Skip to main content
Log in

An Evaluation of Variables that Influence the Selection of Participants for Innovative Services

  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the differences between adults selected for an agency's new initiative in using person centered planning with adults who remained on the waiting list for this service. A total of 45 adults participated in this research, 22 of whom received person centered planning and 23 of whom remained on a waiting list. Participant interviews were conducted using the Residential Lifestyle Inventory and the Social Network Analysis Form. Individuals selected first for person centered planning had significantly higher scores on several categories of these inventories. The agency case managers were then surveyed to determine variables that influenced selection for services. Case managers reported that participants' self advocacy for a new job had the strongest influence on their selection of the first participants for person centered planning. A few cases were strongly influenced by other advocates, a crisis situation, or administrators. Implications of determining selection criteria when the need for services exceeds available resources are discussed based on the outcomes of this research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Affleck, J. Q., Edgar, E., Levine, Pl, and Kortering, L. (1990). Post-school status of students classified as mildly mentally retarded, learning disabled, or nonhandicapped: Does it get better with time? Ed. Train. Ment. Retard. 25: 315–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewley, C., and Glendinning, C. (1994). Representing the views of disabled people in community care planning. Dis. Soc. 9: 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddock, D. (1994). Presidential address 1994: New frontiers in mental retardation. Ment. Retard. 32: 434–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, R., and Rotegard, L. (1993). Day training and habilitation reimbursement: A target approach. J. Dis. Pol. Studies 4: 65–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faw, G., Davis, P., and Peck, C. (1996). Increasing self-determination: Teaching people with mental retardation to evaluate residential options. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 29: 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxx, R. M., Faw, G., Taylor, S., and Davis, P. (1993). Would I be able to...? Teaching clients to assess the availability of their community living life style preferences. Am. J. Ment. Retard. 98: 235–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinlein, K. B., and Fortune, J. (1995). Who stays, Who goes? Downsizing the institution in America's most rural state. Res. Devel. Disabil. 16: 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. H., Horner, R. H., Newton, J. S., and Kanda, E. (1990). Measuring the activity patterns of adults with severe disabilities using the Residential Lifestyles Inventory. J. Assoc. Pers. Sev. Hand. 15: 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morningstar, M. E., Turnbull, A. P., and Turnbull, H. R. (1996). What do students with disabilities tell us about the importance of family involvement in the transition from school to adult life? Except. Child. 62: 249–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount, B. (1994). Benefits and limitations of personal futures panning. In Bradley, V. J., Ashbaugh, J. W., and Blaney, B. C. (eds.), Creating Individual Supports for People with Developmental Disabilities, Baltimore, MD, Paul H. Brookes, pp. 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, J. (1987). A guide to lifestyle planning. In Bellamy, T., and Wilcox, B. (eds.), The Activities Catalog: A Community Programming Guide for Youth and Adults with Severe Disabilities. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, pp 75–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, J., Bellamy, G. T., Horner, R., Boles, S., LeBaron, N., and Bennett, A. (1987). Using the Activities Catalogue in residential programs for individuals with severe disabilities. In Wilcox, B., and Bellamy, G. T. (eds.), A Comprehensive Guide to the Activities Catalogue: An Alternative Curriculum for Youth and Adults with Severe Disabilities, Baltimore, Paul H. Brookes, pp. 125–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salkever, D. (1994). Access to vocational rehabilitation services for persons with severe disabilities: Analysis of the 1990 Developmental Disabilities National Consumer Survey. J. Dis. Pol. Studies 5: 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L. (1994). Employment status and perceptions of control of adults with cognitive and developmental disabilities. Res. Devel. Disabil. 15: 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., and Metzler, C. A. (1995). How self-determined are people with mental retardation? The national consumer survey. Ment. Retard. 33: 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. D., and Parent, W. S. (1992). Consumer choice and empowerment in supported employment services: Issues and strategies. J. Assoc. Pers. Sev. Hand. 17: 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, P. S., Ofiesh, N. S., and Boone, R. B. (1996). Self-advocacy preparation of consumers with disabilities: A national perspective of ADA training efforts. J. Assoc. Pers. Sev. Hand. 21: 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Browder, D.M., Cooper, K.J., DaCosta, J. et al. An Evaluation of Variables that Influence the Selection of Participants for Innovative Services. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 11, 47–59 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021860618267

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021860618267

Navigation