Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Magnetic basement in the central Bay of Bengal

  • Published:
Marine Geophysical Researches Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analyses of about 6000 km of processed magnetic data in the central Bay of Bengal using Analytical Signal Processing and Werner Deconvolution techniques revealed that the depth to top of the magnetic basement varies between 5 and 12 km from the sea surface, where the water column thickness is about 3.4 km. These inferred depths are comparable to the reported acoustic basement depths. The basement map derived from magnetic interpretation defines the general configuration of the central Bay of Bengal. The N10–12° W trending subsurface 85° E Ridge buried under 2 to 3 km thick sediments is a prominent tectonic feature. Offshore basins characterised by deeper magnetic basement (∼ 9 km) and 100–200 km wide are present on either sides of the ridge. These basins were filled with 6–8 km thick lower Cretaceous to recent sediments. Integrated geophysical study depicts that the magnetic basement is characterised by NW-SE, NE-SW, NNE-SSW, N10-12° W and E-W trending structural features that are associated with the lower Cretaceous ocean floor. The Analytical Signal Processing and Werner Deconvolution techniques proved to be effective in determining the depth to the basement in areas covered by thick sediment overburden and characterized by a complex geologic/tectonic framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atchuta Rao, D., Ram Babu, H. V. and Sanker Narayan, P. V., 1981, Interpretation of magnetic anomalies due to dikes: The complex gradient method. Geophysics 46, 1572-1578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, R. J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications, Cambridge University Press, 441 pp.

  • Brune, J. N. and Singh, D. D. 1986, Continent-like crustal thickness beneath the Bay of Bengal sediments. Seismological Society of America Bulletin 76, 191-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D. J. T., 1980, Echosounding correction tables (formerly Mathew's tables), Hydrographic Department, Ministry of Defence, Taunton, 150 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curray, J. R., 1994, Sediment volume and mass beneath the Bay of Bengal. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 125, 371-383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curray, J. R., Emmel, F. J., Moore, D. G., and Russel, W. R., 1982, Structure, tectonics and geological history of the Northeastern Indian Ocean. In: A. E. Nairn and F. G. Stehli (Editors), The Ocean Basins and Margins: The Indian Ocean. Plenum, New York, 6, 399-450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. A., 1991. Age distribution of volcanism along aseismic ridges in the eastern Indian Ocean. Proc. ODP, Sci. Results, College Station, Texas, Ocean Drilling Program 121, 507-517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. A. and Storey, M., 1992, The life cycle of Indian Ocean hotspots. In: R. A. Duncan et al. (eds.), Synthesis of Results from scientific drilling in the Indian Ocean. Geophys. Monogr. Ser. AGU, Washington, D.C., 70, pp. 91-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. L., Jantsch, M. J. and Comer, R. L., 1982, General Bathymetric chart of the Oceans (GEBCO), Canadian Hydrographic Service, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gansser, A., 1981, The Geodynamic history of the Himalaya. In: H. K. Gupta and F. M. Delany (eds.), Zagros Hindukush, Himalaya, Geodynamic Evolution, Am. Geophy. Union. Geodyn. Sem., 3, pp. 11-121.

  • Hartman, R. R, Teskey, D. J., Friedberg, J. L., 1971, A system for rapid digital aeromagnetic interpretation. Geophysics 36, 891-918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjelt, S. E., 1973, Experiences with automatic magnetic interpretation using the thick plate model. Geophys. Prosp. 21, 243-265.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAGA Division, V. Working group 8, 1995, International Geomagnetic Reference Field, 1995 Revision, adopted at XXI general assembly of International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) held in Boulder, Colorado.

