Skip to main content
Log in

Limited Proteolysis of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIG and CryIVB δ-Endotoxins Leads to Formation of Active Fragments That Do Not Coincide with the Structural Domains

  • Published:
Journal of Protein Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bacillus thuringiensis “true” toxins consist of three domains: the N-terminal, α-helical domain followed by two β-structural domains. Their limited proteolysis does not proceed at the domain boundaries, but is directed to the loops within the domains. There are at least two patterns of the limited proteolysis of “true” toxins. The first pattern, observed for CryIA and CryIVD δ-endotoxins, results in the proteolysis of the loops connecting β-strands of the second domain. The second pattern, detected for CryIG and CryIVB proteins, consists in the cleavage of the loop connecting the fifth and the sixth α-helixes of the first domain. The choice between the routes depends on the size, sequence, and dynamics of the loop that define its accessibility to a proteinase. Bioassay of CryIG and CryIVB δ-endotoxin fragments indicates that only two α-helixes, the sixth and the seventh within the first domain, followed by the two β-structural domains are sufficient for the insecticidal activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zalunin, I.A., Revina, L.P., Kostina, L.I. et al. Limited Proteolysis of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIG and CryIVB δ-Endotoxins Leads to Formation of Active Fragments That Do Not Coincide with the Structural Domains. J Protein Chem 17, 463–471 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022522602400

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022522602400

Navigation