Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of Swab and Related Tests as a Bioassay for Assessing Responses by Squamate Reptiles to Chemical Stimuli

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability of squamates to detect chemical cues from adaptively important sources including prey, predators, and conspecifics has been tested frequently by presenting stimuli on cotton-tipped swabs or ceramic tiles. In many such studies the primary response variable is tongue-flicking, which is widely interpreted to indicate sampling for vomerolfaction. I review the basic experimental method and consider limitations regarding its application and interpretation and ways to overcome them. Effects of experimenter proximity and the assumed invisibility of chemical stimuli are considered, as are use of cologne as a pungency control, senses used in making chemical discriminations, and interpretation of results when there are no significant response differences among stimulus classes. Although the assumption that tongue-flicking reveals vomerolfactory sampling and the necessity of an intact vomeronasal system for normal responses to pheromones have been demonstrated where tested, very few species have been examined. In some squamates for which these assumptions have not been examined experimentally, especially eublepharid geckos, attacks on swabs bearing prey chemicals and performance of antipredatory displays in response to predator chemicals occur with no prior tongue-flicking. Not only are assays based on tongue-flicking useless in such cases, but the discriminations are likely based on olfaction. Issues specific to the study of responses to prey chemicals, predator chemicals, and pheromones are discussed. For many purposes, swab tests provide rapid, conclusive assays of ability to respond differentially to biologically relevant stimuli. However, other methods may be superior for studying some responses, and swab tests are not always applicable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alberts, A. C. 1989. Ultraviolet visual sensitivity in desert iguana: Implications for pheromone detection. Anim. Behav. 38:129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberts, A. C. 1992. Pheromonal self-recognition in desert iguanas. Copeia 1992:229–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S. J. 1978. Some effects of early experience on feeding responses in the common garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis. Anim. Behav. 26:455–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S. J. 1981. Behavioral variation in natural populations. I. Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental correlations between chemoreceptive responses to prey in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 35:489–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brillet, C. 1990. Roles des informations olfactives et visuelles dans le discrimination du sexe chez deux especies de geckos nocturnes: Eublepharis macularius et Paroedura pictus. Biol. Behav. 15:1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M. 1967. Chemical-cue preferences of inexperienced snakes: comparative aspects. Science 157:718–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M. 1969. Comparative prey-attack studies in newborn snakes of the genus Thamnophis. Behaviour 33:77–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M. 1970a. Chemical perception in reptiles, pp. 241–308, in J. W. Johnston, D. G. Moulton, and A. Turk (eds.). Advances in Chemoreception, Vol. I. Communication by Chemical Signals. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M. 1970b. Intraspecific geographical variation in chemical food cue preferences of newborn garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis). Behaviour 36:246–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M. 1973. Chemical release of prey attack: Extension to naive newly hatched lizards, Eumeces fasciatus. Copeia 1973:178–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M. 1975. Sensory cues and feeding behavior of snakes, pp. 30–33, in E. O. Price and A. W. Stokes (eds.). Animal Behavior in Laboratory and Field, 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M. 1978. Behavioral ontogeny in reptiles: Whence, whither, and why? pp. 149–174, in G. M. Burghardt and M. Bekoff (eds.). The Development of Behavior: Comparative and Evolutionary Aspects. Garland STPM Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M. 1980. Behavioral and stimulus correlates of vomeronasal functioning in reptiles: Feeding, grouping, sex, and tongue use, pp. 275–301, in D. Müller-Schwarze and R. M. Silverstein (eds.). Chemical Signals: Vertebrates and Aquatic Invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M. 1992. Prior exposure to prey cues influences chemical prey preference and prey choice in neonatal garter snakes. Anim. Behav. 44:787–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M., Wilcoxon, H. C., and Czaplicki, J. A. 1973. Conditioning in garter snakes: Aversion to palatable prey induced by delayed illness. Anim. Learn. Behav. 1:317–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiszar, D., and Scudder, K. M. 1980. Chemosensory searching by rattlesnakes during predatory episodes, pp. 125–139, in D. Müller-Schwarze and R. M. Silverstein (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates and Aquatic Invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1981. Visual guidance of predatory attack by a scincid lizard, Eumeces laticeps. Anim. Behav. 29:1127–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1989a. Absence of prey odor discrimination by iguanid and agamid lizards in applicator tests. Copeia 1989:472–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1989b. Prey odor discrimination in the varanoid lizards Heloderma suspectum and Varanus exanthematicus. Ethology 81:250–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1990a. Chemical detection of predators by a lizard, the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps). J. Exp. Zool. 256:162–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1990b. Prey odor detection by teiid and lacertid lizards and the relationship of prey odor detection to foraging mode in lizard families. Copeia 1990:237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1990c. Prey odor discrimination by anguid lizards. Herpetologica 46:183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1991a. Responses to prey chemicals by a lacertid lizard, Podarcis muralis: Prey chemical discrimination and poststrike elevation in tongue-flick rate. J. Chem. Ecol. 17:849–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1991b. Discrimination of integumentary prey chemicals and strike-induced chemosensory searching in the ball phython, Python regius. J. Ethol. 