Abstract
We assessed relationships between environmental characteristicsand macroinvertebrate assemblages in lotic habitats of California's Central Valley with community metric and multivariate statistical approaches. Using canonical ordinationanalyses, we contrasted results when assemblage structure was assessed with macroinvertebrate metrics, as suggested for use inindices of biotic integrity, or with genera abundances. Our objectives were to identify metrics or taxa diagnostic of loticenvironmental stressors and compare the capacity of theseapproaches to detect stressors in order to suggest how they mightbe used to diagnose stressors. For macroinvertebrate metrics,redundancy analysis (RDA) extracted three axes correlated withchannel morphology and substrates. For genera abundances, canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) extracted two axescorrelated with soluble salts and with channel morphology andsubstrates but did not separate these gradients onto differentaxes. Cluster analyses identified five RDA and five CCA sitegroups, which exhibited differences for environmental variables,metrics, or genera abundances, and agreement between the analysesin partitioning of sites was greater than if sites were partitioned randomly. These approaches differ in their abilityto detect environmental stressors, because they measure differentaspects of assemblages and would be complementary in design ofnew metrics diagnostic of stressors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
APHA: 1995, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, 1085 pp.
Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D. and Stribling, J. B.: 1999, Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish, 2nd ed., EPA 841/D-97-002, USEPA, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
Carlisle, D. M. and Clements, W. H.: 1999, 'Sensitivity and variability of metrics used in biological assessments of running waters', Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18, 285-291.
Chessman, B. C. and McEvoy, P. K.: 1998, 'Towards diagnostic biotic indices for river macroinvertebrates', Hydrobiologia 364, 169-182.
Clarke, R. T., Furse, M. T., Wright, J. F. and Moss, D.: 1996, 'Derivation of a biological quality index for river sites: Comparison of the observed with the expected fauna', J. Appl. Stat. 23, 311-332.
Cummins, K. W.: 1974, 'Structure and function of stream ecosystems', Bioscience 24, 631-641.
Domagalski, J. L., Knifong, D. L., MacCoy, D. E., Dileanis, P. D., Dawson, B. J. and Majewski, M. S.: 1998, Water Quality Assessment of the Sacramento River Basin, California-Environmental Setting and Study Design, USGS Water-Resource Invest. 97-4254, USGS, Sacramento, CA.
Dufrene, M. and Legendre, P.: 1997, 'Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach', Ecol. Monogr. 67, 345-366.
Fore, L. S., Karr, J. R. and Wisseman, R. W.: 1996, 'Assessing invertebrate responses to human activities: Evaluating alternative approaches', J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 15, 212-231.
Griffith, M. B., Kaufmann, P. R., Herlihy, A. T. and Hill, B. H.: 2001, 'Analysis of macroinvertebrate assemblages in relation to environmental gradients in Rocky Mountain streams', Ecol. Appl. 11, 489-505.
Gronberg, J. M., Dubrovsky, N. M., Kratzer, C. R., Domagalski, J. L., Brown, L. R. and Burow, K. R.: 1998, Environmental Setting of the San Joaquin-Tulare Basins, California, USGS Water-Resource Invest. 97-4205, USGS, Sacramento, CA.
Heisel, D. R.: 1990, 'Less than obvious: Statistical treatment of data below the detection limit', Environ. Sci. Technol. 24, 1787-1774.
Herlihy, A. T., Larsen, D. P., Paulsen, S. G., Urquhart, N. S. and Rosenbaum, B. J.: 2000, 'Designing a spatially balanced, randomized site selection process for regional stream surveys: The EMAP mid-Atlantic pilot study', Environ. Monit. Assess. 63, 95-113.
Hilsenhoff, W. L.: 1987, 'An improved biotic index of organic stream pollution', Great Lakes Entomol. 20, 31-39.
Hollander, M. and Wolf, D. A.: 1973, Nonparametric Statistical Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 503 pp.
Hope, A. C. A.: 1968, 'A simplified Monte Carlo significance test procedure', J. R. Stat. Soc. B 30, 582-598.
Hubert, L. and Arabie, P.: 1985, 'Comparing partitions', J. Classific. 2, 193-218.
Karr, J. R. and Chu, E. W.: 1999, Restoring Life in Running Waters, Island Press, Washington, DC, 206 pp.
Kaufmann, P. R., Levine, P., Robison, E. G., Seeliger, C. and Peck, D.: 1999, Quantifying Physical Habitat in Wadeable Streams, EPA 620/R-99-003, USEPA, Corvallis, OR.
