Skip to main content
Log in

Adhesion of Staphylococcus Aureus to Implants with Different Physicochemical Characteristics

  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Adhesion of pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus (strain 209) to BT1-0 titanium disks (12 mm in diameter) with different coatings and noncoated was studied in vitro by photocolorimetry. Transparency of bacterial suspension in normal saline was evaluated after 2-h culturing with the implants at 37°C. The decrease of S. aureus content in the suspension due to its adsorption on implants was negligible and increased by 0.9-5.5% in comparison with the control (adhesion to glass). When the specimens were placed into bacterial suspension, the density of staphylococcal adsorption on the surface considerably increased (by 9-53%) in comparison with the control, which attested to active participation of the implants in bacterial adsorption. The degree of bacterial adhesion to the implants decreased in the following order: disk with calcium phosphate ceramic coating-disk with calcium phosphate X-ray amorphous coating-disk without coating-disk with cermet coating. The adhesion of Staphylococcus is a stochastic process depending on the sum of implant characteristics, in particular, on the phase composition of the coating, electric conductivity, and Ca/P ionic ratio. The authors conclude that the formation of antibacterial properties of coating by saturating them with antibiotics or impregnation with metals, specifically silver ion implantation, is justified, because it reduces the postimplantation infection risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. I. Kalita, Fizika i Khimiya Obrabotki Materialov, No. 5, 28–45 (2000).

  2. A. V. Karlov, V. I. Vereshchagin, V. P. Shakhov, et al., Genii Ortoped., No. 4, 28–33 (1999).

  3. V. I. Pokrovskii and O. K. Pozdneev, Medical Microbiology [in Russian], Moscow (1999).

  4. R. Bos, H. S. van der Mei, and H. J. Busscher, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 23,No. 2, 179–230 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. H. Dougherty, Handbook of Biomaterials Evaluation, Ed. A. F. von Recum, New York (1986), pp. 276–289.

  6. M. C. Hudson, W. K. Ramp, and K. P. Frankenburg, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 173, 279–284 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. A. Imam and A. C. Fraker, Medical Applications of Titanium and Its Alloys: The Material and Biological Issues, Eds. S. A. Brown and J. E. Lemons, West Conshohocken (1996), pp. 3–16.

  8. F.-H. Jumi, A. Yasumasa, M. Shogo, et al., J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 21, 913–920.

  9. P. Kovacs and G. A. Davidson, Medical Applications of Titanium and Its Alloys: The Material and Biological Issues, Eds. S. A. Brown and J. E. Lemons, West Conshohocken (1996), pp. 163–178.

  10. J. V. Nepola, External Fixation, Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults, Lippincot (1996), Vol. 1, pp. 229–304.

  11. H. C. Vogely, C. J. Oosterbos, E. W. Puts, et al., J. Orthop. Res., 18, 485–493 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karlov, A.V., Khlusov, I.A., Pontak, V.A. et al. Adhesion of Staphylococcus Aureus to Implants with Different Physicochemical Characteristics. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine 134, 277–280 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021567804286

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021567804286

Navigation