9:9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1992a. Elevation in tongue-flick rate after biting prey in the broad-headed skink, Eumeces laticeps. J. Chem. Ecol. 18:455–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1992b. Prey odor discrimination and post-strike elevation in tongue flicking by a cordylid lizard, Gerrhosaurus nigrolineatus. Copeia 1992:146–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1994a. Multiple functions of extraoral lingual behavior in iguanian lizards: Prey capture, grooming, and swallowing, but not prey detection. Anim. Behav. 47:765–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1994b. Chemical discrimination by tongue-flicking in lizards: A review with hypotheses on its origin and its ecological and phylogenetic relationships. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:439–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1994c. Prey chemical discrimination, foraging mode, and phylogeny, pp. 95–116, in L. J. Vitt and E. R. Pianka (eds.). Lizard Ecology: Historical and Experimental Perspectives. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1995a. Foraging mode, prey chemical discrimination, and phylogeny in lizards. Anim. Behav. 50:973–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1995b. Prey chemical discrimination and foraging mode in gekkonoid lizards. Herpetol. Monogr. 9:120–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1996a. Preliminary reconstructions of nasal chemosensory evolution in Squamata. Amphibia-Reptilia 17:395–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1996b. Chemosensory recognition of familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by the scincid lizard Eumeces laticeps. Ethology 102:454–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and Alberts, A. C. 1990. Responses to chemical food stimuli by an herbivorous actively foraging lizard, Dipsosaurus dorsalis. Herpetologica 46:259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and Alberts, A. C. 1991. Tongue-flicking and biting in response to chemical food stimuli by an iguanid lizard (Dipsosaurus dorsalis) having sealed vomeronasal ducts: Vomerolfaction may mediate these behavioral responses. J. Chem. Ecol. 17:135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and Burghardt, G. M. 1990. A comparative analysis of scoring methods for chemical discrimination of prey by squamate reptiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and Deperno, C. S. 1993. Prey chemical discrimination and strike-induced chemosensory searching in the lizard Liolaemus zapallarensis. Chemoecology 4:86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and Steele, L. J. 1997. Pheromonal discrimination of sex by male and female leopard geckos (Eublepharis macularius). J. Chem. Ecol. 23:2967–2977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and Trauth, S. E. 1992. Discrimination of conspecific male and female cloacal chemical stimuli by males and possession of a probable pheromone gland by females in a cordylid lizard, Gerrhosaurus nigrolineatus. Herpetologica 48:229–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and VAN Wyk, J. H.. 1994. Absence of prey chemical discrimination by tongue-flicking in an ambush-foraging lizard having actively foraging ancestors. Ethology 97:317–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and Vitt, L. J. 1984a. Conspecific odor detection by the male broad-headed skink, Eumeces laticeps: Effects of sex and site of odor source and of male reproductive condition. J. Exp. Zool. 230:199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and Vitt, L. J. 1984b. Detection of conspecific odors by the female broad-headed skink, Eumeces laticeps. J. Exp. Zool. 229:49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and Vitt, L. J. 1986a. Interspecific odour discriminations among synoptic congeners in scincid lizards (genus Eumeces). Behaviour 97:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and Vitt, L. J. 1986b. Lizard pheromones: Behavioral responses and adaptive significance in skinks of the genus Eumeces, pp. 323–340, in D. Duvall, D. Müller-Schwarze, and R. M. Silverstein (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 4. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and Vitt, L. J. 1986c. Tracking of female conspecific odor trails by male broad-headed skinks (Eumeces laticeps). Ethology 71:242–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and Vitt, L. J. 1987. Intraspecific and interspecific aggression in lizards of the scincid genus Eumeces: Chemical detection of conspecific sexual competitors. Herpetologica 43:7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., and Vitt, L. J. 1989. Prey odor discrimination by the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps). J. Exp. Zool. 249:11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., Garstka, W. R., and Vitt, L. J. 1986. Female sex pheromone in the lizard Eumeces laticeps. Herpetologica 42:361–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., Buth, D. G., and Vitt, L. J. 1990. Prey odor discrimination by ingestively naive coachwhip snakes (Masticophis flagellum). Chemoecology 1:86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., Deperno, C. S., and Steele, L. J. 1996a. Do lingual behaviors and locomotion by two gekkotan lizards after experimental loss of bitten prey indicate chemosensory search? Amphibia-Reptilia 17:217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., van Wyk, J. H., and Mouton, P. L. F. N. 1996b. Pheromonal detection and sex discrimination of conspecific substrate deposits by the rock-dwelling cordylid lizard Cordylus cordylus. Copeia 1996:839–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., Deperno, C. S., and Fox, S. F. 1996c. Prey chemical discrimination and strike-induced chemosensory searching in lizards: Their absence in a crotaphytid lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and a proposal for research in zoos. Zoo Biol. 15:239–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. E., Jr., Lemos-Espinal, J. A., and Smith, G. R. 1998. Presence and effect of defensiveness or context on detectability of prey chemical discrimination in the lizard Xenosaurus platyceps. Herpetologica. In press.

