Abstract
By 1958, a model of human behavior capable of serving as the micro-level foundation for organizational and policy studies was in place, due primarily to the efforts of Herbert Simon, organization theorist James March, and computer scientist Allen Newell. Yet the fundamentals of that model, the behavioral model of choice, to this date have not been fully incorporated into policy studies and organizational analyses. The ‘Simon program’ remains incomplete. Much analysis continues to rely on thick or thin models of rational maximization. As is well-known, the behavioral model of choice links to organizational processes better than rational actor assumptions. But the behavioral model of choice also predicts distributions of organizational and policy outputs in a superior fashion, and need not draw in extraneous descriptive facets of human behavior to the analysis. As Herb Simon did beginning in 1945 until his death in 2001, I continue to advocate a solid behavioral base for the analysis of political and economic systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumgartner, F. R. and B. D. Jones (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brown, S.R. (2001). ‘structural and functional information: A cautionary note to Fernandes and Simon.’ New Haven Connecticut: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Policy Sciences.
Carpenter, D. (1996). ‘Adaptive signal processing, hierarchy, and budgetary control in federal regulation,’ American Political Science Review90: 283–302.
Cohen, M., J. G. March and J. Olsen (1972). ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice,’ Administrative Science Quarterly17: 1–25.
Fenno, R. (1966). The Power of the Purse. Boston: Little, Brown.
Fernandes, R. and H. A. Simon (1999). ‘A study of how individuals solve complex and Ill-structured problems,’ Policy Sciences32: 225–245.
Fiske, S. and S. Taylor (1991). Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Friedman, J. (1996). ‘Economic approaches to politics,’ in J. Friedman, ed., The Rational Choice Controversy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Frolich, N. and J. Oppenheimer (2000). ‘How people reason about ethics,’ in A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins and S. L. Popkin, eds., Elements of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Green, M. T. and F. Thompson (2001). In J. Bartle, ed., Research in Public Administration: Evolving Theories of Budgeting. San Francisco: JAI Press.
Hammond, T. and G. J. Miller (1987). ‘The core of the constitution,’ American Political Science Review81: 1155–1174.
John, P., H. Margetts and D. Gilbert (2001). ‘Rollercoaster budgeting in the U.K.: Fluctuations and equilibria in U.K. Central Government Programme Expenditures since 1945.’ Kent, U.K.: Paper Presented to the European Consortium for Political Research.
Jones, B. D. (2001). Politics and the Architecture of Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Jones, B. D. (1994). Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, B. D., F. R. Baumgartner and J. L. True (1996). ‘The shape of change: Punctuations and stability in U.S. budgeting, 1947–94.’ Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The Midwest Political Science Association Chicago, Illinois.
Jones, B. D, F. R. Baumgartner and J. L. True (1998). ‘Policy punctuations: U.S. budget authority, 1947–95,’ Journal of Politics60: 1–30.
Jones, B. D. and L. W. Bachelor (1993). The Sustaining Hand, Second Edition Revised. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Jones, B.D., T. Sulkin and H. Larsen (2002). ‘Policy Punctuations in American Political Institutions,’ American Political Science Review. In press.
Jordan, M. (2001). Punctuations and Priorities: Local Government Expenditures.Little Rock: Institute of Government, University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1979). ‘Prospect theory: An analysis of decision-making under risk,’ Econometrica47: 263–291.
Kuklinski, J. and P. Quirk (2000). ‘Reconsidering the rational public; Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion,’ in A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins and S. L. Popkin, eds., Elements of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lupia, A., M. D. McCubbins and S. L. Popkin (2000). ‘Beyond rationality: Reason and the study of politics,’ in A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins and S. L. Popkin, eds., Elements of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mandelbrot, B. (1997). Fractals and Scaling in Finance. New York: Springer.
March, J. (1994). A Primer on Decision-Making. New York: The Free Press.
March, J. and H. A. Simon (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
Newell, A. (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Newell, A. and H. A. Simon (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Padgett, J. F. (1980). ‘Bounded rationality in budgetary research,’ American Political Science Review74: 354–372.
Padgett, J. (1981). ‘Hierarchy and ecological control in federal budgetary decision making,’ American Journal of Sociology87: 75–128.
Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of Man. New York: Wiley.
Simon, H. A. (1977). ‘The logic of heuristic decision-making,’ in R. S. Cohen and M. W. Wartofsky, eds., Models of Discovery. Boston: D. Reidel.
Simon, H A. (1979). ‘Rational decision-making in business organizations,’ American Economic Review69: 495–501.
Simon, H. A. (1983). Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Simon, H. A. (1985). ‘Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science,’ American Political Science Review79: 293–304.
Simon, H. A. (1989). Models of Thought, Volume II. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Simon, H. A. (1990). ‘A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism,’ Science250: 1665–1668.
Simon, H. A. (1993). ‘Altruism and economics,’ American Economic Review83: 151–161.
Simon, H. A. (1995). ‘Rationality in political behavior,’ Political Psychology16: 45–61.
Simon, H. A. (1996a). Models of My Life, MIT Edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Simon, H. A. (1996b). The Sciences of the Artificial, Third Edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Sornette, D. (2000). Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences. Berlin: Springer.
Tetlock, P. (2000). ‘Coping with trade-offs: Psychological constraints and political implications,’ in A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins and S. L. Popkin, eds., Elements of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
True, J. L. (2000). ‘Avalanches and incrementalism: Making policy and budgets in the United States,’ American Review of Public Administration30: 3–18.
Wildavsky, A. (1964). The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston: Little, Brown.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, B.D. Bounded rationality and public policy: Herbert A. Simon and the decisional foundation of collective choice. Policy Sciences 35, 269–284 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021341309418
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021341309418