expectancy? Antecedent of spontaneous causal attribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 659-668.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
Lee, F., & Peterson, C. (1997). Content analysis of archival data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 959-969.
McAdams, D. P., & Zeldow, P. B. (1993). Construct validity and content analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 243-245.
McDermut, J. F., Haaga, D. A. F., & Bilek, L. A. (1997). Cognitive bias and irrational beliefs in major depression and dysphoria. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 459-476.
Smith, C. P. (Ed.) (1992). Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, T. W., O'Keeffe, J. L., & Christensen, A. J. (1994). Cognitive distortion and depression in chronic pain: Association with diagnosed disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 195-198.
Watkins, J. T., & Rush, A. J. (1983). Cognitive response test. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7, 425-436.
White, J., Davison, G. C., Haaga, D. A. F., & White, K. (1992). Cognitive bias in the articulated thoughts of depressed and nondepressed psychiatric patients. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180, 77-81.
Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hartman-Hall, H.M., Haaga, D.A.F. Content Analysis of Cognitive Bias: Development of a Standardized Measure. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy 17, 105–114 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023052931259
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023052931259