Abstract
This exploratory case study provides empirical support for three critical assumptions of empowerment theory. Many empowerment theorists have argued that empowerment takes on multiple forms across people, is contextually embedded, and shifts over time (Rappaport, 1984; Zimmerman, 1990, 1995). To better understand the implications of these assumptions for empowerment theory and the research and intervention methods we employ, the empowerment experiences of 49 employees within a large human service delivery organization were explored. A method well suited to investigate empowerment's assumptions of multiplicity and dynamism—a constructivist approach to inquiry—was employed. Content analyses of interview and observational data revealed that the process of empowerment may be more complex than originally conceived. Not only did multiple meanings and desires for empowerment emerge across employees and between employees and leaders, but several shifting ecologies impacted the employees' lives, causing the employees' empowerment experiences to fluctuate. Empowerment emerged as a dynamic, highly individualistic, contextually layered process. Multiple forms, contexts, and dynamics that influenced employee empowerment are described. Implications of these findings for empowerment research and intervention are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Acker, J., Barry, K., & Esseveld, J. (1991). Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. In M. M. Fonow & J. A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 133–153). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Bartunek, J. M., Foster-Fishman, P., & Keys, C.B. (1996) Using collaborative advocacy to foster intergroup cooperation. Human Relations, 49, 701–733.
Bartunek, J. M., & Keys, C. B. (1979). Participation in school decision making. Urban Education, 14(1), 52–75.
Bartunek, J. M., Lacey, C. A., & Wood, D. R. (1992). Social cognition in organizational change: An insider-outsider approach. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28, 204–223.
Bartunek, J. M., & Louis, M. R. (1996). Insider/outsider team research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Belenky, J., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books.
Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? Science, 210, 1262–1264.
Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029–1031.
Block, P. (1987). The empowered manager. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Campbell, R. & Salem, D. A. (in press). Concept mapping as a feminist research method: Examining the community response to rape.
Cannon, L. W., Higgenbotham, E., & Leung, M. L. A. (1991). Race and class bias in qualitative research on women. In M. M. Fonow & J. A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 107–118). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471–482.
Eccles, J. S., & Jacobs, J. E. (1986). Social forces shape math attitudes and permanence. Signs, 11, 367–389.
Entwistle, D. (1972). To dispel fantasies about fantasy based measures of achievement motivation. Psychology Bulletin, 77, 377–391.
Evered, R., & Louis, M. R. (1981). Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: “Inquiry from the inside” and “inquiry from the outside.” Academy of Management, 6, 385–395.
Fawcett, S. B., Paine-Andrews, A., Francisco, V. T., Schulz, J. A., Richter, K. P., Lewis, R. K., Williams, E. L., Harris, K. J., Berkely, J. Y., Fisher, J. L., & Lopez, C. M. (1995). Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnership for community health and development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 677–699.
Fawcett, S. B., White, G. W., Balcazar, F. E., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Mathews, R. M., Paine-Andrews, A., Seekins, T., & Smith, J. F. (1994). A contextual-behavioral model of empowerment: Case studies involving people with physical disabilities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 471–496.
Fetterman, D. M. (1989). Ethnography step by step (Applied Social Research Methods Series, No. 117). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Foster-Fishman, P. G. (1994). The influence of organizational culture on the adoption and implementation of an empowerment philosophy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. (1997). The person/environment dynamics of employee empowerment: An organization culture analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 345–370.
Gergen, K. J. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Gergen, K. (1985). The social constructionist movement in social psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266–275.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goldberger, N. R., Clinchy, B. M., Belenky, M. F., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's way of knowing: On gaining a voice. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender (pp. 201–225). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Gruber, J., & Trickett, E. J. (1987). Can we empower others: the paradox of empowerment in the governing of an alternative public school. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 353–371.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1988). The meaning of difference: Gender, theory, post-modernism and psychology. American Psychologist, 43, 455–464.
Harrison, M. I. (1994). Diagnosing Organizations: Methods, models and processes (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Heidegger, M. (1977). Basic Writings. New York: Harper Row.
Hill Collins, P. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The Sociological significance of black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33, 514–532).
Husserl, E. (1975). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. New York: Collier.
Kelly, J. G. (1988). A guide to conducting prevention research in the community. New York: Haworth.
Kieffer, C. H. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A developmental perspective. In J. Rappaport, C. Swift, & R. Hess (Eds.), Studies in empowerment: Steps toward understanding and action (pp. 9–35). New York: Haworth.