  • Cowles, R. B., and Phelan, R. L. 1958. Olfaction in rattlesnakes. Copeia 1958:77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defazio, A., Simon, C. A., Middendorf, G. A., and Romano, D. 1977. Iguanid substrate licking: A response to novel situations in Sceloporus jarovi. Copeia 1977:706–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deperno, C. S., and Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1996. Labial-licking for chemical sampling by the leopard gecko Eublepharis macularius. J. Herpetol. 30:540–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dial, B. E. 1990. Predator-prey signals: Chemosensory identification of snake predators by eublepharid lizards and its ecological consequences, pp. 555–565, in D. W. Macdonald, D. Müller-Schwarze, and S. E. Natynczuk (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 5. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dial, B. E., and Schwenk, K. 1996. Olfaction and predator detection in Coleonyx brevis (Squamata: Eublepharidae), with comments on the functional significance of buccal pulsing in geckos. J. Exp. Zool. 27:415–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dial, B. E., Weldon, P. J., and Curtis, B. 1989. Chemosensory identification of snake predators (Phyllorhynchus decurtatus) by banded geckos (Coleonyx variegatus). J. Herpetol. 23:224–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvall, D. 1981. Western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis) chemical discriminations. II. A replication with naturally breeding adults and a test of the Cowles and Phelan hypothesis of rattlesnake olfaction. J. Exp. Zool. 218:351–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvall, D., Graves, B. M., and Carpenter, G. C. 1987. Visual and chemical composite signalling effects of Sceloporus lizard fecal boli. Copeia 1987:1028–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, L. J., Loew, E. R., and Leal, M. 1993. Ultraviolet vision in lizards. Nature 365:397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, J. L., and Burghardt, G. M. 1971. Effects of early feeding experience on the responses of garter snakes to food chemicals. Learn. Motiv. 2:271-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabe, M., and Saint Girons, H. 1976. Contribution a la morphologie comparée des fosses nasales et de leurs annexes chez les lepidosauriens. Mem. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., Nouv. Ser. A 98:1-87 + 49 figs, 10 pl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, J. C., and Clark, D. L. 1981. Snake tongue-flicking: Transfer mechanics to Jacobson's organ. Can. J. Zool. 59:1651-1657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, D. 1979. A comparative study of snake and lizard tongue-flicking, with an evolutionary hypothesis. Z. Tierpsychol. 51:58-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, D., and Burghardt, G. M. 1983. Context-correlated parameters of snake and lizard tongue-flicking. Anim. Behav. 31:718-723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, B. M., and Halpern, M. 1989. Chemical access to the vomeronasal organs of the lizard Chalcides ocellatus. J. Exp. Zool. 249:150-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, B. M., and Halpern, M. 1990. Roles of vomeronasal chemoreception in tongue flicking, exploratory and feeding behaviour of the lizard, Chalcides ocellatus. Anim. Behav. 39:692-698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, A. E. 1985. Facial tongue-wiping in xantusiid lizards: Its systematic implications. J. Herpetol. 19:174-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, M. 1983. Nasal chemical senses in snakes, pp. 141-176, in J. P. Ewert, R. R. Capranica, and D. J. Ingle (eds.). Advances in Vertebrate Neuroethology. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, M. 1992. Nasal chemical senses in reptiles: structure and function, pp. 423-523, in C. Gans and D. Crews (eds.). Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 18, Brain, Hormones, and Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, M., and Frumin, N. 1979. Roles of the vomeronasal and olfactory systems in prey attack and feeding in adult garter snakes. Physiol. Behav. 22:1183-1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschenbaum, D. M., Schulman, N., and Halpern, M. 1986. Earthworms produce a collagen-like substance detected by the garter snake vomeronasal system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83:1213-1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, S. H., Wang, J. J., Huang, S. C., Chao, C. F., and Chen, C. C. 1991. Ultrastructure of the tongue and anterior process of the sublingual plica in four species of venomous snakes. J. Morphol. 