Skip to main content
Log in

The Contribution of Philosophy to Hazards Assessment and Decision Making

  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural hazards assessment, mitigation, research and decisionmaking in the field have not typically been associated with the discipline of philosophy. Nevertheless, there is growing awareness that epistemological issues (regarding the nature ofscientific knowledge, for instance) and ethical questions (for example, relating to responsibilitiesto future generations) can no longer be ignored. This paper explores how values and philosophicalassumptions affect the way that we formulate natural hazards research questions; the methodsthat we choose to examine natural hazards and mitigation schemes; and, ultimately, how weinterpret technical data. It concludes with the recommendation that human factors andqualitative methods of research can contribute in a meaningful way to advancing natural hazardsresearch and decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, P. A., Fisher, J. D., Baum, A., and Greene, T. E.: 1984, Environmental Psychology, 3rd edn, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., Fort Worth, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornemann Spies, K.: 1994, Earthquakes, Twenty-First Century Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunk, C., Haworth, L., and Lee, B.: 1991, Value Assumptions in Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the Alachlor Controversy, Wilfrid Laurier Press, Waterloo, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J.: 1990, First Peoples: A Future for the Indigenous World, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Institute of Planner: 1990, Reflections on Sustainable Planning, Canadian Institute of Planners, Ottawa, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cembalest, R.: 1991, The ecological art explosion, Artnews, Summer, 96–115.

  • Covello, V. T., Sandman, P. M., and Slovic, P.: 1991, Guidelines for communicating information about chemical risks effectively and responsibly, In: D. G. Mayo and R. D. Hollander (eds), Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 66–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, H.: 1966, The restoration of a sense of place: A theological reflection on the visual environment, Religious Education. Reprinted in: Ekistics, 1968, pp. 422–424.

  • Crabtree, B. F. and Miller, W. L. (eds): 1999, Doing Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W.: 1998, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, I.: 1978, Shelter After Disaster, Oxford Polytechnic Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloria, Jr., V.: 1995, Red Earth, White Lies: Native Americans and the Myth of Scientific Fact, Scribner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Des Jardins, J. R.: 1993, Environmental Ethics, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etkin, D.: 1999a, Risk transference and related trends: Driving forces toward more mega-disasters, Environmental Hazards 1, 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etkin, D.: 1999b, UNESCO Encyclopaedia, Natural disasters, draft, September 30.

  • Foot, D.: 1996, Boom, Bust and Echo: How to Profit from the Coming Demographic Shift, Macfarlane, Walter & Ross, Toronto, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, R. M.: 1999, Standards of qualitative research, In: B. Crabtree and W. L. Miller (eds), Doing Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 333–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frodeman, R.: 2000, Shifting plates: the new earth sciences, In: Frodeman, R. (ed), Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy and the Claims of Community, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. vii–xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R.: 1987, Environmental Psychology: Principles and Practice, Allyn and Bacon, Inc., MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M.: 1966, Memorial address, In: Discourse on Thinking, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMCC: 2001, The way ahead on a disaster mitigation strategy: Defining the scope of disaster mitigation, A discussion paper of the Interdepartmental Mitigation Working Group in Canada, January 25.

  • Impact Group: 2001, Science in the public interest: Values and ethics in the management, use and conduct of science at Environment Canada, draft, prepared for the Science Policy Branch, Environment Canada.

  • Kates, R. W.: 1976, Experiencing the environment as hazard, In: H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson, and L. G. Rivlin (eds), Environmental Psychology: People and Their Physical Settings, 2nd edn, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York, pp. 401–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavka, G., 1978: The futurity problem, In: R. I. Sikora and B. Brian (eds), Obligations to Future Generations, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovins, A.: 1991, Technology is the answer (but what was the question?), In: G. T. Miller (ed), Environmental Science, 3rd edn, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mileti, D. S.: 1999, Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States, Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Million, L.: 1992, It was home: A phenomenology of place and involuntary displacement as illustrated by the forced dislocation of five southern Alberta families in the Oldman River dam flood area, Ph.D. dissertation, Saybrook Institute, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. (ed): 1997, Completing a Qualitative Project: Details and Dialogue, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, O.: 1995, Suppose he threw it in your face, Introduction by A. McLeish, Selected Poetry of Ogden Nash, Black Dog & Leventhal, New York, p. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, J.: 1999, A comparative assessment between Canada and the United States: A discussion paper, Prepared for Evaluation and Analysis Directorate, Emergency Preparedness Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.

  • Pielke Jr., R., Klein, R., and Sarewitz, D.: 2000, Energy and Environment 11, 255–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz, D.: 1996, Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology and the Politics of Progress, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz, D.: 2000, Science and environmental policy: An excess of objectivity, In: R. Frodeman (ed), Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy and the Claims of Community, Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K.: 2000, Reading the riddle of nuclear waste: Idealized geological models and positivist epistemology, In: R. Frodeman (ed), Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy and the Claims of Community, Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K.: 1993, Burying Uncertainty: Risks and the Case Against Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste, University of California Press.

  • Shrader-Frechette, K.: 1991, Reductionist approaches to risk, In: D. G. Mayo and R. D. Hollander (eds), Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Assessment, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 218–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P.: 1991, Beyond numbers: A broader perspective on risk perception and risk communication, In: D. G. Mayo and R. D. Hollander (eds), Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 48–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, A. D.: 1996, Transgressing the boundaries: Towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity, Social Text 46/47 (Spring/Summer), 960–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solis, G. Y., Hightower, H. C., and Kawaguchi, J.: 1997, Guidelines on Cultural Diversity and Disaster Management, Final Report of the Disaster Preparedness Resources Centre, University of British Columbia, for Emergency Preparedness Canada (http://www.epcpcc. gc.ca/research/scie_tech/guid_cult.html)

  • Stefanovic, I. L.: 2000, Safeguarding Our Common Future: Rethinking Sustainable Development, State University of New York Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. J. and Bogdan, R.: 1998, Introduction to Qualitative Research Method, 3rd edn, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennekes, H.: 1994, The limits of science, In: W. Zweers and J. J. Boersema (eds), Ecology, Technology and Culture: Essays in Environmental Philosophy, The White Horse Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 72–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C.: 2000, Messages in stone: Field geology in the American West, In: Frodeman, R. (ed.), Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy and the Claims of Community, Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, J. (ed): 1997, Defending Mother Earth: Native American Perspectives on Environmental Justice, Orbis Books, Maryknoll, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stefanovic, I.L. The Contribution of Philosophy to Hazards Assessment and Decision Making. Natural Hazards 28, 229–247 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022965604958

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022965604958

Navigation