Skip to main content
Log in

Spin Gap Effects on Bulk R1+x ba2−x Cu3O7−δ (R=Eu or Nd and 0≤x≤0.4)

  • Published:
Journal of Superconductivity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spin gap effects on the underdoping states of the bulk system of R1+x Ba2−x Cu3O7−δ (R = Eu or Nd and 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.4) were investigated through transport property measurements. The underdoping states were achieved by, alternatively substituting R3+ for Ba2+ ions in the system rather than adjusting the oxygen deficiency. The excess R3+ ions were to occupy the Ba sites of the crystalline lattice as revealed from Rietveld analysis for powder X-ray diffraction. The underdoped materials were observed to first undergo spin pairing transition in the temperature range well above T c, and come across with superconducting transition at T c. The increasing feature observed for spin gap temperature and the decreasing one for T c, as the concentration of holes decreases, are in qualitatively good agreement with theoretical predictions from the mean-field RVB model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. P. W. Anderson, Science 235, 1196 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. G. Bednorz and K. A. Muller, Z. Phys. B 64, 189 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. K. Wu, J. R. Ashburn, C. T. Torng, P. H. Hor, R. L. Meng, L. Gao, Z. J. Huang, Y. Q. Wang, and C. W. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 908 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Nagaosa and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 45, 966 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. J. Emery and S. A. Kivelson, Nature 374, 433 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. W. Warren Jr., R. E. Walstedt, G. F. Brennert, R. J. Cava, R. Tycho, R. F. Bell, and G. Dabbagh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1193 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Matsumura, Y. Sakamoto, T. Fushihara, Y. Itoh, and H. Yamagata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 64, 721 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Yasuoda, T. Imai, and T. Shimizu, in Strong Correlation and Superconductivity, H. Fukuyama, S. Maekawa, and A. P. Malozemoff, eds. (Springer, Berlin, 1989), p. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Rossat-Mignod, L. P. Regnault, C. Vettier, P. Bourges, P. Burlet, J. Bossy, J. Y. Henry, and G. Lapertot, Physica C 185–189, 86 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Tranquada, P. M. Gehring, and G. Shirane, Phys. Rev. B 46, 5561 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Ding, T. Yokoya, J. C. Campuzano, T. Takahashi, M. Randeria, M. R. Norman, T. Mochiku, K. Kadowaki, and J. Giapintzakis, Nature 382, 51 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. G. Loeser, Z. X. Shen, D. S. Dessau, D. S. Marshall, C. H. Park, P. Fournier, and A. Kapitulnik, Science 273, 325 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Ito, K. Takenaka, and S. Uchida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3995 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Takenaka, K. Mizuhashi, H. Takagi, and S. Uchida, Phys. Rev. B 50, 6534 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Bucher, P. Steiner, J. Karpinski, E. Kaldis, and P. Wachter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 20212 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Rietveld Method, R. Y. Young, ed. (International Union of Crys., Oxford Univ. Press, 1993).

  17. C. W. Chu, Z. J. Huang, R. L. Meng, L. Gao, and P. H. Hor, Phys. Rev. B 37, 9730 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. François, J. Genoe, and G. Borghs, Phys. Rev. B 54, 3066 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Shked, B. W. Veal, J. Faber Jr., R. L. Hitterman, U. Balachandran, G. Tomlins, H. Shi, L. Morss, and A. P. Paulikas, Phys. Rev. B 41, 4173 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  20. X. G. Wen and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 503 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

You, C.Y., Chien, F.Z. & Guan, W. Spin Gap Effects on Bulk R1+x ba2−x Cu3O7−δ (R=Eu or Nd and 0≤x≤0.4). Journal of Superconductivity 11, 693–698 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022628820401

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022628820401

Navigation