208:279-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. T. 1992. Reptilian pheromones, pp. 114-228, in C. Gans and D. Crews (eds.). Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 18, Brain, Hormones, and Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, R. 1955. Die Amphibien und Reptilien Südwestafrikas. Abh. Senck. Naturforsch. Ges. 490:1-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgans, L. F., and Heidt, G. A. 1978. Comparative tongue histology and scanning electron microscopy of the diamondback water snake (Natrix rhombifera) and black rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta) (Reptilia, Serpentes, Colubridae). J. Herpetol. 12:275-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletto, P. F. 1985. The relative roles of vision and olfaction in prey detection by the ground skink, Scincella lateralis. J. Herpetol. 19:411-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. A., and Alberts, A. C. 1992. Naive ophiophagous lizards recognize and avoid venomous snakes using chemical cues. J. Chem. Ecol. 18:1775-1783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitman, C. R. S. 1974. A Guide to the Snakes of Uganda, rev. ed. Wheldon and Wesley, Codicote.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reformato, L. S., Kirschenbaum, D. M., and Halpern, M. 1983. Preliminary characterization of response-eliciting components of earthworm extract. Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 18:247-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwenk, K. 1985. Occurrence, distribution, and functional significance of taste buds in lizards. Copeia 1985:91-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwenk, K. 1993. Are geckos olfactory specialists? J. Zool. Soc. London 223:289-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoji, T., and Kurihara, K. 1991. Sensitivity and transduction mechanisms of responses to general odorants in turtle vomeronasal system. J. Gen. Physiol. 98:909-919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, C. A. 1983. A review of lizard chemoreception, pp. 119-133, in R. B. Huey, E. R. Pianka, and T. W. Schoener (eds.). Lizard Ecology: Studies of a Model Organison. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, L. J., and Cooper, W. R., Jr. 1997. Investigations of pheromonal discrimination between conspecific individuals by male and female leopard geckos (Eublepharis macularius). Herpetologica 53:476-485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrick, T. D., Mumme, R. L., and Burghardt, G. M. 1995. Aposematic coloration enhances chemosensory recognition of noxious prey in the garter snake, Thamnophis radix. Anim. Behav. 49:857-866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoen, C., Bauwens, D., and Verheyen, R. F. 1986. Chemoreceptive and behavioural responses of the common lizard Lacerta vivipara to snake chemical deposits. Anim. Behav. 34:1805-1813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitt, L. J., and Congdon, J. D. 1978. Body shape, reproductive effort, and relative clutch mass in lizards. Am. Nat. 112:595-608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitt, L. J., and Price, H. 1982. Ecological and evolutionary determinants of relative clutch mass in lizards. Herpetologica 38:237-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Jiang, X. C., Chen, P., Inouchi, J., and Halpern, M. 1993. Chemical and immunological analysis of prey-derived vomeronasal stimulants. Brain Behav. Evol. 41:246-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, P. 1982. Responses to ophiophagous snakes by snakes of the genus Thamnophis. Copeia 1982:788-794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, P., and Burghardt, G. M. 1979. The ophiophage defensive response in crotaline snakes: Extension to new taxa. J. Chem. Ecol. 5:141-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, W. S. 1938. The role of Jacobson's organ in the feeding reaction of the common garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis (Linn.). J. Exp. Zool. 77:445-465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J. 1962. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, B. A. 1993. Evaluating hypotheses for the transfer of stimulus particles to Jacobson's organ in snakes. Brain Behav. Evol. 41:203-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indiana University-Purdue University at Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46805-1499

    William E. Cooper Jr.

Authors
  1. William E. Cooper Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, W.E. Evaluation of Swab and Related Tests as a Bioassay for Assessing Responses by Squamate Reptiles to Chemical Stimuli. J Chem Ecol 24, 841–866 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022373517653

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022373517653

Search

Navigation