  • Johnson, W. W., 1969, A least squares method of interpreting magnetic anomalies caused by two-dimensional structures. Geophysics 34, 65-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klootwijik, J., Gee, J. W., Peirce, G. H., Smith, P. L. and Faddam, M. C., 1992, An early India Asia Contact, Paleomagnetic constraints from Ninetyeast ridge, O.D.P leg 121. Geology 20, 395-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, K. S., Gopala Rao, D., Ramana, M. V., Subrahmanyam, V., Sarma, K. V. L. N. S., Pilipenko, A. I., Shcherbakov, V. S. and Radhakrishna Murthy, I. V., 1995, Tectonic model for the evolution of oceanic crust in the northeastern Indian Ocean from the Late Cretaceous to the Early Tertiary. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 20,011-20,024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, K. S., Ramana, M. V., Gopala Rao, D., Murthy, K. S. R., Malleswara Rao, M.M., Subrahmanyam, V. and Sarma, K. V. L. N. S., 1998, Periodic deformation of oceanic crust in the Central Indian Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 17,859-17,875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ku, C. C., 1976, Numerical inverse magneto telluric problems. Geophysics 41, 276-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ku, C. C. and Sharp, J. A., 1983, Werner Deconvolution for automated magnetic interpretation and its refinement using Marquardt's inversed modeling. Geophysics 48, 754-774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. S., Curray, J. R. and McDonald, J. M., 1983, New constraints on the tectonic evolution of eastern Indian Ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 65, 331-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maria Desa, M. V. Ramana and T. Ramprasad, 2001, Seafloor spreading magnetic anomalies Southeast of Sri Lanka, 38th Annual Convention of Indian Geophysical Union, 18-20, December 2001, held at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India, abstract, p. 47.

  • McGrath, P. H. and Hood, P. J., 1973, An automatic least-squares multi-model method of magnetic interpretation. Geophysics 38, 348-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, D. P. and Sclater, J. G., 1971, The evolution of the Indian Ocean since the Late Cretaceous. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 25, 437-528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay M. and Krishna M. R., 1991, Gravity field and deep structure of the Bengal Fan and its surrounding continental margins, northeastern Indian. Tectonophysics 186, 365-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabighian, M. N., 1972, The analytical signal of two dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross section, its properties and use for automated anomaly Interpretation. Geophysics 37, 507-517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabighian, M. N., 1974, Additional comments on the analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal crosssection. Geophysics 39, 85-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, I. O. and Sclater, J. G., 1979, A model for the evolution of the Indian Ocean and the break up of Gondwana land. J. Geophy. Res. 84, 6803-6830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateria, M. L., Rangaraju, M. K. and Raiverman, V., 1992, A note on the structure and stratigraphy of Bay of Bengal sediments. In: Recent Geoscientific Studies in the Bay of Bengal and the Andaman Sea, Spec. Publ. Ser. Geol. Surv. India 29, 21-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patriat, P. and Achache, J., 1984, India Eurasia Collision chronology has implications for crustal shortening and driving mechanism for plates. Nature 311, 615-621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patriat, P. and Segoufin, J., 1988, Reconstruction of the central Indian Ocean. Tectonophysics 155, 211-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, C. McA., Roots, S. R. and Veevers, J. J., 1988, Prebreakup continental extension in east Gondwanaland and the early opening of the eastern Indian Ocean. Tectonophysics 155, 261-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramana, M. V., Nair, R. R., Sarma, K. V. L. N. S., Ramprasad, T., Krishna, K. S., Subrahmanyam, V., Maria D'Cruz., Subrahmanyam, C., John Paul, Subrahmanyam, A. S. and Chandra Sekhar, D. V., 1994, Mesozoic magnetic anomalies in the Bay of Bengal. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 121, 469-475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramana, M. V., Subrahmanyam, V., Sarma, K. V. L. N. S., Maria Desa, Malleswara Rao, M. M. and Subrahmanyam, C., 1997a, Record of the Cretaceous magnetic quiet zone A precursor to the understanding of Evolutionary history of the Bay of Bengal. Curr. Sci. 72, 669-673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramana, M. V., Subrahmanyam, V., Chaubey, A. K., Ramprasad, T., Sarma, K. V. L. N. S., Krishna, K. S., Maria Desa. and Murty, G. P. S., 1997b, Structure and origin of the 85 E Ridge. J. Geophys. Res. 120, 17995-18012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramana, M. V. and Ramprasad, T., 2000, Need to define deep crustal structure of the Bay of Bengal a major constituent of the north-eastern Indian Ocean. Curr. Sci. 78, 1408-1409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramana, M. V., Krishna, K. S., Ramprasad, T., Maria Desa, Subrahmanyam, V and Sarma, K. V. L. N. S., 2001b, Structure and tectonic evolution of the Northeastern Indian Ocean, In: R. Sengupta and Ehrlich Desa (eds.), The Indian Ocean-a perspective, Vol. 2, 731-816.

