Skip to main content
Log in

Genotypic fidelity of micropropagated pineapple (Ananas comosus) plantlets assessed by isozyme and RAPD markers

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present work, pineapple plantlets (cv. `Amarelinho') micropropagated by stationary (S) and temporary immersion (T) systems were evaluated in terms of genotypic fidelity by isozyme and RAPD markers. Neither isozymes (average 0.67%) nor RAPDs (average 7.5%) alone detected significant differences between the two micropropagated systems. However, when combined isozymes and RAPDs data more somaclonal variants were detected in S than T, with RAPDs revealing more variation than isozymes. In the T system, the treatment with PBZ 6.0 μM gave the greatest occurrence of variants (8.9%), although significant statistical differences (χ; p>0.05) between presence and absence of PBZ or GA were not detected. Temporary immersion in comparison with the stationary system resulted in the lowest proportion of somaclonal variants (1.9% vs. 3.9%). Although it does not represent an in depth genome analysis, ours is the first work that has attempted to evaluate the genotypic fidelity of micropropagated pineapple plantlets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja MR (1987) Somaclonal variation. In: Bonga JM & Durzan DJ (eds) Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry (pp. 272-285). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfenas AC, Peters I, Brune W & Passador GC (1991) Eletroforese de Prote?nas e Isoenzimas de Fungos e Essências Florestais. UFV, Vicosa

  • Alves JMC, Sihachakr D, Allot M, Tizroutine S, Mussio I, Servaes A & Ducreux G (1994) Isozyme modifications and plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.). Plant Cell Rep. 13: 437-441

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Zahim MA, Ford-Lloyd BV & Newbury HJ (1999) Detection of somaclonal variation in garlic (Allium sativum L.) using RAPD and cytological analysis. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 853-857

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral JRS & Matos AP (1995) Pineapple breeding for resistance to Fusariosis in Brazil. Rev. Fac. Agro. 21: 137-145

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousineau JC & Dounelly DJ (1989) Identification of raspberry cultivars in vivo and in vitro using isozymes analysis. HortScience 24: 490-492

    Google Scholar 

  • Daquinta M & Benega R (1997) Review of tissue culture in pineapple. Pineapple News 3: 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Vesco LL, Pinto AA, Zaffari GR, Nodari RO, Reis MS & Guerra MP (2001) Improving pineapple micropropagation protocol through explant size and medium composition manipulation. Fruits 56: 143-154

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Vesco LL, Pescador R, Belo A, Feuser S, Oliveira EN, Brancher A, Zaffari GR, Nodari RO & Guerra MP (2000) Qualidade genotýpica de mudas e performance a campo de plantas micropropagadas de abacaxizeiro. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 22: 80-85

    Google Scholar 

  • Deverno LL, Charest PJ & Bonen L (1994) Mitochondrial DNA variation in somatic embryogenic cultures of Larix. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 727-732

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWald MG, Moore GA & Sherman WB (1988) Identification of pineapple cultivars by isozyme genotypes. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 113: 935-938

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWald MG, Moore GA & Sherman WB (1992) Isozymes in Ananas (Pineapple): Genetics and usefulness in taxonomy. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 117: 491-496

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ & Doyle JL (1987) Isolantion of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13-15

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DA, Sharp WR & Medina Filho HP (1984) Somaclonal and gametoclonal variation. Am. J. Bot. 71: 759-774

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuser S, Nodari RO & Guerra MP (2001) Eficiência comparativa dos sistemas de cultura estacionária e imersão temporária para a micropropagão do abacaxizeiro. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 23: 6-10

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra MP, Dal Vesco LL, Pescador R, Schuelter AR & Nodari RO (1999) Estabelecimento de um protocolo regenerativo para a micropropagação do abacaxizeiro (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.). Pesqui. Agropecuária Bras. 34: 1557-1563

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ & White TJ (1990) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Isabel N, Tremblay L, Michaud M, Tremblay FM & Bousquet J (1993) RAPDs as an aid to evaluate the genetic integrity of somatic embryogenesis-derived populations of Picea mariana (Mill) BSP. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 81-87

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaligot E, Rival A, Beule T, Dussert S & Verdeil JL (2000) Somaclonal variation in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.): the DNA methylation hyphotesis. Plant Cell Rep. 19: 684-690

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawata M, Ohmiya A, Shimamoto Y, Oono K & Takaiwa F (1995) Structural changes in the plastid DNA of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during tissue culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90: 364-371

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller OL (1981) O Cultivo do Abacaxi em Santa Catarina. EMPASC, Florianópolis, Boletim Técnico 9

  • Larkin PJ & Scowcroft WR (1981) Somaclonal variation - a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60: 547-554

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal F & Coppens d'Eeckenbrugge G (1996) Pineapple. In: Janick J & Moore JN (eds) Fruit Breeding, Tree and Tropical FruitsVol. 1 (pp.515-557). John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pehu E, Gassman C, Veilleux R & Kalb T (1986) Changes in isozyme patterns and ultraestructure of calus tissue of Solanum phureja during regeneration. HortScience 21: 251

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschke VM & Phillips RL (1992) Genetic implications of somaclonal variation in plants. Adv. Genet. 30: 41-75

    Google Scholar 

  • Skirvin RM, McPheeters KD & Norton M (1994) Sources and frequencies of somaclonal variation. HortScience 29: 1232-1237

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR & Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PWJ, Geijskes JR, Ko HL, Fraser TA, Henry RJ & Birch RG (1995) Sensitivity of random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis to detect genetic change in sugarcane during tissue culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90: 1169-1173

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil IK & Vasil V (1980) Clonal propagation. In: Vasil IK (ed) Perspectives in Plant Cell and Tissue Culture (pp. 145-173). Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil IK, Ahuja MR & Vasil V (1979) Plant tissue culture in genetics and plant breeding. Adv. Genet. 20: 127-215

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakasa K (1989) Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr ). In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Trees II Vol. 5 (pp. 13-29). Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA & Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 6531-6535

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh J & MacClelland M (1990) Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary rimers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 7213-7218

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rubens O. Nodari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feuser, S., Meler, K., Daquinta, M. et al. Genotypic fidelity of micropropagated pineapple (Ananas comosus) plantlets assessed by isozyme and RAPD markers. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 72, 221–227 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022321405683

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022321405683

Keywords

Navigation