Abstract
As part of the Kentucky Education Reform Act, school-based Family Resource/Youth Service Centers were commissioned to address those poverty-related issues that attenuate children and youths' coming to school prepared to learn. The centers had flexible mandates and were to adapt their service profiles to local urban, suburban and rural communities. A variety of grounded, inductive qualitative strategies were employed in an implementation evaluation that yielded profiles or domains of program elements, and descriptions of implementation strategies and impact on participants. These program descriptors were considered accurate by program personnel, formed the basis for training new program coordinators, and have served as reliable predictors of educational outcomes for program participants, thus affirming the utility of the qualitative evaluation approaches.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alexander, K. L., & Entwisle, D. R. (1996). How do school processes affect children and their families? In A. Booth & J. F. Dunn (Eds.), Family-school links (pp. 67–88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bond, J. T., & Halpern, R. (1988). The cross-project evaluation of the Child Survival/Fair Start Initiative: A case study of action research. In H. B. Weiss, & F. H. Jacobs (Eds.), Evaluating Family programs (pp.347–370). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
Booth, A., & Dunn, J. F. (Eds.). (1996). Family-school links. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Christenson, S. L., Rounds, T., & Gorney, D. (1992). Family factors and student achievement: An avenue to increase students' success. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 178–206.
Comer, J. (1986). Home-school relations as they affect the academic success of children. Education and Urban Society, 16, 323–337.
Cronbach, L. J., and Associates. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dryfoos, J. G. (1994) Full-service schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Deal, A. G. (1988). Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Hamby, D. W. (1996). Measuring the help giving practices of human services program practitioners. Human Relations, 49, 815–826.
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., Starnes, A. L., Hamby, D. W., & Gordon, N.J. (1991) Family support programs for persons with disabilities: Key elements, differential characteristics end program outcomes. Family Systems Intervention Monography, 3,(1).
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz, The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Illback, R. J. (1994). Poverty and the crisis in children's services: The need for services integration. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23, 413–424.
Illback, R. J., & Kalafat, J. (1995). Initial evaluation of a school-based integrated service program: Kentucky's family resource and youth service centers. Special Services in the Schools, 10, 139–163.
Illback, R. J., Zins, J. E., Maher, C. A., & Greenberg, R. (1990). An overview of principles and procedures of program planning and evaluation. In T. B. Gutkin., & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 799–820). New York: Wiley.
Jacobs, F. H. (1988). The Live-tiered approach to evaluation: Context and implementation. In H. B. Weiss, & F. H. Jacobs (Eds.), Evaluating family programs (pp. 37–68). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
Kagan, S. L., & Weissbourd, B. (Eds.). (1994). Putting families first: America's family support movement and the challenge of change. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Knapp, M. S. (1995). How shall we study comprehensive, collaborative services for children and families? Educational Researcher, 24, 5–16.
Larner, M. (1992). Realistic expectations: Review of evaluation findings. In M. Larner, R. Halpern, & O. Harkavy (Eds.), Fair start for children (pp. 136–158). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (1986). Utilization-focused evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Pecora, P. J., Fraser, M. W., Nelson, K. E., McCroskey, J., & Meezan, W. (1995). Evaluating family-based services. New York: Aldine.
Pfannestiel, J., Lambson, T., & Yarnell, V. (1991). Second wave study of the Parents As Teachers program: Final report. St. Louis, MO: Research and Training Associates.
Powell, D. R. (1994). Evaluating family support programs: Are we making progress? In S. L. Kagan, & B. Weissbourd (Eds.), Putting families first (pp. 441–470). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Riessman, F. (1967). A neighborhood-based mental health approach. In E.L. Cowen, E. A. Gardner, & M. Zax, (Eds.), Emergent approaches to mental health problems (pp. 162–184). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Rodwell, M. K. (1995). Constructivist research: A qualitative approach. In P. J. Pecora, M. W. Frasor, K. E. Nelson, J. McCreshy, & W. Meezan (Eds.). Evaluating family-based services (pp. 191–214). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
Sechrest, L., & Sidani, S. (1995). Quantitative and qualitative methods: Is there an alternative? Evaluation and Program Planning, 18, 77–87.
Schorr, L. B., & Schorr, D. (1988). Within our reach: Breaking the cycle of disadvantage. New York: Doubleday.
Weinstein, R. S., Soule, C. R., Collins, F., Cone, J., Mehlhorn, M., & Simontacchi, K. (1991). Expectations and high school change: Teacher-researcher collaboration to prevent school failure. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 333–363.
Weiss, H. B. (1988). Family support and education programs: Working through ecological theories of human development. In H. B. Weiss, & F. H. Jacobs (Eds.), Evaluating family programs (pp. 221–238). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
Weiss, H. B., & Jacobs, F. (1988). Evaluating family programs. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
Weissbourd, B. (1994). The evolution of the family resource movement. In S. L. Kagan & B. Weissbourd (Eds.), Putting families first: America's family support movement and the challenge of change, (pp. 28–48). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wholey, J. (1979). Evaluation: Promise and performance. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Zigler, E. (1994). Forward. In S. L. Kagan & B. Weissbourd (Eds.), Putting families first: America's family support movement and the challenge of change (pp. xi–xix). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalafat, J., Illback, R.J. A Qualitative Evaluation of School-Based Family Resource and Youth Service Centers. Am J Community Psychol 26, 573–604 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022192905992
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022192905992