  • Ramana, M. V., Ramprasad, T. and Desa, M., 2001, Seafloor spreading magnetic anomalies in the Enderby Basin, East Antarctica. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 191, 223-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. C. S. and Rao, V., 1986, Some structural features of Bengal. Tectonophysics 124, 141-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, D. G., Bhattacharya, G. C., Ramana, M. V., Subrahmanyam.,V. Ramprasad, T., Krishna, K. S., Chaubey, A. K., Murty, G. P. S., Srinivas, K., Desa, M., Reddy, S. I., Ashalatha, B., Subrahmanyam, C., Mittal, G. S., Drolia, R. K., Rai, S. K., Ghosh, S. K., Singh, R. N. and Majumdar, R., 1994, Analysis of multi channel seismic reflection and magnetic data along 13 N Latitude across the Bay of Bengal. Mar. Geophy. Res. 16, 225-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roest, W. R., Verhoef, J. and Pilkington, M., 1992, Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal. Geophysics 57, 116-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, J-Y, Sclater, J. G. and Sandwell, D. T., 1989, A preliminary tectonic chart of the Indian Ocean. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., (Earth Planet. Sci.) 98, 7-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, J.-Y., Sclater, J. G., Sandwell, D. T., Cande, S. C., Schlich, R., Munschy, M., Dyment, J., Fisher, R. L., Muller, R. D., Coffin, M. F., Patriat, Ph. and Bergh, H. W., 1992, Indian Ocean plate reconstructions since the Late Jurassic. In: R.A. Duncan et al., (eds.), Synthesis of Results from Scientific Drilling in the Indian Ocean. Geophys. Monogr. Ser., AGU, Washington, D.C., 70, pp. 471-475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandwell, D. T. and Smith, W. H. F., 1997, Marine gravity anomaly from GEOSAT and ERS-1satellite altimetry. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 10039-10054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlich, R., 1982. The Indian Ocean, aseismic ridges, spreading centers and basins. In:, A. E. Nairn and F. G. Stehli (eds.), The Ocean Basins and Margins: The Indian Ocean. Plenum, New York, 6, pp. 51-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam, V., Ramana, M. V., Subrahmanyam, C., Krishna, K. S., Sarma, K. V. L. N. S., Desa, M., and Lakhminarayana, S., 1995, Gravity studies in the Bay of Bengal. 32nd Ann. Con. and Sem. on Mar. Geophy. Held at Hyderabad, 19-21 Dec. 1995, Extended abstracts, 8pp.

  • Weis, D., and Frey, F. A., 1991, Isotope geochemistry of Ninetyeast Ridge basement basalts: SR, ND, and PB evidence for involvement of the Kerguelen hotspot, Proc. ODP, Sci. Results, College Station, Texas, Ocean Drilling Program 121, 591-610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, D., Frey, F. A., Saunders, A., Gibson, I. and Leg 121 Scientific Shipboard party, 1991, Ninetyeast Ridge (Indian Ocean): A 5000 km record of a Duple mantle plume, Geology 19, 99-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, S., 1953, Interpretation of magnetic anomalies at sheet-like bodies. Sveriges Geol. Unders., Ser. C., Arsbok, 43, 6, 130 pp.

  • Wessel, P. and Smith, W. H. F., 1998, New improved version of Generic Mapping Tools released. EOS Trans. AGU 79, 579.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Regional Center, National Institute of Oceanography, 176, Lawson's Bay Colony, Visakhapatnam, 530017, India

    K.V.L.N.S. Sarma & M.M. Malleswara Rao

  2. National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa, 403004, India

    M.V. Ramana, T. Ramprasad, Maria Desa, V. Subrahmanyam & K.S. Krishna

Authors
  1. K.V.L.N.S. Sarma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M.V. Ramana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Ramprasad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria Desa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. V. Subrahmanyam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. K.S. Krishna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M.M. Malleswara Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.V. Ramana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarma, K., Ramana, M., Ramprasad, T. et al. Magnetic basement in the central Bay of Bengal. Marine Geophysical Researches 23, 97–108 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022491030001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022491030001

Search

Navigation