Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Temperature and Relative Humidity on Polylactic Acid Plastic Degradation

  • Published:
Journal of environmental polymer degradation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three high molecular weight (120,000 to 200,000 g mol−1) polylactic acid (PLA) plastic films from Chronopol (Ch-I) and Cargill Dow Polymers (GII and Ca-I) were analyzed for their degradation under various temperature and relative humidity (RH) conditions. Two sets of plastic films, each containing 11 samples, were randomly hung in a temperature/humidity-controlled chamber by means of plastic-coated paper clips. The tested conditions were 28, 40, and 55°C at 50 and 100% RH, respectively, and 55°C at 10% RH. The three tested PLA films started to lose their tensile properties when their weight-average molecular weight (M w) was in the range of 50,000 to 75,000 g mol−1. The average degradation rate of Ch-I, GII, and Ca-I was 28,931, 27,361, and 63,025 M w/week, respectively. Hence, GII had a faster degradation rate than Ch-I and Ca-I under all tested conditions. The degradation rate of PLA plastics was enhanced by the increase in temperature and relative humidity. This trend was observed in all three PLA plastics (Ca-I, GII, and Ch-I). Of the three tested films, Ch-I was the first to lose its mechanical properties, whereas Ca-I demonstrated the slowest loss, with mechanical properties under all tested conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. R. Datta and S. P. Tsai (1997) in Fuels and Chemicals from Biomass, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC, pp. 224–236.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anonymous (1997) News from Cargill. Cargill Inc., MN, pp. 1–3.

  3. G. B. Kharas, F. Sanchez-Riera, and D. K. Severson (1994) in D. P. Mobley (Ed.), Plastics from Microbes: Microbial Synthesis of Polymers and Polymer Precursors, Hanser Gardner, OH, pp. 93–137.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Schmidt and N. Padukone (1997) J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 18, 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. N. Chang, R. E. Mueller, and E. L. Iannotti (1996) Plant Growth Regul. 19, 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Datta, S. P. Tsai, P. Bonsignore, S. H. Moon, and J. R. Frank (1995) FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 16, 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. L. Siparsky, K. L. Voorhees, and F. Miao (1998) J. Environ. Polym. Degrad. 6, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ASTM D638–95 (1996) in 1996 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, Villanova, PA, pp. 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ASTM D5296–92 (1996) in 1996 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, Villanova, PA, pp. 425–437.

    Google Scholar 

  10. SAS Institute Inc. (1997) SAS Computer Program, Version 6.03, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. L. Robertson (1993) in H. A. Hughes (Ed.), Food Packaging: Principles and Practice, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 9–62.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. M. Mayer and D. L. Kaplan (1994) Trends Polym. Sci. 2, 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Jamshidi, S. H. Hyon, and Y. Ikada (1988) Polymer, 29, 2229.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. S. Lipinsky and R. G. Sinclair (1986) Chem. Eng. Prog. 8, 26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ho, KL.G., Pometto, A.L. & Hinz, P.N. Effects of Temperature and Relative Humidity on Polylactic Acid Plastic Degradation. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 7, 83–92 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021808317416

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021808317416

Navigation