Skip to main content
Log in

Rationality, biology and optimality*

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A historical theory of rational norms claims that, if we are supposed to think rationally, this is because it is biologically normal for us to do so. The historical theorist is committed to the view that we are supposed to think rationally only if, in the past, adult humans sometimes thought rationally. I consider whether there is any plausible model of rational norms that can be adopted by the historical theorist that is compatible with the claim that adult human beings are subject to rational norms, given certain plausible empirical assumptions about our history and capabilities. I suggest that there is one such model: this model centres on the idea that a procedure is rational if it has been endorsed (or at least not rejected) by mechanisms that have the function to ensure that the subject learns to reason in a way that approaches a certain kind of optimality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams P. 2001. 'Adaptationism: Models and Scenarios'. In: Orzack S. and Sober E. (eds), pp. 273-302.

  • Anderson J. 1991. 'Is Human Cognition Adaptive?'. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 14: 471–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng P., Holyoak K., Nisbett R. and Oliver L. 1986. 'Pragmatic Versus Syntactic Approaches to Training Deductive Reasoning'. Cognitive Psychology 18: 293–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherniak C. 1986. Minimal Rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A. 1987. 'The Kludge in the Machine'. Mind and Language 2: 277–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen L.J. 1981. 'Can Human Irrationality Be Experimentally Demonstrated?'. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 4: 317–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D. 1987. 'Making Sense of Ourselves'. In: Dennett D. (ed.), The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass, pp. 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske F. 1988. Explaining Behaviour: Reasons in a World of Causes. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske F. 1995. Naturalizing the Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré J. (ed.) 1987. The Latest on the Best. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen J.M. 1987. 'Evolutionary Ecology and the Optimality Assumption'. In: Dupré J. (ed.), pp. 163-177.

  • Eshel I. and Feldman M.W. 2001. 'Optimality and Evolutionary Stability'. In: Orzack S. and Sober E. (eds), pp. 161-190.

  • Evans J. and Over D. 1996. Rationality and Reasoning. Psychology Press, Hove, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong G., Kranzt D. and Nisbett R. 1986. 'The Effects of Statistical Training On Thinking About Everyday Problems'. Cognitive Psychology 18: 253–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G. 1996. 'On Narrow Norms and Vague Heuristics: A Reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996)'. Psychological Review 103: 592–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G. and Todd P. 1999. 'Fast and Frugal Heuristics: The Adaptive Toolbox'. In: Gigerenzer G. and Todd P. et al. (eds), Simple Heuristics That make Us Smart. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist G. and Kingsolver J.G. 2001. 'Is Optimality over the Hill'. In: Orzack S. and Sober E. (eds), pp. 219-241.

  • Goodman N. 1983. Fact Fiction and Forecast. 4th edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D. and Tversky K. 1996. 'On the Reality of Cognitive Illusions'. Psychological Review 103: 582–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P. 1987. 'Why Not the Best?'. In: Dupré J. (ed.), pp. 77-102.

  • Lewontin R. 1987. 'The Shape of Optimality'. In: Dupré J. (ed.), pp. 151-159.

  • Lycan W. 1981. '“Is” and “Ought” in Cognitive Science'. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 4: 344–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manktelow K. and Over D. 1987. 'Reasoning and Rationality'. Mind and Language 2: 199–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan R. 1984a. Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan R. 1984b. 'Naturalist Reflections on Knowledge'. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65: 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan R. 1989. 'In Defence of Proper Functions'. Philosophy of Science 56: 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neander K. 1995. 'Misrepresenting and Malfunctioning'. Philosophical Studies 79: 109–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick R. 1993. The Nature of Rationality. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford M. and Chater N. 1994. 'A Rational Analysis of the Selection Task as Optimal Data Selection'. Psychological Review 101: 608–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orzack S. and Sober E. (eds) 2001. Adaptationism and Optimality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau D. 1993. Philosophical Naturalism. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C. 2001. Functions in Mind: A Theory of Intentional Content. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N. 1988. Rationality. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. 1956. 'Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment'. Psychological Review 63: 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. 1972. 'Theories of Bounded Rationality'. In: Radner C. and Radner R. (eds), Decision and Organization. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith E.A. 1987. 'Optimization Theory in Anthropology: Applications and Critiques'. In: Dupré J. (ed.), pp. 201-249.

  • Sober E. 1981. 'The Evolution of Rationality'. Synthese 46: 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein E. 1996. Without Good Reason: The Rationality Debate in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich S. 1990. The Fragmentation of Reason. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich S. and Nisbett R. 1980. 'Justification and the Psychology of Human Reasoning'. Philosophy of Science 47: 188–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S.E. 1989. Positive Illusions: Creative Self-Deception and the Healthy Mind. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A. and Kahneman D. 1973. 'On the Psychology of Prediction'. Psychological Review 80: 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A. and Kahneman D. 1983. 'Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgement'. Psychological Review 90: 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wason P. 1968. 'Reasoning About A Rule'. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20: 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Price, C. Rationality, biology and optimality*. Biology & Philosophy 17, 613–634 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022556019609

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022556019609

Navigation