Skip to main content
Log in

Heterochronous Involvement of Neurotrophic Factors in the Neurochemical Organization of Learning and Memory Processes in Adult Organisms

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies were performed on the involvement of neurotrophic factors in the neurochemical mechanisms of the integrative functions of the brain. The effects of various intrahippocampal doses of antibodies to neurotrophic factors – protein S100 and lectin CSL – were studied on the formation, retention, and reproduction of a habituated acoustic startle response and conditioned fear in adult rats. S100b contents in the hippocampus, hypothalamus, frontal cortex, and cerebellar hemispheres and vermis, and in the basal nuclei were measured in rat brains 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 h after long-term habituation to the startle response. Antibodies to neurotrophic factors had selective and dose-dependent effects on the different memory and learning processes underlying these types of behavior. Changes in S100b in brain structures were seen, which were specific in terms of quantitative levels and dynamics, after acquisition of the behavioral habit. The results obtained here, along with previously reported data on the effects of antibodies to S100b and CSL given into the cerebellum, are discussed as experimental support for the hypothesis of the heterochronous neurochemical organization of integrative brain activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. N. G. Aleksidze, G. A. Berezhnoi, V. O. Nikuradze, and Ya. V. Belik, “The question of the specificity of protein S100 in learning and memory processes,” Neirokhimiya, 1, No. 1, 43–50 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. V. Anokhin, “Molecular scenarios for the consolidation of long-term memory,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 47, No. 2, 262–268 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. K. Anokhin, Biology and Neurophysiology of the Conditioned Reflex [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. P. Ashmarin and S. A. Titov, “Current concepts of the mechanisms of neurobiological memory,” Biol. Nauki, 3, 30–42 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. N. Karishchenko, O. N. Kulikova, and B. R. Stradomskii, “The effects of aggressive reactions on the electrophoretic spectrum of acid proteins of different structures in the rat brain,” Neirokhimiya, 4, No. 1, 30–42 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Rouz, Memory Disturbances. From Molecules to Consciousness [in Russian], Mir, Moscow (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. V. Sudakov, Functional Systems Theory [in Russian], Moscow (1996), p. 96.

  8. G. G. Khludova, “Studies of the relationship between the ultrastructure of synaptic plasticity and the number of ribosomes in dendritic endings in a cellular model of conditioning in the rat neocortex,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 47, No. 6, 1011–1017 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. B. Shvyrkov, An Introduction to Objective Psychology. The Neuronal Basis of the Mind, [in Russian], Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. V. Sherstnev, M. A. Gruden', M. V. Pletnikov, Z. I. Storozheva, and E. A. Shumova, “The involvement of cellular adhesion molecules - lectins CSL and R1 - in learning and memory processes in mature animals,” Neirokhimiya, 14, No. 2, 200–210 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. V. Sherstnev, Z. I. Storozheva, M. A. Gruden', and A. T. Proshin, “Involvement of neurotrophic factors in the central mechanisms of defensive behavior in adult animals,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 75, No. 1, 21–28 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. G. Ambrongi-Lorenzini, E. Baldi, C. Bucharelli, B. Sacchetti, and G. Tassoni, “Temporal characterization of subcortical nuclei in mnemonic processes: results of tetrodotoxin-reversible inactivation studies in the rat,” Arch. Ital. Biol., 136, No. 4, 279–296 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. H. Baily and E. R. Kandel, “Structural changes accompanying memory storage,” Ann. Rev. Physiol, 55, 398–426 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Davis, “The mammalian startle response,” in: Neural Mechanisms of the Startle Behavior, R. C. Eaton (ed.), Plenum Press, New York (1984), pp. 287–361.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Faho, S. Biocea, and S. Fulle, “The S100: a protein family in search of function,” Prog. Neurobiol., 46, No. 1, 71–82 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. F. Gilbert, Developmental Biology, Sanauer Associates Inc. Publishers (1994), p. 895.

  17. H. Hyden, “Plastic change of neurones during acquisition of new behaviour as a problem of protein differentiation,” Prog. Brain Res., 45, No. 1, 83–100 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Isobe and T. Okayama, “Amino-acid sequence of S-100b protein and its relation to the calcium-binding proteins,” Eur. J. Biochem., 89, No. 2, 378–388 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. N. Leuton and W. F. Supple, “Medial cerebellum and long-term habituation of acoustic startle in rats,” Behav. Neurosci., 105, No. 6, 804–816 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. R. Marshak, “S100 beta as a neurotrophic factor,” Prog. Brain Res., 86, 169–181 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. S. O'Daud, W. Q. Zhao, K. T. Ng, and S. P. Robinson, “Chick injected with antisera to either S100 alpha or S100 beta protein develop amnesia for a passive avoidance task,” Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 676, No. 3, 197–206 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. V. Pletnikov, Z. I. Storogeva, and V. V. Sherstnev, “Relationship between memory and fear: Developmental and pharmacological studies,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 54, No. 1, 93–97 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. M. Regan and G. B. Fox, “Polysialysation as a regulator of neural plasticity in rodent learning and aging,” Neurochem. Res., 2, No. 5, 593–598 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. V. Sherstnev, M. A. Gruden, Z. I. Storogeva, A. T. Proshin, and V. B. Kuzhilina, “Molecular mechanisms of neurotrophic factor - Heterochronous Involvement of Neurotrophic Factors 37 S100b participation in learning and memory processes,” Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 26, No. 2, 2240 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Tiunova, K. Anokhin, M. Schachner, and S. P. R. Rose, “Three time windows for amnestic effect of antibodies to cell adhesion molecule L1 in chicks,” Neuroreport, 9, 1645–1648 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Varon, “Neurotrophic factor in cellular functional and cognitive repairs of adult brain,” Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, No. 2, 120–124 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. L. Young, D. L. Bohenek, and M. S. Fanselow, “NMDA processes anterograde amnesia of contextual fear conditioning induced by hippocampal damage: immunization against amnesia by context preexposure,” Behav. Neurosci., 108, No. 1, 19–29 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. P. Zanetta, “Lectins and carbohydrates in animal cell adhesion and control of proliferation,” in: Glycosciences: Status and Perspectives, H. L. Labius and S. Labius (eds.), Chapman and Hall, London (1997), pp. 439–458.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sherstnev, V.V., Gruden', M.A., Storozheva, Z.I. et al. Heterochronous Involvement of Neurotrophic Factors in the Neurochemical Organization of Learning and Memory Processes in Adult Organisms. Neurosci Behav Physiol 33, 31–38 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021123213836

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021123213836

Navigation