Kerans, B. L. and Karr, J. R.: 1994, 'A benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee Valley', Ecol. Appl. 4, 768-785.
Lazorchak, J. M., Klemm, D. J. and Peck, D. J. (eds): 1998, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program-Surface Waters: Field Operations and Methods Manual for Measuring the Ecological Condition of Wadeable Streams, EPA 620/R94-004F, USEPA, Washington, DC.
Legendre, P. and Legendre, L.: 1998, Numerical Ecology, 2nd English ed., Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 853 pp.
Leland, H. V. and Fend, S. V.: 1998, 'Benthic invertebrate distributions in the San Joaquin River, California, in relation to physical and chemical factors', Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55, 1051-1067.
Lewis, P. A. and Klemm, D. J.: 1994, 'Laboratory Methods for Processing of Benthic Invertebrate Samples', in D. J. Klemm and J. M. Lazorchak (eds), Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program-Surface Waters and Region 3 Regional Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program: 1994 pilot laboratory methods manual for streams, EPA 620/R94-003, USEPA, Washington, DC. pp. 5.1-5.16.
Lowrance, L., Leonard, R. and Sheridan, J.: 1985, 'Managing riparian ecosystems to control nonpoint source pollution', J. Soil Water Conserv. 40, 87-91.
Maddock, I.: 1999, 'The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river health', Freshw. Biol. 41, 373-391.
Merritt, R. W. and Cummins, K. W.: 1984, An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 2nd ed., Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IO.
Moss, D., Wright, J. F., Furse, M. T. and Clarke, R. T.: 1999, 'A comparison of alternative techniques for prediction of the fauna of running-water sites in Great Britain', Freshw. Biol. 41, 167-181.
Mount, J. F.: 1995, California Rivers and Streams. The Conflict Between Fluvial Process and Land Use, University of California Press, Berkley, CA, 359 pp.
Omernik, J. M.: 1987, 'Ecoregions of the conterminous United States', Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 77, 118-125.
Presser, T. S., Sylvester, M. A. and Low, W. H.: 1994, 'Bioaccumulation of selenium from natural geologic sources in western states and its potential consequences', Environ. Manage. 18, 423-436.
Rice, W. R.: 1989, 'Analyzing tables of statistical tests', Evolution 43, 223-225.
Rodriguez, M. A. and Magnan, P.: 1993, 'Community structure of lacustrine macrobenthos: Do taxon-based and size-based approaches yield similar insights?', Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50, 800-815.
SAS: 1996, SAS/STAT Users Guide, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 1028 pp.
Schlosser, I. J. and Karr, J. R.: 1981, 'Water quality in agricultural watersheds: Impact of riparian vegetation during base flow', Water Resour. Bull. 17, 233-240.
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J.: 1995, Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd ed., W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA, 887 pp.
Strahler, A. N.: 1957, 'Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology', Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 38, 913-920.
Ter Braak, C. J. F.: 1986, 'Canonical correspondence analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis', Ecology 67, 1167-1179.
Ter Braak, C. J. F.: 1987, CANOCO-A FORTRAN Program for Canonical Community Ordination by [partial], [detrended], [canonical] Correspondence Analysis, Principal Components Analysis, and Redundance analysis, Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 95 pp.
Ter Braak, C. J. F.: 1995, 'Ordination', in R. H. G. Jongman, C. J. F. Ter Braak and O. F. R. Tongeren (eds), Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, new ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 91-173.
Ter Braak, C. J. F. and Verdonschot, P. F. M.: 1995, 'Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology', Aquat. Sci. 57, 255-289.
USEPA: 1983, Methods of Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA 600/4-79-020, USEPA, Cincinnati, OH.
USEPA: 1987a, Handbook of Methods for Acid Deposition Studies: Laboratory Analysis for Surface Water Chemistry,EPA 600/4-87/026, USEPA, Washington, DC.
USEPA: 1987b, Ambient Aquatic Life Water Quality Criteria for Selenium, EPA 440/5-87-006, USEPA, Washington, DC.
USEPA: 1994, Methods for the Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples-Supplement 1, EPA 600/R-94-111, USEPA, Cincinnati, OH.
Wright, J. F.: 1995, 'Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna of flowing waters', Aust. J. Ecol. 20, 181-197.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Griffith, M.B., Husby, P., Hall, R.K. et al. Analysis of Macroinvertebrate Assemblages in Relation to Environmental Gradients among Lotic Habitats of California's Central Valley. Environ Monit Assess 82, 281–309 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021994318025
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021994318025