Kingry-Westergaard, C., & Kelly, J. G. (1990). A contextualist epistemology for ecological research. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods (pp. 23–31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kitzinger, C. (1986). Introducing and developing Q as a feminist methodology: A study of an account of lesbianism. In S. Wilkinson (Ed.), Feminist social psychology: Developing theory and practice. Keynes: Open University Press.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Kroeker, C. J. (1995). Individual, organizational, and societal empowerment: A study of the processes in a Nicaraguan agricultural cooperative. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 749–764.
Leiter, K. (1980). A primer on ethnomethodology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In New directions for program evaluation (Vol. 30, pp. 73–84). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lindblom, C. E., & Cohen, D.K. (1979) Usable knowledge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Louis, M. R., & Bartunek, J. M. (1992). Insider/outsider research team: Collaboration across diverse perspectives. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1, 101–110.
Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Maton, K. I., & Salem, D. A. (1995). Organizational Characteristics of Empowering Community Settings: A Multiple Case Study Approach. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 631–656.
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achieve motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
McMillan, B., Florin, P., Stevenson, J., Kerman, B., & Mitchell, R. E. (1995). Empowerment Praxis in Community Coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 699–729.
Meyerson, D., & Martin, J. (1987). Cultural change: An integration of three different views. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 623–647.
Moos, R. H. (1996). Understanding environments: The key to improving social processes and program outcomes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 193–201.
Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30–61). New York: Routledge.
Ozer, E., & Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 472–468.
Pacanowsky, M. (1988). Communicating in the empowering organization. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (vol. 11, pp. 356–379). Newbury Park: Sage.
Potter, J., & Collie, S. (1989). 'Community care' as persuasive rhetoric: A study of discourse. Disability Handicap and Society, 4(1), 57–64.
Prestby, J. E., Wandersman, A., Florin, P., Rich, R., & Chavis, D. M. (1990). Benefits, costs, incentive management, and participation in voluntary organizations: A means to understanding and promoting empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 117–149.
Przeworksi, A., & Teune, A. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley.
Rapport, J. (1984). Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue. Prevention in Human Services, 3, 1–7.
Rapport, J. (1990). Research methods and the empowerment social agenda. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology: Integrating theories and methodologies (pp. 61–63). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Rappaport, J. (1995). Empowerment meets narrative: Listening to stories and creating settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 795–808.
Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rich, R. C., Edelstein, M., Hallman, W. K., & Wandersman, A. H. (1995). Citizen participation and empowerment: The case of local environmental hazards. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 657–676.
Sackman, S. A. (1991a). Cultural knowledge in organizations: Exploring the collective mind. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Sackman, S. A. (1991b). Uncovering culture in organizations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 295–317.
Sackman, S. A. (1992). Culture and subcultures: An analysis of organizational knowledge. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 140–161.
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Serrano-Garcia, I. (1984). The illusion of empowerment: Community development within a colonial context. In J. Rappaport, C. Swift, & R. Hess (Eds.), Studies in empowerment: Steps toward understanding and action (pp. 9–35). New York: Haworth.
Serrano-Garcia, I., & Bond, M. A. (1994). Empowering the silent ranks: Introduction. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 433–446.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). An Empirical Test of a Comprehensive Model of Intrapersonal Empowerment in the Workplace. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 601–629.
Strawn, C. (1994). Beyond the Buzz Work: Empowerment in Community Outreach and Education. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30, 159–175.
Swigonski, M. E. (1994). The logic of feminist standpoint theory for social work research. Social Work, 39, 387–393.
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666–681.
Tolan, P., Chertok, F., Keys, C., & Jason, L. (1990). Conversing about theories, methods, and community research. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods (pp. 3–8). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Nothing Is Quite So Practical as a Good Theory. Academy of Management Review, 14, 486–489.
Van Maanen, J., & Barley, S. (1985). Cultural organization: Fragments of a theory. In P., Frost, L., Moore, M., Louis, C., Lundberg, & J. Martin (Eds.), Organizational culture (pp. 31–54). Beverly Hills, Ca: Sage.
Wagner, J. A., III (1994). Participation's effect on performance and satisfaction: A reconsideration of research evidence. Academy of Management Review, 19. 312–330.
Whetten, D. A. (1989). What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14, 490–495.
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
Zimmerman, M. A. (1990). Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between psychological and individual conceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 169–177.
Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychology empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 581–600.
Zimmerman, M. A., Israel, B. A., Schulz, A., & Checkoway, B. (1992). Further explorations in empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 707–728.
Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 725–750.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foster-Fishman, P.G., Salem, D.A., Chibnall, S. et al. Empirical Support for the Critical Assumptions of Empowerment Theory. Am J Community Psychol 26, 507–536 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022188805083
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022188805083